preview

Krenek

Decent Essays

Ernst Krenek first identifies music as a separate, young art. He compares music to both artistic skills and written texts, citing the newness of both age and tradition. Krenek is definitely well aware of his general audience. By assuming that the reader will not have a musical knowledge basis, he directly takes himself out of a musical context in order to make the history more understandable. While this is affective, it also causes the reader (being me) to question what evidence I can find in Ockeghem’s music to support Krenek’s assertions. Krenek identifies that many composers are solely responsible for creating ‘something new’ that allows contemporary composers to make more pathways. Although he does not specifically state this, the implication …show more content…

Shaped by literature of Glareanus, many more modern composers read the short description of Ockeghem and sought to study his work – albeit a wrongly attributed work. The brief description of Ockeghem’s life is sorely lacking. Krenek admits to not having much hard evidence for both dates and place, allowing that there is room for a margin of error in what we accept as Ockeghem’s life. During his life time, while he worked in Tours, France gained considerable global standing. Given that consolidation of both state and international affairs were held in Tours during Ockeghem’s life, it causes the reader to question how living in a political stronghold may have affected his work. This is definitely not relevant to his work, but it is an interesting avenue of thought. Both the rise of art and architecture in a gothic, gaudy style were a part of his everyday life. This influence could have provided inspiration for his musical aesthetic. Comparing Ockeghem’s music to the polyphonic tradition of the Gregorian chant provides a starting point – where does his music

Get Access