Katia's Persuasive Speech On Why You Should Vote

As a consequence we the people believe we all have equal rights, when living in a world of equality when no one is living discriminated by their race, religion and sex and all we do have are freedom, freedom to express our self we as women and people in actuality, at this point where in the world is that place of equality? In my opinion, the world would always be and remained unequal. Furthermore, in the past Women did not only have the right to vote, to run for president, to work, to go to school, they didn't have the right to get an education. women just don't only deal with as property, but also objects. As a consequence after some brave women decided to fight this form of government and social standards in settled all the power that remained

The focus of her presentation is to inform us on how in society we focus on things that aren't important and how we downplay events that are significant throughout the world. Her delivery is professional when she gives her speech, she speaks at slow rate, and her tone is given in a manner that is informal. Exemplifying that she means business, her posture comes

She goes through each argument against buying local with thorough arguments and even concedes sometimes to her opponent in a way that does not take away from her argument. When discussing the fact that buying local sometimes hurts workers in third-world countries she acknowledges that but does not let it bring her argument to a screeching halt. Instead she admits that it could have negative effect but the positive effects should not be ignored. It seemed like she managed to avoid any errors while talking about her topic. Her tone could be at times a bit biased which became noticeable when she would talk about her past and how that connected with the idea of buying local. Besides that she made it reader friendly by explaining things simply with words that were accessible. The point where the effects of global warmings were discussed was written in an easily accessible manner. What I liked best was that she tore apart people’s arguments thread by thread which made it easier to support her side of the issue. While she did discuss certain parts about buying local that bothered people she could have been talked about more critiques toward buying local. All in all she made many valid points about buying local in a good

From a communication and speech analysis stand point Ms. Alexander kept her self poised, keep her tone of voice smooth and inflecting when she needed to drive certain points home. She kept the audience engaged by moving around telling personal anecdotes that related to her topic to allow the persuasiveness of her speech to drive home about the problem of the criminal justice system and race as a whole. Her first point that really captivates and hooks you in within a matter of minutes of listening to the speech is when she says, “ People of color are the main ones incarcerated…Put in cages and treated worse than animals.” Right their she captivates and audience that otherwise believe she's crazy talking about race in the criminal justice system. Ms. Alexander managed to captivate and all WHITE audience on a topic that most had already made up there minds on. Her speech was effective in that all statistics about her topic she

She spoke very clearly and her tone was very easy for me to understand and listen. She put many of the facts she spoke about into situations that her audience could better understand, which made it easier to follow along and comprehend. This also made it seem like more of a conversation instead of just a speech. Because she was familiar with her speech, she hardly relied on her notes during delivery and made good eye contact throughout.

The main points were clear, with the transitions feeling a bit lacking. She spent an equal amount of time on the body paragraphs but they were way too short, as the full speech fell a minute behind the minimum required presentation time. The was no slang, but there were some grammar and syntax issues, which are not completely the fault of the speaker, but are the fault of subject-verb agreement in native language. I would be lucky to do so well in a second language. She used effective imagery with her rhetorical questions, but could have done better imagery application with the soft information.

Cahona gave a very informative presentation she introduces herself by talking about herself when she was a young child and explaining why she is doing what she is doing, she then goes onto gave informative information on the homeless people in the USA and finally ending by giving statistics. She uses a various ways of captivating the audience by making her voice higher, harder and a bit faster for example when she says

Audience member Kat Callo, a Fletcher MA student, said all of the speeches moved her to

In conclusion, I think that Karen Thompson Walker did a great job with her speech. She did well with the content, delivery, and conclusion of her speech. She did have some areas that I would recommend slight improvement. Karen opened her speech with a short story that grabbed her audience's attention from the beginning to the end.

Throughout the entire article, her voice was very strong and evident on how she felt about this topic. She explains her points well by using strong language. Malkin also uses a lot of dry, sarcastic humor, to really drive her points across. For example, when mentioning the maximum age children can be before getting kicked off

In today’s world, women have more freedom than ever before. Though there is always room for improvement, it is obvious that these suffragettes really did make a difference. As a whole, I think that her speech was exceptional. She connected the audience, pulled at their emotions, and gave logical and credible

To begin with, she started her first point by mentioning the first question and then answering honestly. When she answered the question, she made a connection with the audience by

I listen to Patricia Fripp’s speech as well I though she did an awesome job. I could visualize my self in the store with her that day shopping. She really capture my attention the whole speech. I all so tough she did a great job with her posture and hand gesture. I also like the fact that Patricia incorporated humor in her speech, I think that a good way to end tension and nervousness from you and the audience member. I think when a person is giving speeches and can capture there audience attention the whole time then the have the ability to be great at public speaking and patricia speech did that for me so good job.

Then we all proceed back to our seats as the show began. A young man named Jaire first came to the stage and performed a song that he had written and recorded himself. It was a love song and his voice was like the voice of Usher. His vocals were outstanding, if I heard his sing before this event; I would think that the song was one if Ushers. Next there was a spoken word poem by a junior name Arissa. She spoke about the injustice going on in our community, police brutality, and the election that had not yet been deter=mined. Personally my favorite part of her speech is when she compared the flaws of h=Hilary Clinton to Donald Trump. She spoke about the dispute with Clintons email and that was the only inappropriate comment that can be used against Clinton. However, when she mentioned Donald Trump, she went on a rant. Technically, her rant was not even a rant because she was saying true statements about Trump. After she finished her spoken word poem, the entire room was just silent. I could tell the entire audience was just taking it in, that a man of his character could even be a candidate to be

Hey Anne! Right off that bat I agree with what you said about how she didn't read her speech word-for-word. This is something that is either a hit or miss, you either do it right or you do it completely wrong, with Kelly though, she had it right on the spot. The first time I watched the speech, I really didn't notice her looking at her paper at all, it was the second time around whenever I started focusing on it a lot more and I was surprised that she did it so little. Another thing that I can agree with you about is how she had constant hand motions during her speech, because this was something that I too wrote in my DB 8 post that she did wrong, With Kelly, she didn't completely mess up with her speech with her hand gestures, they were just