Case Study 1:- Krispy Kreme Doughnuts inc Maytham Hussein Saeed Question 1 Is Krispy Kreme financially “healthy”? What do the statement show, what do the ratio show? Answer Based on the Common Sized Financial Statement of Limited Service Restaurant Averages and Krispy Kreme (KKD) the value of KKD’s cash and equivalents is 3.1 and its lower that the 3 years industry average’s value of 12.8 in 2001, 12.4 in 2002 and 13.7 in which is not a good sign because it show company has low cash in their hand compared to industry benchmark. This is due to the low in sale especially cash sale that will lead to low cash collected from their sale. Although their cash turnover (CTO) that increase back to …show more content…
Compared to their major competitor, current ratio and quick ratio of KKD is the highest among all of them which show that their ability to meet their short term liabilities is the highest among all of them even though KKD too much depend on their trade receivable and other current assets. This will give a good sign to their supplier to give them more short term debt facilities in the future because KKD have high ability to meet it and financially in healthy position in managing their current assets, Based on non current assets of KKD stated in common sized financial statement, it show that intangible assets in 2003 (26.6) is higher that 3 years industry average ( 2001:13.3, 2002:14.2, 2003:12.6) but fixed assets (42.5) and other non current assets (4.5) in 2003 is lower that the industry average (fixed assets (2001:54.7, 2002:57, 2003:55) and other non current assets (2001:11.0, 2002:9.6, 2003:10.0) ). This leads to lower value of total non current assets of KKD for 2003 (73.6) compared to the 3 years industry average (79.0 in 2001, 81.8 in 2002 and 77.6 in 2003). This also lead to the continuity of downward movement in certain ratio that related to total assets which is total assets turnover (TATO) that decrease from 2.1 in FY Jan 2000 till 1.2 in FY Feb 2003 then continue to drop to 1.01 and compared to their competitor KKD is the third lowest among them all. This show that KKD is losing their
3-17. How many times has the company been sold? When and by whom to whom?
Since there are significant changes in the company for the last 3 years such as descending trend in car and truck market in 1991, sale of one of their core electronics business, terminated Volvo agreement etc.; the company thinks that their financial value (equity and debt ratios and weights) and accordingly cost of capital is changed. Also company has free cash (derived from the sales of electronics
When looking at the 2004 DuPont analysis, you see that not only has profit margin increased every year, but it is more than 2% better than the industry average. That being said, Krispy Kreme does not utilize its assets as efficiently as its competitors. This potentially troubling because of the fact that they have gone through aggressive growth in stores recently. Is this an indication that these stores are not generating the sales necessary to justify the investment, or at least as well as its competitors might be able to? Finally the equity multiplier comes in below the industry average. To us this means that Krispy Kreme does not utilize its leverage as effectively as the competition. Perhaps it would be to Krispy Kreme’s benefit to increase leverage and invest in order to increase growth and earnings in a similar manner to its competition. Overall, we believe that Krispy Kreme is moderately
Net income is total revenues minus total expenses incurred to generate those revenues all within the same reporting period. Net income is calculated by the accrual accounting methodology meaning that the expenses incurred to generate revenues are reported at the same time the related revenues are reported. Both revenue recognition and expenses paid may not coincide with actual cash transactions. Net cash from operating activities, on the other hand, is not determined by accrual but by
The third ratio is the CFO/CL ratio (short-term debt coverage), which shows what part of the company’s short-term liabilities can be payed by its most liquid asset – cash. GSK’s average meaning of the CFO/CL was 0,64 This is a good showing, because it proves that GSK uses its cash effectively, since if the company’s cash ratio equals 1 it means that company has too much cash in reserves During years 2005-2007 the CFO/CL ratio changed very slightly, but in 2008 ratio increased to 0,72, probably because GSK has faced increase in derivative financial instruments, inventories and receivables, which happened due to the strengthening of overseas currencies In
Asset turnover ratio is also increasing in 1994. It shows that total assets are being efficiently used in producing revenues.
Chhapon Mina Song (PR and Marketing Officer) is a PR major with a management minor at Utica College. She is knowledgeable about intercultural communications. She understands well about different expectations of customers from different cultures. With this knowledge, Song will be able to build the relationship between our franchising restaurant with the public bringing good image to our business. She is also passionate about public services and community work. She has helped organizing several fundraising events at her previous
The company’s financial performance looks quite good at the end of Feb 1, 2004. From the exhibit 1, income statement, we can see that Krispy Kreme was growing from the year ended Jan 30, 2000 to the year ended Feb 1, 2004. Total revenue increased significantly 202% from US$ 220,243 thousands in Jan 30, 2000 to US$ 665,592 thousands in Feb 1, 2004. Net income increased 858% from US$ 5,956 in Jan 30, 2000 to US$ 57,087 thousands in Feb 1, 2004. The balance sheet in exhibit 2, looks as good as the income statement in
KRISPY KREME, one of the successful companies in the food-service industry, began as a single doughnut shop in the early 20ths. The rapid expansion of its business scale made the corporation suffer its first economic crisis by the early 1980s. A group of franchisees later took charge of the heavily-debt company bringing new management ideas which helped the KRISPY KREME find way back to the game and become the role model in the industry. KK generated revenues through four primary sources: on-premises retail sales, off-premises sales, product mix and
From Exhibits 7 & 8, quick and current ratios grew steadily over the years reflecting ability for KKD to repay their short-term debt. These ratios when compared to their competitors were above the average. The leverage ratios were lower than most of the other companies showing that KKD did not have enough invested in long term debt.
Overall, we can say that Krispy Kreme has still a strong position in the market. Although it is a smaller company with less financial backing, it remains competitive as its breadth of products appeals across all major demographic groups (including age and income). Its doughnuts have also stirred a cult-like following. Yet its recent problems in strategies (over expansion, unethical accounting procedures) and management could
From the 2001 projections, the company`s sales revenues reached the 90.9 million mark in 2001 representing a 15 million rupees growth over the previous year. Despite this remarkable increase, there are a number of financial challenges that must be taken into account when evaluating the forecast. For example, based on the company`s total assets turnover which tells how efficient the company is using its assets to generate sales, Kota`s total assets turnover ratio is suboptimal. In 2000, the
Health care organisations do business on cash basis. They provide proper medical services to different people and they receive cash when operation ends and they don’t use any debt to finance their operating activities. The capital structure of this firm shows a zero inventory turnover and a huge amount of cash from the customers from which partially is used to pay current liabilities and the remaining is in the form of retain earning.
As Heineken Malaysia Berhad current ratio is 1.88:1, it actually have been exceed the ideal ratio for a company which is 1.5:1. This has shown that Heineken Malaysia Berhad have the ability to meet its short term liabilities. Other than that, as in 2014, the current ratio for Heineken Malaysia Berhad is 1.42:1, this has shown that they are operating their business well in general as in 2015, the current ratio has an improved from 1.42:1 to 1.88:1. Actually, the receivables, deposits and prepayment from current assets in 2014 is higher than the receivables, deposits and prepayment in 2015. This is because the amount due from a subsidiary in the receivable, deposits and prepayment section have a significant different between 2014 and 2015 for both trade and non-trade. The trade amount due from a subsidiary for 2014 is RM24,945,000 but in 2015, there is a zero trade amount due from a subsidiary for the year. Moreover, the non-trade amount due from a subsidiary also have a significant different of RM41,313,000 which because of amount in 2014 is 76,865,000 and the amount in 2015 is 35,552,000. Although, this can actually become a problem which can drag
People love to drink coffee. Coffee shops, independently owned or chains are every corner. Statistics show that people are taking more coffee every day. It is a very profitable business.