Lady Of Chains: Comparing The Book And Movie

The first similarity and difference I found was In the movie was that there is a witch in the movie and no witch in the book. Along with this, there is a friend of Kino’s who dies. This is important to the story because he was the man who was going to sail with Kino to the capital. Overall, the characters in the movie that weren’t in the book affected the plot. One

Some things are different in the book and movie. Like Sunset Towers and Money in both versions. Sunset towers is luxurious in the book but a bad place to live downtown. The money the will was worth 200 million but in the movie it is worth 20 million. Another difference is that the Wexlers moved to Sunset Towers because they had no money, but in the book they moved because they had money. In the movie Jake Wexler is paying off his debt though they have money in the book. Jake Wexler is a

That is why the point of view is different in the book and in the movie. The second difference is the characters. The characters are different because in the book there are sixteen characters and in the movie there are only ten. The missing characters are Theo Theodorakis, Flora Baumbach, Madame Sun Lin Hoo, and Dr. Denton Deere.

movie didn't talk. Miles was mean in the movie but not in the book. The search party was not in the book. The Jailhouse was bigger in the movie. The Man in the Yellow Suit found miles and Jesse everywhere they went. Mae and Tuck was put in jail in the book . in the book the tucks ran away during an Intense storm. in the movie the tucks Escape while riding in a Carriage .in the book the tucks family lives in a faded red home in the woods. In the movie they lived in a log cabin. the Man in the Yellow Suit would take the woods if he found the girl in the book.. The Man in the Yellow Suit went to find the Tucks and Winnie, but mainly to find the spring. Jesse tells Winnie the water from the spring is dirty in the book. Jessie tells Winnie

Regardless of all these similarities, there were also very noticeable differences. One of these would be the newly-introduced cousins of the family. In the book, these characters were never mentioned, which could prove confusing at first if you didn't remember much from it. Not only did they add them, but they showed much more segregation-related issues that many people of color would have faced in the south as well; also included in the film.

Both book and film show the kids taking care of each other. They both show the kids planning to leave to New York. Although the plots are the same, the movie leaves out lots of the scenes that I considered important. The tone is more effective in the movie than it is in the book. The film doesn’t really show the happier scenes, it mainly shows the saddest ones.

Winnie foster got mad at her parents. She went outside and sate on the porch. Then she went in the woods. Then

Movies that are based on a book are not always the same. In social studies class, we read a book called Our America. The book is about two boys named LeAlan jones and Lloyd Newman becoming reporters and interviewing people in their neighborhood to show people what it’s like in the ghetto life. The movie that went with the book was very different. In the movie and the book Our America, there were many differences such as Principal Williams momentarily becoming an antagonist, Davis Isay was more important, and Lloyd’s life was focused on more in the movie.

As well as the movie having some character differences, some of the scenes were either cut out or added. One of the major differences in the movie is that Candy never comes into the room when Lennie and Crooks are talking to each other. This is an important part in the novel because when Candy comes in, Crooks finds about their future plan wants to get in on the deal. Except this scene is cut short in the movie and Candy never shows up at Crooks’ house. Another important part that is changed in the movie is the ending. The movie never shows Lennie have the illusions of his Aunt Carla and the rabbits lecturing him while he is waiting by the pond. Also, is seems as though in the movie George doesn’t hesitate to shoot Lennie, and it is all over very quickly. Furthermore, the important scene when Slim tells George, “You hadda, George” (107), never happens in the movie, but instead it ends with an image coming from within George’s imagination, a memory of the many happy times that he and Lennie had shared. There are also some scenes that are added into the movie, but only because the novel is so short, they needed to add things to make the

The actor choices from the film compare to what the book envisioned, but also contrast. The character of Daisy is not similar in the film to what the book

I was keen to know what happened after watching the movie of the first book as it leaves the viewer wondering what’s going to happen next. It was interesting to me that the movie had some differences to the book with regards to some of the details for example in the movie Adams parents were not in his life but in the book both his parents were there.

The book and the film were both simular, and yet different in many ways. An example would be, in the film, Ponyboy was walking to the drive-in and meeting Cherri and Marcia. Although in the book, Ponyboy began his journey by telling the readers about his experience about being jumped by the Socs and being threatened. The director probably had some options to pick from to leave out from the movie, and the director chosed this to leave out. Leaving out the part where Ponyboy was jumped was an effective move because without the experience Ponyboy was lost and helpless because he did not know what to do when he and Johnny got cornered in the park by Bob and other Socs.

The book and movie are completely different. It 's like comparing apples and oranges. (I 'm assuming that you used the newest version with Guy Pierce). The biggest difference is probably the ommision of Haydee and Maximillien and Valentine (three of the main character) and the addition of Jacapo. Jacapo does is in the book, but he is never a large character.

Normally, when a movie is made about a story in a book the two stories are not exactly the same. The movie is adjusted by adding small details or leaving out some parts in order to make the story more

In comparison with the book, the movie remains remarkably faithful to C.S. Lewis’ story, and the his passion for fantasy and children’s novels shines through. The director of the movie, didn’t add any new characters, which to me was great because sometimes when new typescripts are added, it takes away from the message and as well the main characters. While reading the book before seeing the movie, my expectations were higher of the character, the White Witch and they weren’t met in the movie. I would recommend that you should read the book first so you can really understand what’s going on and get a good feel on what C.S. Lewis was trying to say.