Kemari's Case Study

* Baby social worker visited. Plan is to initiate care proceedings ASAP reasons; history of substance misuse, concealed pregnancy, poor engagement with treatment and services

Child C is a seven year old boy. Having read through the referral form I am aware that Child C had been displaying aggressive and angry behaviour in school. He comes from an unsettled home life and has experienced a high level of domestic violence within his family home. Child C has spent time living with his grandmother

Sabastian was ordered to have weekly weight checks. It is believed that Gabriella and Shomari do not feed Sabastian properly. There were also concerns about the white area of Sabastian’s eye. The process had begun to refer Sabastian to a specialist. Sabastian was last seen 2/21/18; a visit was scheduled for the week of 2/26-3/2/18, but he had the flu. Gabriella and Shomari received new parent support, 1 on 1 parent support with basic infant care and being able to parent. Although Gabriella and Shomari received parenting support, they were unable to demonstrate what they’ve learned. Gabriella and Sabastian moved to MS to live with Rhonda (maternal grandmother) on 3/3/18. Shomari remains in North Carolina waiting to be discharged from the Navy. After being discharged Shomari will also move to MS. Rhonda is a social worker; she has guardianship of Gabriella’s oldest son (unknown). Jessica spoke with Gabriella the morning of 3/5/18; Gabriella confirmed that she and Sabastian had made it to MS. Jessica informed Gabriella that she needed to continue to follow up with Sabastian’s weekly weight

The client Suzanne is a seven year old girl placed in a treatment center for emotionally disturbed children. This center helps children ages six through twelve years old. Suzanne has been diagnosed with an attachment disorder and has been placed in a group home for two years. There are two types of attachment disorders, attachment and reactive attachment (Smith, 2014). She has been meeting with a facility caseworker weekly for the last eight months. Her three year old sister, Cindy, is also placed in the facility with her. Parental rights are currently being processed to be terminated. The caseworker is looking into alternative long-term placement for the sisters. Each sister has a

Mother explained that the client studies but takes the exam fast. PP and FF asked if the school makes adjustments for the client since he has an IEP. Mother shared she doesn’t know. PP encouraged mother to talk to the teachers and make sure the client has his academics needs. Mother agreed to talk to the teachers and once CFS comes back from leave he will go to the school too. FF and PP went over family concerns, ways the wrap team can support them and mission statement. Client shared that he would like to improve his grades to participate in a school sport. PP and FF praised the client for wanting to improve his academics and want to participate in a school sport. Mother expressed her mission is to close her case and not reopen. PP praised mother for sharing and wanting to close her case and leave in the pass. Mother expressed concerns over client behavior at home and school. Mother shared that client talks back and doesn’t follow directions at home. Client shared that he doesn’t like to be the only child doing chores at home. Client shared that he gets frustrated and talks back to mother. Mother expressed that she relies on the client a lot to do chores because he is the oldest. PP

Social Services Meeting: On 11/21/2016, Ms. Medina and her children met with her assigned Case Manager for the family ILP Document Review. Ms. Medina is expected to meet with assigned Case Manage bi-weekly. Ms. Medina’s next ILP Document Review is on 12/05/2016. Case Manager encouraged Ms. Medina to continue attending meetings. Ms. Medina stated that she was a sad and upset, due to that her doctor informed her that she is not going to be able to work as a Home Health Aid due to a back injury. Ms. Medina stated that her doctor recommended that she would benefit from physical therapy and that she should avoid to lift anything heavy until further notice.

CPSW did a home visit to meet with Ms. Berner and to discuss about her safety plan since the children are moving with her on10/29/16 from the foster provider. Ms. Berner was late for her appointment and CPSW waited a 40 minutes for Ms. Berner. Ms. Berner apologized for being late. CPSW explained Ms. About safety plan. Ms. Berner understood and she signed them. Ms. Berner stated that she will be doing a house arrest for two weeks and the recommendation of her criminal court is to obey law and continue taking her medication on time and seeing her therapist. Also, cooperating with her PO and CPSW. CPSW consulted with the supervisor and she has approved both children to move back with Ms. Berner. Goal 1-2

The writer help the consumer to complete intake paperwork at Northeast Guidance Center the consumer is a DD and does have problem with reading, and writing. The consumer report during his assessment that he would like to have income, go back to WCCC and have a place of his own. The consumer also states that his mother was murdered when he was young and he live with his aunt whom he call mom and his cousin who often time treat him mean. The consumer is also unable to get around catching the bus because he does have problem reading. The consumer next appointment for his treatment plan is schedule on 01/03/16 at 9:00am. The consumer health insurance has expired so he is unable to get transportation to his appointment. The writer will assist the

All other educational and/or related costs will be paid by the family on Travis’ behalf. BISD will complete the full individual re-evaluation (FIE) previously proposed in the April 2015 ARD Committee meeting, and outlined in the Notice of Proposal to Evaluate dated April 20, 2015, by May 15, 2016. Within thirty (30) days following the completion of all the evaluation reports, if not earlier, BISD will conduct an ARD Committee meeting on behalf of Travis to review the evaluation. BISD will fund an independent educational evaluation in the area of psycho-educational by an evaluator of the parent’s choice who successfully complete any and all background and credentials checks, fingerprinting, and contract submission to BISD in an amount not to exceed $3,650.00 within 30 days upon receipt of both an invoice and the completed evaluation report. BISD agrees to pay reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $3,672.00 within 30 days of the full and final execution and Board approval of this Agreement and receipt of a detailed billing statement in support of the fee request for attorney fees and

Ms. Henderson notes that during the assessment process Aunika was placed with her for an evening, but was then removed and placed into foster care. She reports being confused by this decision, as her nephew, the son of her fiancé, was able to stay in the placement at her home with her and his biological father, Glenn Stillmen. I discussed with Ms. Henderson the difference between placing a child with a legal parent, which I clarified with her, Mr. Stillman is, and placing a child with a relative, which would be what the placement between she and Aunika, would be. I clarified further, that with a relative placement there are certain certification requirements that must be reached in order for the child to reside there, while they are a ward of the courts and DHS Child Welfare is charged with their safety. She seemed to understand this and asserted that she would like to be a placement option for Aunika and that she would like information regarding doing this. At this time I

The DD Waiver intake was held at the Woodman office with Jordan, Grandmother/Legal Guardian Carolyn and, Uncle/Consumer Direct Assistant Robert. Jordan is a 9 year old in a contained classroom. He loves electronics and watching videos. He communicates through body gestures, and becomes easily agitated when he is not comfortable. With the combination of medications Grandmother states his head banging, biting, hitting others has gotten better.

Keziah is a 4 month old female with hx of complete AVC s/p surgical repair on 10/03/17. She is currently in heomdynamically stable junctional ectopic tachycardiac which is commonly enocuntered problem in the first few days after cardiac surgery.

These needs are addressed by individual work in the Centre, family homes and other settings, Co-Working on a multi-agency basis, and specific groups and courses to address particular needs, e.g. Parenting Courses and Young Parents Groups. A tailored package of support is available to the Service User. The Initial Assessment Team Social Worker made a request for Family Support work to help Tommy (names have been changed) and his family, under Section 17 CA1989, which states that a child shall be considered to be a Child in Need if: a) He is unlikely to achieve or maintain, or to have the opportunity of achieving or maintaining a reasonable standard of health and development without the provision for him of such services by the local authority b)

You are concerned about the behaviour of one of the children with whom you are involved. You believe that this is due to learning development problems, and suspect this may be due to underlying medical issues.

The third priority issue the social will address is getting assistance to Maria with her son Marco and employment. Marco was diagnosed with autism at age 4 and now is no longer in school having Maria “overwhelmed.” Maria has lost her job and her medical insurance. The first thing will be getting Marco evaluated by a doctor to make the decision of what care is appropriate for him. Having the communication with Marco primary doctor will be important. Maria stating she does not know “what to do with him” confirms her unknown knowledge of the resources in her community that can be a help for her. There has been previous investigations that has strongly imply that mothers with