Lack Of Aggression Analysis

The article See Aggression...Do Aggression discusses aggression, which is the biggest social problem facing America and the entire world. The article delves deeper into the question of why people are aggressive. Psychologists have theoreticized that aggression may stem from genetics or pent up frustration, but the most common and accepted is the theory that aggression is learned. This final reason for aggression is what prompted Bandera, a founder of the “social learning theory” and his team, Dorothea and Sheila Ross, to conduct “the Bobo doll study.”

Force can be defined as any touching of another person in order to accomplish a legal justification. If a person is touched without any legal justification, the officer can be held liable civilly and criminally. Force by security can either be “hands on” or “hands off.” Hands on approaches often occur when an officer has to break up a fight, or when making an arrest. The officer uses certain defensive techniques to subdue the assailant, hand cuffs, OC sprays, and tasers are often used for these purposes. Hands off security involves no touching unless the officer is attacked, the officer is allowed to respond with force only when there is an imminent danger created by the assailant. So what situations require use of force? Number one: imminent threats. Assaults in progress always call for a use of force, or the retreat of the aggressor. Security officers

Violent physical assault on a U.S citizen can be gauged as cruel and unprofessional. Police force should only be used if it helps with an arrest or if they sense their life is in danger. If a citizen is resisting or attacking an officer, then force would be acceptable to a certain extent. Even if there was resistance, the officer could easily restrain the citizen in other ways as a result of proper training. When police officers have the numbers to help arrest a citizen the use of force, should be avoided as much as possible. When the citizen is already in custody and

When appropriate use of force is acted upon, it is in cases that are permitted under certain circumstances such as that of in defense either in themselves, individuals or a group of individuals. When broadly speaking upon law Enforcement cases, no two are the same, they may be similar, but never the same, therefore there is no universal set pair of rules to follow during a potentially threatening situation. Officers have obtained proper certified training to judge when proper use of force is required to regain control.

Policing is a dangerous profession. As police officers, we have been entrusted the great responsibility to protect life and property and arrest criminal offenders. “The apprehension of criminal offenders and protection of property must at all times be subservient to the protection of life.” It is our policy to value and preserve human life, to include our own. Efficient and effective use of force can reduce injuries to both suspects and officers. The ultimate goal when applying use of force, is to make an arrest and bring a potentially unsafe situation to a smooth and peaceful conclusion as soon as possible. Many officers preferred that the subject allow himself to be arrested peacefully, but when that is not the case, officers must make

Police use of force can be described as being the "amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by an unwilling subject.”(nij.gov, p.1) The stages

While i was approaching both individuals, i observed the arrestee strike the victim with an open hand, which made contact with the left side of the victims face. At that moment i immediately grabbed the arrestee by his arm, and advised him he is

The Southern United States also plays into his aggression due to the climate and heat and how that effects a person. While we do know that studies in six cities found that violent crimes are more apparent during hot weather (Anderson & Anderson, 1984), at 8AM this seems to be a moot point but if a heat stroke was effecting his overall week it is possible that the intense weather was a the start of the buildup that lead up to the shooting.

A paranoid person seeing this card would say they had an argument and he became violent to the women, and she feared he was going to kill her. She had to kill him to protect herself. The women is feeling relief that she is safe.

The use of force by law enforcement officers is described by the Internal Association of Chiefs of Police as the “amount of effort required by police to compel compliance by an unwilling subject” (National Institute of Justice, 2016). The amount of force used by the law enforcement officer is situational based dependent the officer’s perception and the subject’s actions (National Institute of Justice, 2016). When a law enforcement officer uses force, they should only use the amount of force necessary to de-escalate the incident, make an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm (National Institute of Justice, 2016). Law enforcement officers are trained on force continuum, which includes verbal and physical restraint, less-lethal

police departments have some kind of UOFC in place. Just having an officer present can resolve a situation. An officer should always conduct themselves professionally and in a non-threatening manner. If necessary they should use non-threatening and calm demands, being calm may help to calm the situation and the person or persons they are dealing with. The next step to gaining compliance would be hand control. This would be acquired by restraining the individual with the least amount of force necessary to obtaining the compliance needed of the individual. The next level would be less than lethal control by means of instruments such as a baton, projectiles, chemicals like pepper spray to restrain combative individuals. The last resort is lethal force. This should only be used if an individual is of a serious threat to the officer or another

51). The results suggested that 2,068 (58.4%) of the 3,544 encounters involved force being used at least once against the suspect (Terill, 2003, p. 65). Verbal force (50.3%) constituted the majority of all force used against suspects, and involvement of physical force in 21% of the encounters. In the breakdowns of physical force, pat downs were used in 12% of all encounters; handcuffing resulted in 10.4% of encounters; firm grip in 3.3%, and takedown maneuvers in 1.3% of the police-suspect encounters (Terill, 2003, pp. 66-65). In relation to force imposed against suspects when resistance is presented, in 3,397 of the total encounter, 57.5% of police officers imposed force against the individual when no resistance is presented; verbal force in 37.1% of the contacts; restraint in 18.6%; and impact at 1.8% of all encounters (Terill, 2003, p. 76). In addition, the number of encounters resulting in force imposed increased as resistance from the suspect increased as well. When suspects began to show some resistance during the encounter, the odds of police applying verbal force increased to 68.3%; physical restraint increased to 11.1% (Terill, 2003, p. 74). Based on the results yield from this study, the majority of force used against suspects are verbal; physical force were unlikely to be imposed, and higher level of physical force were rarely used in police-suspect

The key to understanding what constitutes force is looking at it from the police officer's point of view. If the officer is attempting to place handcuffs on you and wants you to get on the ground in order to put the cuffs on, you need to get on the ground. A citizen doesn't have the right to tell the officer how to make the arrest. This is something that you can discuss with your attorney. What is important is that you follow instructions during the arrest procedure.

On the streets, based on the situation and facts on hand, I would obviously try de-escalation and try communicating with that person. If that didn’t work, I would use the next reasonable level of force, whether that be pepper spray, a taser, a baton, or my service weapon. I would also take into consideration on who is around me. If I’m in a large crowd of people, I don’t necessarily want to try to shoot someone or use pepper spray. Perhaps a taser or baton would work better, but this really all depends on what is occurring.

The amount of effort that is required by law enforcement to persuade compliance by an unwilling subject is a description of use of force. There is not just one definition for use of force. A majority of the law enforcement agencies carry policies that define their use of force. Included in these policies is the actions that an officer can have to undertake in a situation. Whenever an officer has to use force, they need to understand and know what the appropriate force needed at the time. To help guide the officers, agencies have a Use-of-Force Continuum. They must take the continuum one step at a time. One officer, in the appropriate situation, may jump steps and end up on the bottom of the continuum. The steps start out as officer presence, verbalization, and empty-hand control. Then the less-lethal methods and lethal force.