Kraft & Cadbury Merger Just 27 months ago Kraft and Cadbury, two of the most exclusive firms in the snack production industry consummated the final merger decision after negotiating for several months. This essay lays out why this merger came to fruition and the reasons it made strategic sense financially. Also, I evaluate numbers from the acquisition, as well and performance over the past couple of years. One of the main aspects to analyze are the financial statements after the merger as well as accounting methodology. Synopsis of Kraft and Cadbury Kraft Foods Inc., also known as KFT, is the highest volume food processing company in the world. In the year 2009, KFT posted over 40 billion dollars in generated revenue. They also sell products in over 160 countries worldwide. Some of their most popular brands include Philly Cream Cheese, Maxwell House Coffees and flavorings, Nabisco, and their mayonnaise, likely the most recognized. Many types of cheeses, packages and frozen meals, breads and candies are all under the Kraft Foods, Inc umbrella. This makes them a very hot commodity for investors, as juggernauts such as Warren Buffett owns about 9.4% of Kraft stock. They are a global phenomenon with over 110,000 employees across the world and large market capitalization. Four years ago, KFT replace AIG after they collapsed as part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Ratna, Bhushan, 2010) Cadbury is a British based confection
According to the researchers the increased value results from an opportunity to utilize a specialized resources which arises solely as a result of the merger (Jensens & Ruback, 1983; Bradle, Desai and Kim , 1983). For creating operational and financial synergies managers believe that two enterprises will be worth more if merged than if operates as two separate entities. Thus, the two companies, A and B:
This had increased sales within the introduction thus having a high growth market and high market share straight away with sales of 40 million within the first week. The reason for his is due to the huge marketing campaign that Cadburys had set up which led to a global rollout of the product on the September 24 1996 called “Fuse day”.
For the corporation that has acquired another company, merged with another company, or been acquired by another company, evaluate the strategy that led to the merger or acquisition to determine whether or not this merger or acquisition was a wise choice. Justify your opinion.
Cadbury is a British multinational confectionery company wholly owned by Mondelez International since 2010. It is the second-largest confectionery brand in the world after Wrigley's. Cadbury is internationally headquartered in Uxbridge, West London, and operates in more than 50 countries worldwide. It is famous for its Dairy Milk chocolate, the Creme Egg and Roses selection box, and many other confectionery products. Cadbury was established in Birmingham, England in 1824, by John Cadbury who sold tea, coffee and drinking chocolate. Cadbury developed the business with his brother Benjamin, followed by his sons Richard and George. George developed the Bournville estate, a model village designed to give the company's workers improved living conditions. Dairy Milk chocolate, introduced in 1905, used a higher proportion of milk within the recipe compared with rival products. By 1914, the chocolate was the company's best-selling product. Cadbury, alongside Rowntree's and Fry, were the big three British confectionery manufacturers throughout much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
In this chapter, we first provide coverage of expansion through corporate takeovers and an overview of the consolidation process. Then we present the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations followed by limited coverage of the purchase method and pooling of interests provided in a separate sections.
2. Kraft’s marketing strategy will benefit significantly from buying Cadbury in two different ways. Firstly, when we look at the brand portfolio of Kraft, which is the world’s second biggest food company. It is clear that there are plenty of old-timer cash cows, such as cheese, Nabisco and Suchard, but there are only very few rising stars. According to the Boston Matrix, cash cow means a product with a high share of a slow growth market, which can generate a stable
Kraft Foods established in 1903 has been in existence for over a century and is a household name. It's a company that when spoken of a thought of Mac-n-Cheese or dairy products come to mind but it is so much more. This organization has progressed dramatically over the years buying over other companies, improving existing brands, and introducing new product lines. Today, Kraft Food products include beverages, cheese, dairy, and snack foods. How has Kraft been able to thrive? Is it because they are striving to ensure that their Mission, Vision, and Values are easily understood and achievable?
Mergers and acquisitions have become a growing trend for companies to inorganically grow a business within its particular industry. There are many goals that companies may be looking to achieve by doing this, but the main reason is to guarantee long-term and profitable growth for their business. Companies have to keep up with a rapidly increasing global market and increased competition. With the struggle for competitive advantage becoming stronger and stronger, it is almost essential to achieve these mergers. Through research I will attempt to dissect the best practices for achieving merger success.
A merger is a partial or total combination of two separate business firms and forming of a new one. There are predominantly two kinds of mergers: partial and complete. Partial merger usually involves the combination of joint ventures and inter-corporate stock purchases. Complete mergers are results in blending of identities and the creation of a single succeeding firm. (Hicks, 2012, p 491). Mergers in the healthcare sector, particularly horizontal hospital mergers wherein two or more hospitals merge into a single corporation, are increasing both in frequency and importance. (Gaughan, 2002). This paper is an attempt to study the impact of the merger of two competing healthcare organization and will also attempt to propose appropriate
* For the corporation that has acquired another company, merged with another company, or been acquired by another company, evaluate the strategy that led to the merger or acquisition to determine whether or not this merger or acquisition was a wise choice. Justify your opinion.
Question 1 Several factors have been proposed as providing a rationale for mergers. Among the more prominent ones are (1) tax considerations, (2) diversification, (3)
When companies combine/merge the whole objective is to gain new opportunities, gain market share, grow the business, to become more innovative and to improve product offerings, utilizing/sharing the existing resources and data. From the case
Poor Program Management: Programs instituted as a result of the merger need to be detailed and managed properly so that everyone involved in the merger knows what to do and what to expect (Siegenthaler, 2010). Improperly managing these programs can cause delays, and ultimately, cost the company money.
Industry Analysis: Cadbury Schweppes (CS) is comprised of a global confectionery and beverage company. For the purpose of this case we will maintain our focus on the confectionery business and the assessment of adding to their sugar confectionery portfolio. CS is number three in the beverage business but see the opportunity to become the largest confectionery in the world. The categories are chocolates, sugar and chewing gum. At this time Adams is the number two sized in the gum business. This industry operates on “bigger is better in confectionery”. Their strategic discussions and ambitions appear to stay true, in mentality, to this mantra. This mantra could be potentially dangerous to the business. CS had a presence in over 70
worth $32,8 billion, which is more than CBS. The market has several segments of the its