Knowledge is Information, Understanding, and Experience

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world” (Mandela). In discussions of education, Newman argues that there should be a common shared knowledge between people. According to statistics, there are 70% of Americans who do not hold a college degree. Newman’s ideas revolve around the belief that everyone should go to college and pursue a higher education. If Newman’s ideas are implemented in today’s society, there will not only be short term difficulties like a greater demand for teachers and supplies but also long term difficulties with America’s economy. Although Newman’s system sounds like it would create a better world in the surface, it would be one which is hard to apply in today’s American society.

Knowledge is something that we know that you have facts to back up to form your argument and is justified. Knowledge isn’t something that can be created overnight but something that we form over the course of life. I feel that being raised by my grandmother I gained a lot of knowledge and wisdom because she has years and experience over me and wouldn’t tell me anything to hurt me but to help me in life. We all learn from mistakes but with mistakes gain wisdom then knowledge. We don’t gain knowledge overnight but with growth we become more aware of our worldview.

A belief is defines a true statement, something that exists, or the trust and faith in someone or something. We all have beliefs and have obtained those believes individually in many different ways and whose to say that belief is right or wrong, or true or false. As with a myth, a traditional story, mostly believed to be a false idea or false believe.

The main argument here is that the knowledge represents for me the basis of my values, from which I learned most things, which in return guided me to the other good values like the honesty, responsibility and accountability. I highly believe that the knowledge is the major source of all other good

Knowledge is the beginning of wisdom. Knowledge is a gift from God. Knowledge is God, God is a someone, not a something. Full knowledge concerning God can’t be explained.

Edmund Gettier’s argument that justified true belief is not a sufficient definition for knowledge is correct. There are many scenarios in which the conditions for justified true belief are met but cannot be said to qualify as knowledge; therefore justified true belief is not a sufficient definition for knowledge.

However, questioning how we can know sensible objects involves complex questioning. Can anyone know a true object? This leads to issues of elitism.

Knowledge is based on what is, or truths. The only established truths are the forms. The forms represent true, eternal, unchanging, or facts. Knowledge stems from the idea of forms. One who has knowledge must understand the forms. Only a

One consistency in both texts of the Meno (Meno 99c) and Republic (Republic 472d) is that people who use true belief cannot show or explain how their belief is the truth. I believe this is one of the largest distinctions between knowledge and true belief. Knowledge is

Knowledge is defined as facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education. It is the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. Each one of us knows lots of things. However, it seems that some people know things that are the opposite from what other people seem know. For example, some know that we come from evolution and others know that we were created by god. Therefore, knowing something doesn't make it true; it only means that we consider it to be true. If that is the case then what is absolute truth? The word true is defined as in accordance with fact or reality/ accurate or exact. Therefore, there either is absolute truth, something that is true at all times and places, or there is not. However,

Plato's definition makes sense as some ideas are not always going to end up being justified rather held together with belief. What I mean by that is some ideas such as the idea of "space-life" is something I believe in but not yet justified. Somethings are better left with belief even if justification follows later. On the other side, the reverse is also true because we are humans and what makes us different is the fact that our brains do not share the exact same ideals. Some may believe that there are other planets like earth out there but others may not even though it's scientifically proven correct. In conclusion, Plato's "justified, true belief" is very unique but stands true even when reversed as justification and belief often times go

The Truth Is an Illusion and the Illusion is a Truth “Faith is a knowledge within the heart, beyond the reach of proof.” Khalil Gibran. Since long time ago, people believe in a certain doctrine that distinguish them from others. Practicing specific rituals aiming to achieve the salvation and get rid of the passion of the mundane. Consequently, many beliefs and religions appeared in all parts of the ground.

Truth can be defined as conformity to reality or actuality and in order for something to be “true” it must be public, eternal, and independent. If the “truth” does not follow these guidelines then it cannot be “true.” Obviously in contrary anything that goes against the boundaries of “truth” is inevitably false. True and false, in many cases does not seem to be a simple black and white situation, there could sometimes be no grounds to decide what is true and what is false. All truths are a matter of opinion. Truth is relative to culture, historical era, language, and society. All the truths that we know are subjective truths (i.e. mind-dependent truths) and there is nothing more to truth than what we are willing to assert as true

or that death is not the end. There is no way to prove that this is

A very old and extremely natural account is that belief, truth, and justification are individually and jointly necessary and jointly sufficient for knowledge; this account is known as justified-truth-belief (JTB) analysis of knowledge. This means that ‘S knows that p’ if and only if (a) ‘S beliefs that p’, (b) ‘p is true’, and ‘S is justified in believing that p’.