LW & R Grading

The QUALITY of your reports/summaries is very important, your ability to summarize important points will be taken in account when grading

Please note that this Assessment document has 7 pages and is made up of 3 Sections.

Kurt Wiesenfeld's article, "Making the Grade," presents the social issue of grades. The author explores the extent of this problem by examining the social environment in which these students were raised. Wiesenfeld also addresses the changing attitude towards what a grade represents and the true value of a grade. The author effectively uses several writing strategies to engage the reader, influence the audience and illustrate how much thought he has given this issue. The essay is organized by a logical progression from thesis to individual claims and the author provides real-world examples for the issues. With those real-world examples, Wiesenfeld explains how serious the problem can become and demonstrates why the issue should be addressed.

In LE 101 otherwise known as the Introduction to Legal Systems “students are introduced to the American system of law and legal structure, and gain an overview of several areas of law. Topics include basic legal, concepts, the structure of the American court system, as well as legal theory and procedure” (Quinnipiac Course Catalog). Although I am not planning on going into any legal field it is important to have a general understanding of how our legal system functions and how it maintains social structure in our society. This course is very different from most of my classes as the focus is on reading the law and past cases and interpreting the significance and the impact that these cases have had on our societal development. By taking this

First off, the grade of a student does not show what they know. In no way is grading a paper the same as assessing knowledge. Furthermore, if

Student grades in each course are based, in part, on test, homework, and project scores, but they are also strongly influenced by class participation, individual student initiative, punctuality, attendance, and class preparedness. It is the student’s responsibility to be fully aware of the course requirements and grading system described in each teacher’s class policy or course outline.

One tip to grade written responses quickly is sharing the workload (Brookhart, 1999). One summer, I teamed with a colleague to teach a course. During that semester, we shared the grading responsibilities. Once we realized how we could get grading done quicker together, we started sharing the grading for other courses throughout the year. However, we do have to be careful in maintaining fair grading. Although our exam items are problem-solving items with one final answer, this is where the guideline of detailed solutions with partial credit indicated for problem-solving items (Morrison, Ross, Kalman, & Kemp, 2013) will be helpful in the future.

Teachers have always used grades to measure the amount a student has learned. This practice is becoming ineffective. Many students have a wide range of grades, which show that grades may not show what a student really knows. Therefore, the standard grading system should be replaced. Some reasons why grades should be replaced are bad grades can hinder a child’s performance, grades define who a student is in the classroom, and grades are not an effective way to see if students have learned the material. The current grading system should be upgraded and every school should incorporate the plus/minus system in their method of grading.

With any type of grading system, there will be controversy over the accuracy and fairness of the system. The belief of using the standard deviations of the class to rate the grades seems to be an accurate

2). Ineffective grading policies can result in wide variations in grades across a school or even within a single teacher’s classroom. There has been a great deal of debate as to what constitutes fair and ethical grading practices. Supporters of the recent trend toward standards based grading argue that items such as organization skills or timeliness do not assess whether or not a student knows a standard. O’Connor and Wormeli (2011) argue that “these reports offer no precise documentation and render description feedback impossible” (p. 40). Furthermore, Randall and Engelhard (2010) reported that in “some borderline cases [of student failure] teachers report considering non-achievement factors” (p. 1) to improve a student’s final grade. Conversely, other educators argue that the exclusion of some subjective topics such as effort, attitude, or participation do not give a clear picture of the whole child’s actual school achievement (Stitt & Pula, 2014). Stitt and Pula (2014) suggest that students who suffer from text anxiety tend to score lower and may appear as low achievers when in fact the same student may be among the most motivated in the

Ashley Lamb-Sinclair discusses the disadvantages of the American grading system in her article “Why Grades Are Not Paramount to Achievement.” I agree that the grading system has plenty of faults and is a broken system. I understand that it can represent improvements and record work in an organized matter, however, I believe the system is unjust in countless different ways, it presents a single one letter grade for the entire half of the entire school year, completely disregarding the time and effort that went into every single project and assignment. Occasionally, I will hardly put in any effort into something and still obtain a promising grade, which is unfair since the assignment is left neglected and the topic is still confusing. The other

Answer: Integrity property as only an authorized faculty has the right to make changes to the course grade.

Due Dates and Late Papers: Late papers will lose half a letter grade per class until they’re turned in (more than two weeks late will result in an F). At the end of each progression, please put all exercises and drafts in a folder with your final essay on top, and turn the whole thing in portfolio-style.

On one hand, the traditional grading system is universally recognized; its simplistic nature allows teachers, students, and parents to easily interpret, understand, and directly compare others in the same class. But on the other hand, there also significant cons, such as its subjectivity, lack of explanation, and cultivation of testing culture. This is exactly what non-letter grading is intended to

Grades for mis-behaving/ mucking up students etc are excellent to show them they need to work harder.