Key Components Of Achievement Motivation Theory And Effectiveness Within Organisations

One of the oldest debates in the history of Psychology is about Nature versus Nurture. Today, we know that both play a significant role in human’s life. Some people believe that it is genes which affects our way of life and some people believes that it is none other but our environment that greatly influences our lifestyle and some believe that both has tremendous impact on one’s way of life. Indeed in certain cases both our nature (our genes) and our environment roughly play an equal role in human life.

The biggest controversy in psychology today is whether genetics or one’s environment plays a role in the behavior of the individual. Psychologists have researched and developed different theories to explain the reason for the way humans think and behave. The behavior of individuals is either inherited or learned. In my opinion, I believe that nurture plays a big role in the individual’s behavior. Kendra Cherry states, “Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture” (1). People have become who there are because of the environment they were exposed to in their childhood years. The behavior of people is influenced be the environment that surrounds them and can changed many times through one’s lifetime. People have different personalities a person’s

The nature vs nurture issue has been a controversial argument among psychologist for decades. This argument exposes two different views. One of them emphasizes that our personality depends solely on genetics (nature). On the other hand, the second view suggests that humans “develop through experience” (Myers 2013, SG 6) (nurture).

The article was written by Sharon Begley, who is a science writer. It published on December 1, 2008, and it has been illustrated by Harry Campbell for Newsweek. We always think our personality is related to our genes, which is stable or cannot be changed. However, Begley assume we can change our personality as we grow up. It depends on environment and our parents. They both play a great role in shaping our personality.

Theoretical Propositions: The question of why people are who they are and why they behave the in the way that they do was asked. The researchers wanted to understand if people develop into who they are primarily from factors in the environment or because of there genetic makeup. In the second half of the 20th century most psychologists agreed in the theory of behaviorism, human behavior is caused only by factors in the environment. This study would answer the common “nurture vs nature” question that many people still ask today.

1.2 Analyse the three principle dimensions of employee engagement (the emotional, the cognitive and the physical)

When we look at the science of human development, the main consideration is how people change over time. In the age old question of nature versus nurture, there are some that believe the characteristics and traits within us are innate, meaning we are born with them. Still others feel that nurturing, our environmental influences like friends, community, schools, media and even parents affect who we are. This is a false dichotomy, it is not which-but how much of each because both play crucial roles in our development (Berger 2015).

Every human being is unique. Were we destined to be the way we are, or have we been made this way through our environment and experiences? Psychology has long been debating the issue of Nature versus Nurture. Characteristics such as hair and eye color are generally recognized to be controlled by genetics. Those on the Nature side (Nativists) claim that genetics control much more, including personality and character. Nurture backers (empiricists) will argue that a person’s environment and experiences determine those traits. So is it possible to prove which side is right? The latest findings suggest that the debate may not be that simple.

Human characters and traits can be shaped by heredity or environmental factors; in other words, it can be the result of genes and or the result of life experiences. Genes play a big role in determining our physical appearances like heights and colors, but the important question is: do the same genes that determine our genotype, tendencies toward traits such as humor, violence, likes and dislikes, hyperactivity and homosexuality. This debate has been One of the biggest debates in psychology; It’s The nature-nurture controversy; heredity vs. environment. In mental development science, there is a solid suggestion that nature and nurture interact to produce every specific trait; no characteristic develops as an exclusive response to either nature

Your life is built on what you see, what you do, and what you think. This, inevitably, morphs and overlaps to create your personality, a concept sometimes hard to grasp. A personality develops through your life experiences, each changing your perception of the world. Many of the things you experience as a child, though seeming insignificant, are the bases to explain your actions. With this in consideration, family teachings, culture, and environment are major factors in the shape of someone’s future and identity.

"Only in rare cases of extreme isolation is it possible to observe concretely separated two factors in the development of human personality which are always otherwise only analytically separated, the biogenic and the

For many years scientists have had this question, “Nature or Nurture?” It is an unsolved argument but there have been many studies and new information that explain just how and why each of these are important in personality development. After researching about this topic it is clear that when it comes to personality development, new studies have proven that while Nature does have some affect on one’s disposition, Nurture by far has a greater effect on the development of one’s personality.

The global economy is constantly changing, due to globalisation and the innovation of technology. With the expansion of global trading and supplying, the need to gain a competitive advantage over other competitors is a constant requirement. It has been stated that ‘this century demands more efficiency and productivity than any other time in history’ (Kompaso, et al., 2010). A challenge for employers in today’s economy is the retention of a workforce, though; it can also be seen as a competitive advantage. Retaining a workforce is essential for short-term and long-term sustainability of an organisation. Though, the challenge of retaining a workforce is finding the strategies to keep them. Motivation theories, such as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and Locke’s Goal Setting Theory, through a combination of extrinsic and intrinsic motives, have helped increase productivity levels in employees. Though, for the retention of employees, it encompasses a lot more than just promoting output levels, the engagement of a workforce is essential. Employee engagement is a relatively new concept, basically defined as ‘the individual’s involvement and satisfaction as well as enthusiasm for work’ (Harter, et al., 2003). There has been little academic research into the topic (Saks, 2006), which has limited the development of models or theories to relevantly explain and give direction in executing employee engagement (Saks, 2006). Though, greater levels of employee engagement are linked with the

Developing a unique personality is a process by temperament, environment, and character. Some characteristics are already pre-determined by genetics. On the other hand, some characteristics are the result of how a child is brought up in his or her environment. Finally, the third aspect is character. Character is how a child thinks and grows morally. The forming of personality has long been a main argument of the nature versus nurture debate. Multiple of today’s psychologists and sociologists have said that neither nature or nurture can be the sole answer of how a person is the way they are. It is the balance between nature and nurture.

Some psychological models assert that a proportion of our personality is inborn and permanent (Hollander, 1971), that a psychological core at the center of our personality gives us enduring, inner characteristics. Hans Eysenck (1965) suggests that our motivation and emotion are related to biological differences in brain function and proposed that 75% of our personality is based on genetic influence and 25% on environmental influence. Research by Peter Whybrow (1999) on identical twins separated at birth examined how their different environments shaped their personalities. He found that around 40% of personality should be credited to genetics, with 60% determined by outside factors.