Knowledge Management Essay

To organize and prioritize the current and future projects in the pipeline in a way that fits into the PMB budget of $5B, and ensures projects that increase sales, growth, and stockholder value are of top priority, whereas projects that are not beneficial are either put on hold or discarded.

There is no denying the incredible library of knowledge the internet has made readily available for all to use. Having such a resource is transforming modern society in many ways, as it brings insight and news across the world at a moment’s notice, all the while enhancing educational and technological advancements. However, according to Sven Birkets, an American essayist and literacy critic, in his essay, “The Owl Has Flown”, it is not without fault as observations are to be made on how this new resource has transformed people’s intelligence and wisdom. The author theorizes that the large, almost unlimited, library that is now being offered by services such as the internet, reshapes the public’s knowledge. Knowledge is transformed to be horizontal or insubstantial compared to the much deeper lateral understanding pertaining to older generations because of the amount of time they spent dwelling on a much smaller set of resources. This observation made by Birkets in the late 90’s is expanded upon, and modernized by Nicholas Carr, an American writer and author, in a more inflicting and self-reflecting article for The Atlantic magazine entitled “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet is doing to our brains”. Carr does not just blame the Google search engine in this claim, but the internet as a whole on how it impacts concentration and our ability to contemplate. These cognitive impacts are observed and explained in more scientific terms by Eric Jaffe, a regular Observer

Technology, especially the Internet, makes humans’ life easier and more effective. A quick access to information brings people a huge opportunity to explore the world and develop them. However, Nicolas Carr, in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” argues that technology affects people’s life, it changes their mind and actions, and humans start to lose abilities of “deep thinking and deep reading”, which are essential skills of being humans. In other words, our world becomes more simplified that people are unable to be smart and creative as they were in the past. For him, today’s people think and act in the frame of programmed world of the Net. Moreover, although Carr worries that the Net based corporations, such as Google, are seeking to replace human’s

There has been debate on how the growth of technological inventions is influencing the way humans think. For teenagers and young adults in my generation, it’s rather easy to adapt to new advancements since we grew up being introduced to so many inventions that took over the entire world’s interest in the past decade. I personally prefer to multitask than to focus on one task at hand and I can record more information in a less amount of time when I type on a keyboard. Therefore, I have an easier time learning and getting things done with techy tools than when I sit upright with just a pen and paper. But most skeptics that assume technology is a disease would argue that technology’s versatility and convenience could be a distracting to our thought process. In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” author Nicholas Carr believes that the progress in technological innovation has had a derailing effect on our cognition; however, in the article, “Smarter Than You Think,“ Clive Thompson addresses how collaborating with today’s technological advances can actually give more opportunities to bring about more intelligence. Although Carr addresses how technology can be a major challenge to our critical thinking skills, Thompson arguably provides better evidence to show how technology actually challenges our skills to for the better by teaching us how to be more aware, giving us the opportunity to access the most amount of information, and creating a higher field of expertise for the

Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” questions the motif of technology and if it is making us smarter or if it has made us so dependent on technology and its facility to do things that we are losing our own ability. Carr asserts “my mind expects to take in information the way the net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles… The more they use the web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing,” to emphasize the detriments technology has created and its constant environment of perpetual interference. Though because of technology, and the internet, people have become more efficient and are able to attain information faster. Carr concludes that some people tend to forget is that information is not knowledge, that knowledge is the transfer for short memory to long term memory, and the problem is that people tend to take in too much too fast, and overload the short term memory with constant new information and push out other short term memory to make room. But

Ever since the beginning of the human race, people have been innovating and inventing, finding new and better ways to do old things. Today, the proudest achievement of human ingenuity is the internet. With it, all of humanity is connected, to both each other, and all the information they could ever need about anything. Most are welcoming this new wave of available information, especially as it becomes easier to navigate with the help of growing search engines such as Google. However, some are starting to recognize cons to the new system in place, claiming that instantly available information is detrimental to human thought.

As the internet rapidly expands and becomes ingrained in almost all aspects of life, it must be asked—is the internet making society more or less intelligent? There are two different methods of determining smartness: measuring fluid intelligence and measuring crystallized intelligence. Fluid intelligence is the ability to gain and process information. Fluid intelligence is similar to a computer’s RAM, in that “the more you have, the faster and more effortlessly you can multi-task, and the higher the quantity and complexity of stuff you can handle”. Crystallized intelligence can also be described as prior knowledge; intelligence gained from experience. Using the computer analogy, crystallized intelligence would be similar to a computer’s hard drive, in that it relies not on the amount of information processed, but on the ability to recall a certain piece and use it. The technological advance of the internet has made society smarter by increasing learning and problem solving skills.

The advent of technology transforms our vision of things, our way of life, learn to think on a daily basis. Is google making us stupid? That is the question posed by Nicholas Carr. This may lead us to the question of the influence of the internet and other systems on our daily habits; it appears that those can also affect our way of thinking critically.

The superior capabilities of knowledge management systems provide an opportunity for the business to engage the most effective components and recognize the importance of communication to make informed, accurate decisions (McGrath, 2001). This system can organize the company’s knowledge resources, knowledge obtaining, organizing, and applying to make a sound routine the will enforce effectiveness (Niu, 2008). The dynamic function of knowledge management to create, capture, and apply knowledge to achieve an organization’s objective will allow them to be more profitable and successful (Zucker, 1986). In addition to increasing profits, the system can be also used to reduce costs and enhance research and development (DeTienne & Jackson, 2001). With all of these advantages, it would be wasteful for a company to not employ knowledge management. As seen in the Discovery Communications, Inc. example, the company can attribute their new productivity levels and increase in ease of securing documents to the knowledge management system that put into place by Carefree Technology. Like Discovery Communications, Inc., knowledge management is so popular today because companies can collect, process and share knowledge to ignite employees ' creativity which in turn will make the business grow. Wenhong and Jianhua (2009) explained the core of knowledge management is to convert company’s knowledge resources into an increased company

Tracy Packiam Alloway, a psychology professor at the University of North Florida, presents an argument as to why she believes technology is not making us lazy, but is actually making us more efficient. Alloway speaks of a study she did on several hundred people where she analyzed how technology has altered the way those people “remember and process” information (Alloway 1). After a series of questions, Alloway identified which people were active users of technology and which ones were passive users. She determined technology does indeed have a significant effect on the operation of our brains; however, it is not a negative one. The study showed active users of technology were much better at focusing on multiple pieces of information at once, easily adapting to any sort of change in the information, while passive users “processed information successively and found it easier to focus on a single target at a time” (Alloway 1). Therefore, Alloway determined technology does the opposite of limiting our progress, for it gives a better opportunity to multitask. She argues new developments, such as Google, simply provided quicker access to new information, rather than wasting hours trying to find the information. Although, Alloway does admit we will still always need to know how to use the information. Knowing the information is simply not enough, so despite the emergence of technology, we will still have to know how to achieve certain tasks ourselves. In her concluding statements, Alloway says, “Instead of having to fill up our mental ‘space’ with lots of information, this space is now freed up to focus on other things” (Alloway 1). In short, Alloway believes technology does not diminish our level of efficiency but enhances

Knowledge can refer to a theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. It can be tacit (as with practical skill or expertise) or explicit (as with the theoretical understanding of a subject); it can be more or less formal or systematic. Botha et al (2008) pointed out that tacit and explicit knowledge should be seen as a spectrum rather than as definitive points. Therefore, in practice, all knowledge is a mixture of tacit and explicit elements rather than being one or the other. The most important distinction within KM is between explicit and tacit knowledge. The overload of data is making knowledge management increasingly more important as it facilitates decision-making capabilities; builds learning organizations by making learning routine, and stimulates cultural change and innovation.

Knowledge management is defined by Sallis and Jones (2002), as “a systemic method for managing individual, group and organisational knowledge using the appropriate means and technology”. In short, it involves various fields of expertise in achieving organisational objectives by making the best use of knowledge at the same time.

“As we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence.” (Carr, N. 2013). These words that depict Kubrick’s dark prophecy in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey opens the mind of the viewer on the strong impact that technology has on the human brain. Nicholas Carr, the author of the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet Is Doing To Our Brains,” agrees with Kubrick in that although technology is efficient, it may not always be the most effective when it comes to creating overall well-rounded thinking. I agree with Carr on this issue and I have noticed that technology alters the way one thinks, has caused society to become reliant upon

To many the introduction of technology, especially the Internet, has brought the world to them with a simple touch of a button. However, it is possible that technology has not truly opened its users to the world, but only to a more condensed, highly self-motivated version of it. Though technology was initially created to better develop and broaden the minds of its users, there is a possibility that it has inadvertently intellectually stunted the minds of our generation.

Hewlett Packard (HP) is a leading multinational organization providing products and services in many IT related technologies such as computer hardware and software, printers, scanners, storage devices etc. In 1995, the company decided to introduce knowledge management in its organization that will make its systems, processes, outcomes superior with organized and systematic knowledge handling and storage. HP faces severe competition and thus has to be ahead of the market using many strategies, one of which is application of Knowledge Management (KM). With over 600 business units located