Keeping The Legal Drinking Age

When people turn eighteen they are finally considered an adult. They can join the army, vote, buy cigarettes or tobacco products, get a tattoo and even die for our country. Although everyone considers that person to be an adult, they are still not old enough to buy or consume alcohol. A person can be responsible enough to live on their own, make their own money, pay their own bills, and yet they are still not considered old enough to purchase or consume any type of alcohol. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would help prevent the crime and personal injuries that are caused by alcohol abuse.

Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make a lot of sense in the world. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make more sense. It would be better for the teens that drink on college campus. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because you can vote at eighteen, buy tobacco, it’ll reduce the thrill of breaking the law, evidence supports that early introduction of drinking is the safest way to reduce juvenile alcohol abuse, and college people that are not 21 drink also.

The government is conducting an idea to whether lower the minimum legal drinking age in the United States or not. Many Americans forbid the idea of legalizing the drinking age so that it would be profitable to the businesses. Likewise, there have been many advantages and disadvantages of why should the government allow young adults drink under the age of 21. To prevent this issue, many Americans have provided reasoning that will support the idea of keeping the minimum legal drinking age where it is now. The government should maintain the minimum legal drinking age in the United States at the age of 21.

Realistically, teenagers are going to drink no matter what. The minimum drinking age debate in America seems to primarily revolve around one issue: drunk driving. The increased minimum drinking age does not solve the problem of drunk driving in any real way, it just shifts drunk driving deaths into a slightly older age group. Additionally, because teenagers are afraid of getting caught drinking, many end up drinking large amounts of alcohol in short

According to Alexis Aguirre in The University Star, “Keeping the minimum legal drinking age at 21 will not dissuade young people who want to indulge in reckless alcohol intake. If anything, the age limit encourages binge drinking. Lowering the drinking age could make it easier to regulate consumption among younger adults as well as encourage healthy drinking habits” (Aguirre). Sure enough, if the drinking age were lowered to 18 it would avoid the illegal, abused intake of alcohol by 18 year olds. According to the U.S Department of Health and Human Services, “Each year, approximately 5,000 young people under the age of 21 die as a result of underage drinking” (U.S Department of Health and Human Services). A way of avoiding such tragedies is lowering the drinking age to 18, teaching younger

The drinking age should be lowered to eighteen because there has been many problems that have caused life threatening dangers to these teens. The age eighteen is where you start to become an adult so people should have the right to drink when they turn eighteen (“Drinking Age”). It also should be allowed

Many negative effects come with drinking alcohol. Since teenagers’ brains are not fully developed until they are in their mid 20’s, it is especially dangerous to them. The legal alcohol age should not be eighteen because it harms the teenage brain and body, it has negative (and potentially fatal) effects on school, and it has negative effects on driving.

The drinking age has been a controversial topic in the United States for years; should the drinking age be lowered to 18 similar to many other countries around the world? Or should the drinking age remain at 21, which has been the MLDA (minimum legal drinking age) since 1986. There for a couple of strong points for both sides on this debate. One of the strongest points for lowering the drinking age is that at 18, you’re considered a legal adult in the United States. Since the United States trusts teenagers with the ability to join the military, sign contracts, go to jail, and many other things but the United States does not allow drinking at the same age. If we also compare the drinking age with other countries around the world, one will see that the United States has a the highest drinking age in the world, and that other countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Ireland, Italy, India, France, etcetera. Some say that the minimum legal drinking age of 21 shouldn’t be changed. People who oppose lowering the drinking age say that allowing 18 year olds to drink can mess up their development and brain growth. Also, many state that the minimum legal drinking age reduces traffic accidents and fatalities. There are great points for both sides in this debate of changing the minimum legal drinking age.

There are many arguments on why the legal drinking age should be lowered to eighteen. To some, lowering the drinking age to eighteen makes sense and to others it does not make sense at all. Most people believe that if eighteen year olds are old enough to make big decisions such as enlist in the Army, Navy, or other Military services then eighteen year olds are old enough to drink also. Not only does lowering the legal drinking age put the drinker at harm but also the people around the drinker. There are so many reasons why the legal drinking age should not be lowered, never less, three valid and proven reasons why the legal drinking age should not be lowered is, the effect on the brain, the safety of the drinker and the people around them, and the number of deaths that will increase.

Statistics are just numbers until they personally impact you. Studies have shown that the law that retains the legal drinking age at 21, also known as the 21 law, saves approximately 1,00 lives a year. It is an indisputable fact that lowering the drinking age to 18 would cause teenager death rates to increase. The 21 law upholds teenager’s overall health, saves lives, and prevents addiction problems from occurring earlier in life. Lowering the drinking age would obviously have negative consequences.

Young adults need to be shown the defaults of alcohol, and they need to be aware of the results that stem from it. Many young adults think they are able to get away with drinking and partying without any repercussions. With that more accidents, deaths, judgment, and cognitive issues happen. The government and state should continue to keep the legal age as is it because that gives punishment for foolish decisions that happen. The people who fight the age need to realize that the drinking age was input to keep the teenagers away from something that could seriously hurt their future, and give a punishment for actions as well as safety of all the common public. If the age is lowered, the United States would turn into a chaotic mess. The numbers of medical problems and families affected by anything to do with alcohol would skyrocket. Teens would make decisions they never could fix ever more commonly, and this could ruin any further potential for the one young adult. The young adults are the new upcoming generation and they need to be focused, prepared, and ready not lost and

At eighteen years of age a teenager becomes an adult. They can choose to move out of their parents home, vote, marry, joining the military and buy tobacco and lottery tickets, but it isn’t illegal to purchase alcohol. However, in twenty-nine states it is legal to consume alcohol at eighteen, but not to purchase alcohol. Becoming an adult has many responsibilities; therefore, citizens should be able to drink at eighteen. The United States should lower the drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen because legally a citizen becomes an adult, less fatalities involving drinking, and help the economy.

When teens turn 18 they deserve all the rights that come with being an adult, lowering the drinking age will not only cause teens to become more responsible it will also reduce drunk driving accidents as seen in other countries who have already implemented this law.

The legal age for drinking should be raise from 21 to 25 years old. You may ask yourself why I’m saying this? Well, I think the drinking age should be increase because in my opinion people that are 25-years-old are more mature than 21-year old’s. first of all, I think there would be less crashes if the drinking age increases. There would be less people on the road getting distracted and speeding. Also, people would not fall asleep behind the wheel. A 25-year-old person knows up to what limit they can go to before driving a car. People tend to get clumsy and sleepy when drinking alcohol. Maybe a 25-year-old person is more mature than a 21-year-old and decides not to risk it by drinking and driving. In addition, I think the

Many under the age of 21 are getting in trouble with the law in alcohol related incidents, which wouldn?t take place if the drinking age was lowered. Many underage drinkers drink in more dangerous places in order to avoid law enforcement. "... when these young adults ?drink on the sly in unsupervised settings, they are