Kiryl Slizheuski. Student Number Here. Class Section Here.

Nowadays, as technology gradually integrates into our lives, more and more people start to consider a question: does technology really bring people advantages, or just more problems? Concerning this question, different authors including Kevin Kelly, Nicholas Carr, and Sherry Turkle convey their opinions.

Technology was massively growing in the years 2000-2010 causing a technological revolution. Many people were shocked by this advancement and were not as highly as acceptant. The article New workers, New workplaces Digital ‘Natives’ Invade the workplace written by Lee Rainie explains the growth and spread of technology and the effect it has on the younger generation in comparison with the older generation. Lee Rainie explains the consequences of this technology in the workplace. The intended audience for this text would be employers who want to learn more about technology and the effects of it on the younger generation. The purpose of this essay is to develop an understanding between the older generations who has not lived with technology alongside the younger generation who were raised by it. The context, organization and the tone of the essay all determine the effectiveness of the argument.

This report will examine how changes in technology are affected by society, in turn, how the society that produced this technology is impacted by this creation. The paper will specifically address the impact of personal computers, cell phones, and the internet on society, and how these technological advancements relate to the three major sociological perspectives; equilibrium model, digital divide, and cultural lag.

Technology is affecting the workforce all around the world. Joe McKendrick, an independent researcher, informs us of some different changes taking place through his article “5 Ways Digital Technology Is Changing Your Job.” McKendrick lets us know that technology could either bring forth a good change or a bad change within the workforce. Some of the changes mentioned within his article are the need for new skills, more occasions for entrepreneurial and innovation thinking, new job descriptions, get to know adjacent roles, etc (McKendrick). Technology is a driven tool around the world and could potentially change the workforce negatively or positively, whichever way you would like to look at it.

Using technology effectively can improve and at the same time be inconvenient in the work place. Stress level can rise in employees when the innovation of technology is introduced. Dedicated employees must learn new abilities. They are usually forced to gain skills involving their judgment, when and how to best use technology. Some can see technology as a positive improvement, others can over due the use and become workaholics since there is flexibility that applies and they can even work from home. Advanced and efficient service is a cause of stress in some employees. The internet has become an impact not just for business but also by individuals.

As the world grows more technologically advanced, it seems that the pressures of the day are increasing instead of decreasing. Instead of freeing up our time for enjoyment, we seem to cram more responsibilities into the time that has been freed up by technology. Technology has increased productivity, and increased productivity has required more from us.

Since the industrial revolution, society has become more and more dependent on technology. So much so that we sometimes lack the willingness to think before we act. We become impatient if it takes more than a few seconds to download a copy of the morning news paper. We expect immediate responses to our email, and we expect someone to answer their cell phone whenever and wherever we call. “Industrialization resulted in rapid and sustained economic growth and a massive increase in consumer goods. But at the same time, for many people it meant a thoroughly unpleasant work environment.”1

This analysis will discuss what issues an IT Department faces within the each company, as well as dive deeply into what productivity paradox is and whether companies under or over invest. This analysis will then close with a few methods on how to battle the ever-challenging productivity paradox.

Today’s workforce is filled with a plethora of new technology that was not exposed to the world before. A lot of these technological devices were seen with hopes to possibly make life easier for both personal and work life, which sounds great for employers (Palmiere). With so much technology around and with a generation of tech savvy people he question arises of whether or not people have become less productive in the workforce. With people checking their phone very often, and with so many social media mediums to check people are beginning to believe that our dependence on our devices is hurting companies due to our attention being on our devices. There is no longer a line drawn between work and home when most employees have brought their

concepts, hypothesis, etc...). The Discussion and Findings section expounds upon the relationship between theory and research, as well as, how research contributes to theory and how theory relates to concepts such as paradigm and model. Furthermore, the section contains information on how theory can be used to explore the effects that InfoSec technologies, policies, and procedures (IS-TPPs) have on individual productivity. The final two sections Recommendations and Conclusions briefly summarize recommendations from various researchers in the InfoSec field and draws conclusions as they relate to theory and the IS-TPPs research problem.

Around the late 80’s and early 90’s a change was occurring in businesses across the globe with the emergence of the desktop pc and the adoption of Information technology in the workplace as a standard. This created a void between business managers and those who were classed as technology managers. With the onset of recession businesses were forced to focus more on efficient use of resources and employee productivity. It was also identified at the time that many of these technology projects that were to vastly improve the business processes and increase the efficiency and productivity in the workplace was due to a disparate vision of technology managers who had no apparent

In today’s working world, there are almost no boundaries anymore between the technologies employees used for business and the ones used for pleasure. In fact, 64% of employees say they use the Internet for personal interest during working hours (Office Slacker Stats, 2015). Not to mention, advances in technology have helped employers utilize new forms of employee monitoring. Employee monitoring has emerged as a necessity to every workplace environment and yet it is still a very controversial issue due to the widespread use of technology. Lim (2002) mentions that,

“Today, following the quick changes experienced in technological gadgets, particularly in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), they convey accommodation to our lives also, take us under their control. These improvements give us a few open doors in business life, yet then again, they make a few weaknesses for employees “-Chesley, 2014; Nelson and Kletke, 1990. “Although the most recent advancements in business life decrease the bigger measure of weight caused by the troubles of physical undertakings, the expanded speed of work and less measure of time spent to get readied increment the weight of psycho-physical errands”- Bayazit Hayta, 2007. “The utilization of ICTs pushes individuals both to take after new applications and furthermore to acquire new technological devices and their adjustments”- Shah, Hassan and Embi, 2011.

To what extent are employee attitudes a contributing factor of new technology adoptions within organisations?

For one, ICT innovations, such as the intranet—an internet-enabled network within an organization, have proved crucial to many organizations in managing communications at different levels of the organization. Aside from the obvious use of the intranet in storing pertinent organizational data and information, the intranet also facilitates the development of a more participative, democratic organizational culture due to its emphasis on reducing information assymetry between managers and employees. Singh observes, for instance, that intranets are highly useful in the management of organizational knowledge and its human resources and has the potential to minimize the negative impact of bureaucracy within an organization since “it enables employees to interact more along the lines of work than along the lines of command” (497).