preview

Ken Macrorie's Weekly Readings Analysis

Satisfactory Essays

Ken Macrorie in both his weekly readings descibes the writing process of college students to be filled with lies and to be lifeless. He emphasizes that good writing is truthful writing not stained with lies (fluffy writing) from the writer.
Anne Lamott one the other hand describes the writing process to be basically trail and errors and puts a huge emphasis on the trail portion.
Ken Macrorie's weekly readings actually honestly shocked me and opened my eyes to engfish. As I read Ken Macrorie's readings at first I found myself denying the existence of engfish, however as I continued to read I realized that not only did engfish exist but I myself had learned to master it to get good grades in school.
While reading Anne Lamott's weekly reading I found myself screeming in my hand the phrase "So true!" as I empathiszed with the writer knowing exactly how she felt with the frustating process of writing a decent essay or anything for that matter. …show more content…

However I now understand hat enfish does indeed exist as a academic writing problem that affects many students including myself. I now realize that engfish doesnt only affect the education system it also affects our society.
We no longer use the word "old" to describe an seventy year old person instead we choose to describe an old person as an "elderly". Another exmple of engfish in our society is when someone gets runned over but on the charges they call it "Vehicular mansluaghter". Engfish can be described to be the process of changing the words in a sentence to make it sound more pretentiouse or phony, which is exacly what happens in society common words to describe something are changed to be longer and as a result these new words sound lifeless and

Get Access