La Metro Rail Case Study

The United State has always been weak in public transportation and mass transit tools. California was once supposed to be different and revolutionized. Trolleys connecting the suburbs to the city and business districts was the main reason why cities expanded vertically. These mass transit tools organized the transits in an extremely environmentally friendly way. But the venue of cars and the thought of independence flattered americans pushing them to each buy a car, synonym of their independence. Now the trains and connecting public transportations have practically disappeared and are irrelevant.

The author of this article wrote that it is important for the citizens of Detroit to vote for a public rail and bus transit system. Puentes states that there are a myriad amount of jobs but there is also no way to get to them. Although there are many buses, trains and routes in Detroit, there are no connecting routes from one region to another or to the city itself. This makes it harder for people to get to their jobs in less than an hour. Something else the author mentions is that most of the families in Detroit receive low income, so they cannot pay for all the buses needed in order to go to work.

The chorus "nobody walking in LA" does ring true. With the blocks being longer as Capote states in his essay, it makes walking more of a hassle in L.A. I don't believe our public transportation is as good as it used to be. As any city, L.A. is packed with not only the residents but tourist as well. As a community I believe driving has become the cultural norm for those who live in L.A. Other cities such as New York walking is easy and is a top choice for most. When one google's public transportation in L.A. many websites pop up, but the most direct and helpful is the L.A tourist. (https://www.latourist.com/index.php?page=los-angeles-transportation) Found on the website is a detailed description of our public buses and links to the routes they

I’m suggesting the city government show increase the number of public transport in the city.

The rise of mass transit in the beginning seemed like a great idea everything did seem to go well and it really benefited the majority of Americans. Many people used mass transit as a faster efficient way to get around that they had never seen before. Electric trolleys as started in the article “The Rise and Fall of mass transit” were the start of the urban expansion that came about. At the time real estate owners and transit owners developed a good system to ensure economic development in the cities. In the early 1900s there was a decline in mass transit development although there was a development in automobile technology. As said in the passage entrepreneurs and private corporations came together and invested more in street cars these were the reason as to why there was such a corruption in mass transit. During this time Americans demands a better control of the mass transit system which was necessary and these large corporations had no interest in the welfare of the citizens rather only in making a large profit.

The firm can benefit from the California high spend rail (HSR). The HSR will result in economically growth and he environment will be healthier for the citizens of California. The conclusion is based on research from the HSR website, newspaper, and mazarines articles.

If investors know that it’s not going to be a problem fro anybody to get to a certain place, they are going to be eager to build infrastructure there without worrying about possible lack of demand. People are going to be more willing to move to new areas if they know they are not going to experience any problems in getting to the main clusters of the county. So by developing the Metrorail system, the county will be improving the overall economic performance of the Miami

Firstly, on average, for every billion dollars invested in the field of public transportation capital and operations creates and supports 36,000 jobs (2). Furthermore, these new 36,000 jobs will in turn result in approximately 3.6 billion dollars in business sales and approximately half a billion in federal, state, and local tax revenues (2). By maintaining this yearly funding of public transportation there lies the possibility of a whole new job sector emerging which could, in turn, stem long-term unemployment rates. Secondly, there is strong evidence to support a positive causation between public transportation and beneficial effects towards families and businesses. For example, for every dollar invested in the field of public transportation, approximately four dollars are generated in “economic returns” (2). There also exist statistics that claim that for every 10 million dollars invested in public transportation, there is potential for returns as high as 30 million dollars in business sales solely (2). Individually speaking, the average annual savings for one that takes public transportation and chooses to live with one less car is just a little less than 10 thousand dollars (9,900)(2). In order to show the saving nature of the public transportation system, estimates claim that without public transportation, costs from traffic congestion alone would have risen 19 billion dollars (2). The last of the outlined economic

High-speed rail is generally defined as trains capable of travelling at least 150 miles per hour. When the California High-speed Rail is completed, travelers can get on a train at the Transbay Transit Terminal in San Francisco and arrive at the Union Station in Los Angeles in two hours and forty minutes. The newly constructed high-speed rail in California is going to operate at over 200 miles per hour on average over the entire 800-mile system from San Diego in the south to Sacramento in the north. Before this, the only rail service that approaches high-speed standards in the U.S. is Amtrak’s Metroliner service between New York City and Washington D.C., which runs at 125 miles per hour [9]. The project of the high-speed

Between 1950 and 19980, the overall trend was downward and the National rail network’s pattern was always highest as well as it had its peak at 1,100 million trips in 1958. The gap between the figures for National rail network and the London Underground was increasingly narrow. The light rail and metro systems only appeared from early 1960s at the lowest level. In the last 25 years, the numbers of journeys by these three kinds of public transport bounced back and it tended to rise higher at the beginning. The numbers for National rail network and London Underground were similar and the numbers for London Underground went up to the peak of all numbers, whereas the numbers for Light rail and metro systems was still at the lowest level.

The first reason is to encourage people to use public transportation. Right now, many people feel that using public transportation, such

Public transportation can help reduce stress caused by driving, save money, and also protect our environment by reducing the number of vehicles on the road. In order to get more people off the road and into the public transportation system we must increase the number of buses and taxis that are available. We must also increase the number of stops available for daily bus routes. With more stops on the map more people are likely to use the bus system. Each city or town will be able to decide where more bus stops are needed and make the adjustments necessary to provide better service for the taxpaying citizens. Of course, none of this is possible without adequate funds in each town/city and the gas tax is guaranteed to provide those funds. Providing more public transportation will help us reach our ultimate goal of protecting the environment and ourselves.

For a further expansion in the market we would suggest that Metro should focus more on local relationships which can help the company overcoming several obstacles that it faced before. It is good to expand further in India as the change in government has created a more favorable position for Metro. Furthermore, the supply of infrastructure, the regulations in the retail segment has improved substantially and economy is much better

It seems that the express rail link will provide huge benefits to the economy and society of Hong Kong. With 100,000 passengers flow projected by the government, XRL is said to bring various benefits to the city. (Hong Kong Government, 2009).

In Hong Kong, public transit serves more than 90% of daily trips, and among them 40% are from the metro system, the Mass Transit Railway (MTR) (Wu, 2009). First built in late 1970s, MTR has a daily ridership of 5.6 million passengers and total revenue of HK$35.7 billion in 2012 (MTR, 2012). Until now, the system has 11 lines, 84 stations and a total route length of 218.2 km with an average fare of HK$7.1 per trip (MTR, 2012). It runs 7 days a