Keirsey Temperament Test Analysis

The Keirsey Temperament Sorter is the most commonly used personality instrument in the world. The Keirsey temperament is a tool that helps people better understand their personality. After taking quiz, it was revealed that I most closely resemble the Guardian temperament.

After investing my 15 minutes on this test I found that this test was not credible at all. It was just a method of luring people to know about their personality and getting hits on their website. The test was utterly meaningless. The questions seemed to be simple yet direct in the beginning but later on they became repetitive and boring. There was nothing that could make me ponder over some aspect of my own persona.

When discussing the accuracy of personality tests, there is no test, which will provide perfect precision. According to Dr. O'Neil, “an individual's personality is the complex of mental characteristics that makes them unique from other people” (2006, Para 1). O’Neil believes that the potential factors involved in shaping personality include values, beliefs, and expectations that are genetic and environmental (O’Neil, 2006).

Identifying my learning style has allowed me to make more effective decision in choosing learning strategies. By identifying my personality type has helped me evaluate the way I react to people and situations. There are two assessments available to help figure out your learning style and personality. The first is Multiple Pathways to Learning which is based on Professor Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence Theory that focuses on peoples learning strengths and preferences. The second is The Personality Spectrum based on the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory which identifies which personality

Everybody has his or her own type of personality. We all act in a certain way that makes us who we are. It is believed that our parents, peers and, the environment we grow up in, shape us. Personality is describes as a combination of emotions, attitude, and behavioral patterns of an individual. There is a reason that we are the way we are and there are many theories that go along with that. Different theorist present their own definitions of the word personality based on their own theoretical positions. Which brings us to discussing Carl Jung’s theory of analytical psychology and Harry

If the response to a test defines you in a certain way, think very carefully about how you answered the questions because the answers you provide to the questions reveal what you actually [think you] would do, which

During my time in my senior seminar class, I took a personality test that gave me

My results were nine out of thirty-three my score was average. I answered the questions truthfully, considering I’m a psychology major, but I knew the wrong answers was wrong. I could have answered the incorrect question that way the author of the assessment test, correctly. I didn’t want to cheat my true feelings in order to gain least incorrect answers. I normally don’t seek the approval of others in what I say or do, but I did think I would have gotten least wrong answers. I do agree with my results, I show an average degree of concern for the social desirability. I agree with the fact I conform to social rules and conventions.

I first became familiar with the Keirsey Temperament Sorter when taking a psychology class last semester. After recently discussing the Barnum effect in that class, I was skeptical to review the results that may just give vague, general descriptions that could fit anyone. I didn't want to read to much into my temperament style description and let it control my actions and beliefs. However, after receiving my results and reviewing the material, I found that the assessment is very accurate and I could connect specifically to many of the descriptions presented. It even helped explain why I wanted to become a teacher. In addition to taking the Keirsey Temperament Sorter then, I also completed it three other times over the summer as part of my final

I scored 2.18 in the hostile sexism category and 3.09 in the benevolent category (average scores) indicating that I have low levels of hostile sexism and I don’t hold negative stereotypes about career women and I don’t tolerate issues surrounding domestic violence, sexual harassment etc. My low levels of benevolent sexism indicate that I would not blame a woman who’s rapped because she dressed too revealing. My race test suggests little to no automatic preference between European American and African American. I fell in the 12% category with other test takers. I love all people despite ethnicity. Diversity is what makes the world a beautiful place. My gender test suggests a moderate association of male with career and female with family compared to female with career and male with family. I fell in the 15% category with other test takers. I know my upbringing was a factor in my gender test results as my father was the head and provider of our house and my mother was the homemaker. I want to believe that my historical, individual and social structure were the determining factors of my test

Before taking the personality test, I really wondered what personality I have, because I have not thought deeply about my character. Through this test, I am able to think more about my personality, and it was great opportunity to look back on my past time. My score in the Kiersey Temperamentsorter II is that I am a Guardian. It means that they serve and preserve the most important social situations. They tend to keep running smoothly in families, communities, schools, churches, and hospitals. One of their characteristics is that they often have duty and cautiousness on traditions and credentials. Also, they have a pride with being hard-working and helpful. Besides, they like to have fun with their friends and families, but they pretty take

Overall, I believe that the test was fairly accurate in measuring certain factors of my personality so much so that it was difficult for me to find certain factors that I did not agree with. However there were two factors, E (dominance) and Q1 (rebelliousness), which I believe were a bit overrated in myself. Aside from these the test seemed to adequately define facets of my personality. For “warmth” (factor A) my sten score read 4, indicating that I am slightly more reserved and critical that easygoing and good-natured. I scored a 7 in “ego strength” (factor C), classifying me as more stable and emotionally mature and less emotional and changeable in attitudes. In dominance (factor E) my sten score read 8, meaning I am more assertive, competitive and stubborn rather than submissive, dependent and humble. I received an average score of 5 in “impulsivity” (factor F) indicating a slightly more serious and sober approach to the world over the cheerful and enthusiastic view. As for “boldness” (factor H), I received a sten score of 4 signifying a more shy and restrained approach to things as opposed to an adventurous genial one. I received a median score of 5 for “emotional sensitivity” (factor I) demonstrating my slightly more tough-minded and self-reliant view in contrast to a sensitive insecure one. For “imagination” (factor M) a score of 8, indicating that I am more imaginative, unconventional and absorbed in ideas and am less so for practicality and the prosaic.

Everyone has their own characteristics that set them apart. The way they act, think, and feel gives them their own individual personality. But what if you could learn exactly what type of person you are? That is what intrigued me when I heard about the Enneagram system. I have taken personality quizzes before, but none were as accurate as the Enneagram. By taking this quiz, I learned more about myself than I realized I knew. The largest components of this questionnaire are the center, wings, and arrows. One’s personality is more complex than it seems. Even though I am classified to a particular group, I blend into other types similar to mine. Along with the Enneagram questionnaire, I completed a Learning Styles survey. This survey also

There comes a time when we all come across a specific test such as school tests, driving test, or even as simple as food tasting test. However, there is a difference between regular tests and testing’s when referring to psychological testing. There are several different psychological tests that many psychiatrists, psychologists, and school counselors use to determine certain abilities, however each of the tests are used for a specific purpose. It is vital for the individuals to contain high knowledge of the tests before applying it to others.

When it comes to objective tests, it is implied that they are accurate, precise, and resistant to biased influences. Scoring errors are another potential concern. In reviewing the projective test, it is determined by Meyer and Kurtz (2006) that one‘s personality will not shine through with force and clarity regardless of the medium, the presence of the client’s responses confuses the efforts to interpret the test scores, and that is what the psychologists are most interested in interpreting (Meyer & Kurtz, 2006)