preview

King Lear Research Paper

Decent Essays
Open Document

King Lear, The Absurdist In King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear wrestles with morality, mortality, and the ultimate meaning of life itself. King Lear attempts to finds meaning in loyalty, but when those who he perceived as loyal betray him, He is forced to face the total meaninglessness of the world. In the end King Lear is unable to embrace one of the three solutions to the absurd, and is killed by the grief he feels over his dead daughter cordelia. In the beginning of King Lear, king Lear hopes to divide his kingdom into three equal parts, each ruled by one of his daughters. King Lear decides that the best metric to determine whether or not his daughters deserve an inheritance, is to ask them how much they love him, and to gauge …show more content…

O! O! 'tis foul!
(iii.ii.14-24)
This is when king Lear realises that his daughters, and the world never owed him any loyalty, he was just living in a fool's paradise where he believed that they did. It is in this moment when King Lear begins to adopt the philosophy of Absurdism. Absurdism is a philosophy that states that there may be a meaning to the world, and it is human nature to seek that meaning, but because of the simple fact that they are humans, humans will never be able to determine that meaning. This search for meaning and finding none, are echoed in existentialism and nihilism. Lear’s folly came when he failed to accept one of the three solutions to the absurd. The three solutions to the absurd as defined by Albert Camus in his essay The myth of Sisyphus can be briefly summarized as: suicide, Faith in the unprovable or religion, and acceptance of the absurd. The Fool attempts to steer Lear to one of these solutions when he says:
O nuncle, court holy-water in a dry house is better than this rain-water out o' door.
Good nuncle, in, and ask thy daughters' blessing: here's a night pities neither wise man nor

Get Access