Kids Are Killing The English Language Analysis

From generations to generation grammar has been a big part of the English language. It has also changed since it first develops. From texting complete sentences like “See you later” to “C U l8r” or from using the spelling two and using the number form of it to replace that. Using slang word such as those can ruin a person’s reputation. In the stories of The Joy of Texting by Lynne Truss and I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why. by Kyle Wiens, both show some main similarities for it uses of correct grammar and why it should be that way. Grammar can make or break a person and could cost serious chances in life.

Within the essay, “But What Do You Mean?”, author Deborah Tannen explains several main areas of miscommunication between men and women. Within her article, she goes section-by-section comparing men and women’s preferred style of communication. She concludes that while men and women may communicate differently, neither are wrong. To address this concern, she suggests using language both parties can understand. On the other hand, in William Lutz article, “The World of Doublespeak,” he takes a different approach to language discrepancies. Lutz introduces the idea of doublespeak as inherently negative. He starts by proceeding to discuss types of doublespeak subcategory-by-subcategory. Within his subcategories, he gives various real-world examples from various aspects of communication. The conclusion Lutz resolves to claims that doublespeak impedes communication, and thus should be eliminated. Overall, despite both authors exploring aspects of language the tone, categorization, and conclusions are different.

Having poor grammar skills leaves one with the incapability to clearly speak or write and be correctly understood. Technology is destroying grammar skills of the adolescents generations. Texting has us turning grammar into shorthand sentences. For instance, using the number two as a short form for “to”. In the article “Does Grammar Really Matter?”, Mignon Fogarty writes, “let’s say you sent your company president an e-mail

Increased use of technology is bringing the decreased use of grammatical uprightness. No one spells out words anymore, it’s just not ‘cool’ or ‘convenient’. When the new technological-reliant generation goes into the real world, and actually has frequent conversations, their grammatical and sentence formulating skills will be below average. A lack of formal linguistic practice

As I began to search for an article in the paper to write about that interested me, I was immediately drawn to a title that threw me off; "Why Kids Can't Write," by Dana Goldstien. Considering myself a kid I decided it would be worth a read to try and decipher what I agreed with in the article and what I did not. Early on in the article, the author begins talking about the probable root of the issue; how kids are being taught. She says, "Focusing on the fundamentals of grammar is one approach to teaching writing. But it's by no means the dominant one." As early as second grade, I remember learning grammar, spelling, and punctuation. When deciding what to write about, the topic of discussion was what one did over the weekend, or had for dinner

It was amazing to see how all of the children came together to perform this show. They all have unique talents such as the ability to sing or play a musical instrument. When talking about one of the boys, the teacher said that if he was not autistic, just imagine the possibilities he could have. However, this boy still has so many possibilities ahead of him. Just because he is different, it does not mean that he cannot achieve greatness. One thing I learned from the children was that they really just want someone to listen to them and to be present on their level. This was shown through Neal’s comment towards his mother about wanting her to listen to him more. Just because he could not communicate, did not mean he did not have interests or preferences that he wanted her to know about. By being present with them at the level they are at, shows the children that we care about the things they care about and it is a way

Mignon Fogarty exceeded my expectations in her book for ‘quick and dirty’ grammar tips. Personally, the most exciting information in this book was located in the “Dirty Words” section where she provided a great deal of information on commonly misused words. This section provides a great directive to words with similar spellings or definitions; additionally, a great deal of her “versus” paragraphs allowed a better understanding of their rules and exceptions. It was surprising, for me, to read Fogarty’s email and twitter etiquette tips. These guidelines helped provide a more modern feel for readers. She connects with her audience by using a lot of her own experiences to help teach readers. Fogarty uses many examples to provide a friendly comparison

Learning any language takes time, practice and comprehension to communicate effectively. As children, we develop a list of basic words, their definitions, as well as develop the ability to properly conform simple sentences. We acquire this knowledge simply by focusing on our surroundings. As we grow and embrace our personal surroundings of education, we expand the familiarity and information needed for communication. However, to further enhance our knowledge of correct language, it is necessary to have education centers and schools that teach us the proper guidelines to write and speak effectively. Nonetheless, on the other hand, as we obtain a sense of when, how, and why in certain phrases, at that point, we have the potential to bend the rules a little bit and inaccurately expand our horizons of communication. This is when doublespeak originates and has the ability to destroy the proper function of language.

MacNeil explains that all of our actions as a community is corrupting the way we talk. The influence of media is also conforming to the new ways of the english language therefore corrupting everyone involved. With theses

Five Sentence Summary In “Why Good English Is Good for You” John Simon reasons that being well spoken is vital. While one may get one’s point across, there is a correct and an incorrect way to do so. We as humans have to be aware that the obstacle of improper English can only be mended by ourselves. Even as language is evolving through the mass media, it is important to hold one’s English at a high standard.

Teenagers have always been at the forefront of language change, reflecting their fleeting and changing

In "Texting and Creating Screenagers", Erin Jansen (2011) discusses how language nowadays is being used by teenagers. First, most teenagers prefer to use online texting as a way of language usage. This way encourages kids to communicate, as well as write without even noticing. Using shortcuts also helps them with the writing process as it allows them to express more in less time. However, these shortcuts and texts do affect students' education to a point where some students can't differentiate between formal and informal English, which teachers aren't happy about. On the other hand, the author wants parents and instructors to appreciate how kids have contributed to the evolvence of the style in the writing culture. Overall, supporting this

Spoken Language in my opinion follows a different set of rules to written language in this essay I am going to explore the ways spoken language is used by television interviewers. I will be using the political chat show This Week as an example of the spoken language on TV chat shows. This Week is a political and current affairs chat show broadcasted every Thursday night on BBC one. The show is presented by former editor of the Sunday Times Andrew Neil and is accompanied every week by ex Conservative Party Member Michael Portillo.

“There are many instances, however, where reality and what we are taught do not correspond as to actual “correctness”, the actual acceptability, of what we are told to avoid”, states Hall (14). The liberal view is amoral because there is no standard for anyone using language and grammar. There is an attitude of nonchalance when analyzing what the linguist believes, therefore what is socially acceptable will work, for the linguist. Hall also states, “It is easy, on the one hand, to see that those who talk or advertise in this way and offer to cure our errors in pronunciation or grammar are simply appealing to our sense of insecurity with regard to our own speech.” The idea that linguists believe correct pronunciation and grammar usage being enforced affects one’s insecurity is amoral. The criticism of grammar and speech should encourage a person to use the correct rules and pronunciation which can lead to building confident speakers and writers. If linguist continue to find correcting affecting insecurities, individuals will never understand why preserving language is so

The English language is no different than it was a century ago; however, it has been culturally changing over the past few decades. It is common knowledge to humans that each ethnicity has their own formal language they speak and that they perceive various styles of language in different manners. Language style is the choice of words used by a specific group of people when they speak. Although we have the ability to speak to everyone in the same proper way, naturally we, including myself, tend to change our speech depending on where we are, who we are associated with, and the situation we are encountered in.