Knights Vs Samurai Essay

The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.

Imagine a knight, jousting in an arena in Europe during the Middle Ages. Surprisingly, across the world during approximately the same time period, samurai warriors fought in Japan. During the time period, 1000 to 1600 CE, the samurai and knights fought in battle in many different ways. Many differences between the samurai and knights included codes, armor, training, and religions. Without a doubt, the differences between the samurai and the knight overshadow the similarities.

Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty

Samurai and Knights are warriors fighting and serving for their lord. Samurai and knights are both trained, physically and mentally to fight for their lords, however while in a battle, strategies of both make it hard to distinguish who would win. While both warriors are very similar in many ways, Samurais differences such as their, training, weapons, and armor give them big advantages.

From researching about knights and samurai, I believe that in a battle between a knight and samurai, the knight would have a greater chance in winning. This is because knights focused more on fighting techniques and how to improve them, rather than focusing on spiritual beliefs and traditions as well, which is what the samurai did. The knights also had very strong and good armour which helped a lot in battles, while the samurai’s armour changed a lot but wasn’t ever as effective as the knight’s armour. The knight’s weapons were also more advanced and better then the samurai weapons.

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

Have you ever wondered who would win a battle between the European Knights and Japanese Samurai? Or how different or similar they were, they were very similar in some ways and different in many more. In my opinion, I believe these warriors were very much different they were different in 3 clear reasons! One, their views of death, two their codes of honor and three the way their armour looked like and how it was designed. The differences between the knights and samurai are greater than most realize.

There are many similarities between the samurai of medieval Japan and the knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training, armor, and code. For example, Document A and B discuss the samurai and knights start their training at an early age, they also had training that taught loyalty, and finally they both got raked up when they were fourteen years old, but the knights became squires and the samurai in training became samurai. However, the samurai read poetry in hidden places, and they practiced Kendo and Zen Buddhism. According to Document A “The young warriors studied Kendo, the moral code of the samurai, and Zen Buddhism.” The knights learned horse skills when they were younger and how to ride a horse and pony at a young

A thousand years ago, a class of professional warriors arose. Who swore their oath of loyalty to the noble lords. In which, the Daimyos fought to death to defend their land. This lead to Japan developing a group of warriors called samurai. In Europe, they also developed a group of warriors and these warriors were called knights. There were some similarities between a knight and samurai. For one, they both had a social pyramid. Another reason would be because of their armour and warfare. The last similarity that they had would be their code of honor. The similarities between a knight and samurai were greater than the differences because of their social positions, armour, code of honor, and warfare.

Samurais and knights are different in many ways, but they are also very similar in some ways as well. First of all, training. Samurais and knights both start training during childhood, and they both used artificial swords. The samurai, however train differently in some ways by learning poetry and Kendo as well! At the age of 14, the training samurais would officially become a samurai in a ceremony called Genpuku. Knights would usually become a squire at the age of 14 with all the knowledge on how to ride a horse. Both samurai and knights showed loyalty to their master. According to Document A, it says,”School was a unique combination of physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline.” You can see that the samurai training was alike in many ways but also different in ways compared to the knight training.

The samurai the warrior for Japan, they were determined to defend their ruler no matter what the cost is for example torture, Death or imprisonment. The knight was the warrior for Europe. They kept order in Europe when there was none. Even though samurai and knights have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their armor, training and beliefs.

In Japan and Europe, Samurai and Knights became respected warriors who they hired for protection for their many lands. You might wonder, where the more similar or different? Although they had

Surprisingly, almost 1000 years ago people in two societies halfway across the world both created a system that historians call feudalism. These two societies were Japan and Europe. From approximately 1000 to 1600 AD Japan and Europe both had a class of professional warriors; Japan had samurai and Europe, knights. Both societies had codes that they had to follow: Japan used bushido, and Europe had chivalry. Their training was rigorous, and their armor was protective. Without a doubt, the evidence supports that the similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences, especially in the codes, armor, training, and feudal systems.

The clash of swords and the screams of the dying fill the air. It the middle ages there were two elite class of warriors who were very similar, despite being on opposite sides of the world. These warriors were the knights and the samurai. From approximately 1000 to 1600 A.D. Knights and samurai were the profits of feudalism a system where they had serfs work their fields for them.

Knights and samurai are known for being excellent fighters. In addition to being good fighters, they also have to follow a code that tells them how to behave. For the knights, the code is European chivalry. For the samurais, the code is Japanese bushido. Either way, both were respected groups of people that protected their homeland. Some of their morals would fit nicely into society today.