King Arthur Research Paper

The Once and Future King, or King Arthur, is a legend that is, despite its age, known by all. Everyone has heard of King Arthur and his loyal knights that make up the Round Table, but the rest of the famous legend is less known. If asked about Arthur’s parentage or birthplace, most people would not know. How many people can name off Arthur’s knights? Everyone knows Arthur’s name, but the details are less defined. Arthurian legend has many parts, the first being how Arthur came into being, then the most well-known part of the legend, but there is also his famous knights, the possibility of a historical Arthur, and how the legend has evolved over the ages.

Since very few individuals could write, stories of Arthur were mainly told by word of mouth. Oral stories did not get written down until later; Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote down the stories as one of the first written manuscript of Arthurian legend in 1139. Word of mouth was the way in which Arthur's story is passed down through the years, and it is safe to assume that during that time, the story transformed and evolved. Stories are embellished and added to, depending on the audience, in order to make it more exciting. As discussed before in this paper, local tradition had placed Camelot in an area that was proven

King Arthur is an outstanding British leader of the 5th and the 6th centuries, son of Uther Pendragon and the Lady Igraine. Arthur is one of the greatest mythical heroes that the world has ever known. Arthur has had a great influence on other people and many of them looked up to him. The coming of Arthur was prophesied years before he was even born. Arthur was born into a world of chaos and disorder, full of love and tragedy. Nowadays, many of the scholars continue to argue whether or not King Arthur was a real person or just a mythological figure. Based on facts however, many believe that Arthur was not a real person; just a legendary British leader in the 5th and 6th centuries. According to history, there wasn't anyone named King Arthur

The Arthurian legends are well known in today's society. However, very few people know of the "real" Arthur -- who he was and what his accomplishments were. This paper will establish a difference between legend and truth, show evidence to support and explain who the real Arthur was, and shed some light on the sometimes confusing Arthurian legends.

The legend of King Arthur is undoubtedly one of the most famous stories of all time. People from all walks of life know the tales of his courage and loyalty, his knights and the search for the Holy Grail. But, the big question is, was King Arthur a real person? In 540 CE, Gildas, a Welsh Historian, reported that near the turn of the century there was a great warrior named Ambrosius who stopped the Anglo-Saxons from taking over the western part of Britain. Gildas never directly said he was a commander of the army but did imply he was responsible for the victory at the Battle of Badon. He also never mentions if Ambrosius was a king. This was the most solid evidence found that would lead to the conclusion that Arthur was real. There are other

Most Americans recall lying gleefully in front of the television, arms and legs splayed across the carpet, enchanted by an eccentric cartoon of Merlin’s antics. A few of us might even remember Gawain’s short segment from Between the Lions on PBS. King Arthur’s legend is certainly many a child’s favorite fairytale, but some historians propose that a fairytale is all King Arthur is. Significant evidence, such as a lack of credibility and personality consistency, prove their points. However, according to other historians, there is still reason to believe in Arthur’s legend. Without one examining both sides of the argument and Arthur’s role in history, it is impossible to determine whether Arthur is fact or fiction.

King Arthur is a legendary medieval, mythological figure who was the head of the Kingdom of

Many people looked up to him, and praised him for all of the success he had in battles, ruling England, and his life choices. I believe that he is a legend, not a real person, for many different reasons. First, in many stories he is described with these amazing powers, some seem too unbelievable for any average human to have. Also, he is involved in numerous battles which some occur at the same time. This meaning he would have to be at two places at once. I know Arthur has many talents, but I do not believe duplicating into separate people is one of them.

For many centuries now, historians haven't been able to figure out whether King Arthur really existed or not. Many people have said he's just an old wives tales, but recent information is stating that he was real. According to The Independent, "the legendary British figure of the fifth and sixth century did exist but was a general rather than a monarch." Despite Arthur being a monarch was a myth, according to the source he did still fight in a copious amount of battles. Which makes sense given that a general would go into many battles rather than a king. Although theres still more to these new findings, the source that contrary to whats been said before, "he fought all his battles in southern Scotland and Northumberland and lived most of his

King Arthur is a mythical character in British history. Though his existence is frequently debated among historians, the story of King Arthur and "the sword in the stone" is an international story. However I find that the knowledge frequently held by the common populace tends to be contradictory to what is consistently found in the most reluctantly trusted sources. I'm here to correct that misinformation.

King Arthur of Camelot has been around for hundreds of years. Through storytelling and mythology, King Arthur has made his way into modern times and classrooms. The tales of his heroic acts have shaped modern literature and has been used by photographers, painters, and even filmmakers. One of the ongoing debates is whether he is a real person. There are arguments that suggest he is rather a mythical symbol, others suggest he was in fact a real person.

the hero's mother is a royal virgin, 2) his father is a king, 3) the father is often a near relative of his mothers, and 4) the circumstances of his birth are unusual. Later Arthur married princess Gwenhwyfer, and by the end he has lost his favor with his subjects of Avalon when he denounces their faith and traditions and makes Great Britain a Christian land only. Lastly his son does not succeed him, nor is his body buried. When looking at the characters in the story in a mythological approach, it would be easy to use a many number of approaches.

King Arthur was the hero of many legends and stories of the middle ages. According to legend, Merlin, the wizard, arranged for the birth of Arthur by bringing together King Uther Pendragon and Igrayne, Duchess of Cornwall. Igrayne was the wife of one of his barons, and Merlin's magic transforms Uther into the likeness of her husband, and Arthur is born of this union. This Arthur is associated with the magic and supernatural, while others are more closely related to myths. Raised in secrecy away from his father's court,

Although King Arthur is one of the most well-known figures in the world, his true identity remains a mystery. Attempts to identify the historical Arthur have been unsuccessful, since he is largely a product of fiction. Most historians, though, agree that the real Arthur was probably a battle leader of the Britons against the Anglo-Saxons in the sixthth century. In literature, King Arthur's character is unique and ever changing, taking on a different face in every work. There is never a clearly definitive picture that identifies Arthur's character. It is therefore necessary to look at a few different sources to get better insight into the character of Arthur, the once and future king.

The King Arthur legend is a Medieval tale that has been around for centuries. The magic, and the archetypes that are relatable to all has kept generations enraptured in the legend. Writers of these ever-changing legends are also known as “shapers,” because they have added elements from each of their writings that have created the legend we study and love to this very day. Examples of these shapers are, Geoffrey of Monmouth who wrote of a triumphant king who falls in battle. Another writer is Chretien de Troyes who introduced the Holy Grail into the legend. However, Sir Thomas Malory can be argued to be the most influential writer of the Arthurian Legend. Not only was Malory the first writer of the Arthurian Legend to write for english speakers,