Kennedy and the Balance of Payment
Assignment 1- FINA6676-2
1/30/2014
Hang Pham- A00366703
What is President Kennedy’s U.S. balance of payment problem?
In the 1960s, the United States was experiencing the balance of payment problem when its trade balance was in a substantial deficit, the US dollar was under an attack and a massive amount of gold flew out of its official reserve. Such issues in the balance of payment if exist for a long time can be a threat to the whole economy because balance of payment closely interacts with key macroeconomic variables such as GDP, exchange rates, interest rates and inflation rates. However, it was not an easy task for the Kennedy government to solve the balance of payment problem as
…show more content…
The third option to solve balance of payment problem was to impose trade barriers and capital control. On one hand, this would help to restrict import and capital outflow, thereby recover the trade deficit. On the other hand, this policy was contrary to U.S. effort to liberalize the world trade. Economic growth of the U.S and its allies would also be affected.
All three options directly address problem of the current accounts and financial and capital accounts. While deflation and capital control can remedy both current account and financial and capital accounts, devaluation only has immediate impacts on the current account. (Figure 1 bellow illustrates direct impacts of each option to these accounts.) However, as exchange rates, interest rates, economic growth and balance of payments are interacted, when one components of the balance of payment improves, the other accounts will also recover. For example, when import demand increases, demand for the dollar also increases, and therefore can prevent the outflow of gold from official reserve. That being said, all three options can solve U.S balance of payment problem; however, there must be cost incurred that Kennedy government have to consider.
Figure 1
Question 3:
Can any lesson be drawn from President Kennedy’s balance of payment problem in the 1960s to address the
Apply the Exclusionary rule to each of these three items of evidence and state whether or not the item should be excluded from evidence based on the Exclusionary Rule. If you selected any that WOULD be excluded, please explain why.
results of the debt. It is a look at both the factual causes and the arguments
Debtor Nation: The History of America in Red Ink takes us on a journey through the history of debt in America throughout the twentieth century. The history of debt is not something that most people typically think about when they reflect on the history of America. The author does a great job of allowing the reader to witness how each type of debt that we are accustomed to today originated. Each chapter serves as a timeline to help the reader see how debt transformed over the century. We see the initial form of borrowing with retailers offering credit to their customers with no fees (10), to a profitable system where extremely high interest rates were imposed by “loan sharks,” prompting enforcement of regulations (14), all the way through to the late 1990s where two-thirds of American households had
All day and all night, they battled the emergency with each instrument available to them to keep the United States and world economies above water. Working with two U.S. presidents, and under flame from a crabby Congress and an open angered by conduct on Wall Street, the Fed—nearby associates in the Treasury Department—effectively settled a wavering monetary framework. With inventiveness and definitiveness, they kept a financial fall of incomprehensible scale and went ahead to create the strange projects that would resuscitate the U.S. economy and turn into the model for different nations. Rich with detail of the basic leadership prepare in Washington and permanent representations of the real players, The Courage to Act relates and clarifies the most exceedingly bad budgetary emergency and monetary droop in America since the Great Depression, giving an insider 's record of the approach reaction (http://www.forbes.com/sites/richardsalsman/2012/03/06/five-financial-reforms-that-would-prevent-crises-and-promote-prosperity/#).
When it comes to the supply of money, different actions are taken to assure stability in our country. To ensure we are keeping consistent with the loss in value of currency throughout the years, the Federal Reserve changes either the inflation or the interest rates so that prices will be able to balance the debt amount. With actions like such, there are purposes sought by the Federal Reserve Act set toward “the Board of Governors and the Federal Open Market Committee…: to promote… the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates” (Federal Reserve). These are a matter of acts under the monetary policy. However, today in America, we are still suffering from the continuous increase in our national debt, a problem that has been growing since the start of the new century.
Our nation faces many problems, and has for many years. Today’s generations, and especially the mainstream media, seem most concerned with social issues such as abortion and same sex marriage. While these issues are important, our economic situation should receive more urgent attention. Americans are desperate for better days, but lack a meaningful understanding of how our financial system works. Almost 100 years ago, the creation of the Federal Reserve Banking System was instated. One could argue that this system is the base of why we are 18 trillion dollars in debt, and rising. The Federal Reserve Banking System has contributed
Eight decades has elapsed since the outbreak of the Great Depression, but the continuing mystery of its cause keep provoking academic debates among scholars from various fields. Eichengreen and Temin joint the debates by linking the gold-standard ideology with the cause of the Great Depression. They content that because of this ideology monetary and fiscal authorities implemented deflationary policies when the hindsight shows clearly that expansionary policies were needed. And these contractionary policies consequently pushed the stumbling world economy into the Great Depression. Eichengreen and Temin put heavy weight on analyzing why the prewar gold standard could be a force for international financial stability while interwar gold
In the book Hamilton’s Blessing, Gordon uses economic history and theory to explore the start, rise and decline of the United States debt. Gordon opens his book by stating that this country was born in debt, and this debt has become so high that concerned individuals no longer think of it. Throughout the book, he traces the history of the national debt dating back from 1791, when the central bank of the United States was created, up to modern days. The intellectual architect of this creation was Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary as well as a central figure who had a deep impact on the economic development of the United States. The title of the book clearly recalls Hamilton's statement that a national debt, "if not excessive,
Machiavelli would mostly disapprove of John F. Kennedy as a leader. He would disapprove of John F. Kennedy ‘concerning cruelty and clemency’, and ‘concerning things for which men, especially princes, are praised or blamed’. On the other hand, he would approve that JFK was right in ‘that one should avoid being despised and hated’.
Since the nation’s very beginning, it has carried a debt from the American Revolution. Only once in the entire U.S. history has been the debt zero, during President Andrew Jackson’s administration in the 1830’s. President Jackson set a budget like the other future and past presidents, but actually stayed within its parameters. However, the debt kept growing after his presidency and reached $18 trillion dollars today. The world has changed a lot since the 1830’s, the methods used during that period can no longer be the solution in 2015 because there are just too many factors that must be considered. The size and the population of the country have changed dramatically, foreign relationships are far more complicated and broader, and people’s expectations of the government are different.
Bipolar I disorder, or formally known as manic-depression disorder, is a mental disorder in which a person experiences frequent mood swings that can drastically change the direction of one’s life. Individuals with bipolar disorders experience unusual, dramatic mood swings, and activity levels that go from periods of feeling intensely happy, irritable, and impulsive to periods of intense sadness and feelings of hopelessness, thus affecting behavior in some ways. According to nimh.nih.gov (2012), bipolar I disorder can result in damaged relationships, poor job or school performances, and even suicide. The disorder impacts the mental, physical, emotional, and cognitive aspects of one’s life.
In order to uncover the source of the problem, the history that brought The Fed to the extreme power it holds today must
During the 1980s, the Baker and Brady Plans were initiated to alleviate developing countries debts. The former plan called upon financial institutions to increase lending to developing countries by up to 50% and the latter plan sought to annul debt through collaboration with private-sector lenders. Developing countries’ debt problems became known as debt overhang whereby the “presence of existing ‘inherited’ debt” exacerbated the debtor countries’ economic hardships. While the Baker Plan was largely ineffective, the Brady Plan helped revive the Third World debt market and the composition of capital flows in the Brady countries shifted away from the public sector to the private sector in the form of foreign direct investment (FDI) and equity.
part of the answer to this problem is to put prisoners to work. It makes no sense to deprive inmates of work, especially since they owe serious debts to others, including times, "outmates" and taxpayers. Yet our jails and prisons do little or nothing to provide productive work opportunities. Once upon a time, the common wisdom was that prisoners should work but now it's mostly banned. Opponents claim that it's unfair
It is often suggested that the large current account deficit poses a serious financing problem for the United States. Each year, the lament goes, the United States must attract net inflows of capital sufficient to "cover" the huge current shortfall. But this proposition gets the logic backward: the U.S. deficit is "financed" by net capital inflows only in an ex post accounting sense. In economic terms it is more nearly correct to say that net capital inflows cause the current account deficit. (p. 218)