Lands End

Today’s world competition is very strong in every kind of businesses. Every organisations must provide high quality products or services in order to survive, however their competitors also providing the same or comparable products or services. An important way to an organisation to get an edge over its competitors is to provide extra service to satisfy and delight their customers, which can retain them and also gain new customers. Therefore the achievement of customer satisfaction must be a major objective in all organisations.

A store like Nordstrom has built a successful model on availability of knowledgeable salespeople, and other luxury or near-luxury retailers would be advised to pay attention. But a mass retailer like Target is not dependent on “high touch” customer service; rather, the most important things it can do to satisfy its shoppers are to ensure that goods are on the shelf and the checkout process is efficient. As more consumers migrate to

Customer satisfaction is the customer’s evaluation of a good or service in terms of whether it has met their needs and expectations (Vander Schee, 2016). The culture of the organization is to focus on delighting customers rather than on selling products (Lamb, Hair, & McDaniel, 2017). An example of a highly satisfied customer would be Nicole Snow, who owns a small business in Maine. One day she reached out to FedEx on social networks and asked for help in getting her supply chain set up. The team responded immediately and helped her solve the problem (“FedEx,” 2015). Here customer satisfaction is greatly shown the customers’ needs and expectations have been met by

Another top stakeholder within Costco’s organization is its customer clientele. After careful research, the author noted several variables that contributed towards Costco’s highly-rated customer service and satisfaction ratings that speak from sales in addition to positive feedback. The author will briefly dissect this stakeholder group and display, in writing, why this group aids Costco in providing low prices on select items, its continuous service method which has proven, both financially and through praise, to be one of the more successful methods in retail, and to demonstrate why Costco

In the competitive market where corporations vie for customers, customer satisfaction is an integral element of the organizational business strategy. Wal-Mart customers’ satisfaction ratings have powerful effects on the organization’s bottom line. If Wal-Mart’s customer satisfaction rate drops, this tells the organization that there are problems in areas of the organization that affects the customer satisfaction rating. Wal-Mart will have to correct these problems to ensure the organization customer satisfaction rate improves. A drop in satisfaction ratings for the organization affects sales and profit. Wal-Mart always ensures that their customer satisfaction rating is high enough to keep current customers and to attract new customers. Customer satisfaction is the key element of Wal-Mart to exist in this modern day world of business with such a diverse society.

A firm’s performance and financial standing can be measured by a number of valuations and techniques. Financial data is used to perform a financial analysis on a business to determine the company’s stability, profitability, and liquidity. For instance, J.C. Penney’s financial stability was drastically damaged leaving all external and internal stakeholders questioning the value of the department store. J.C. Penney’s has a number of stakeholders that should always be satisfied while making business decisions. One of J.C. Penney’s most valuable stakeholders is its customers. J.C. Penney’s customers expect the retailer to provide them with up-to-date products at an affordable cost, while also expecting trained personnel to attend to their needs. One of J.C. Penney’s main goal is to get new and repeated customers; therefore, it is critical for J.C. Penney’s to develop a strong understanding of its customer base. During J.C. Penney’s failure, many customers reported that employees did not make an effort to develop a professional relationship with them.

Within these stores, there are many different departments and groups of job roles including sales floor customer assistants, store operations, section managers and store managers (Careers.marksandspencer.com, 2016). Marks and Spencer are devoted to providing great value and services to their shareholders and customers within their business, which suggests customer service is a key part within their organisation (Corporate.marksandspencer.com, 2016). The strategic direction of Marks and Spencer is to prioritise profitability as well as growing the business, alongside improving performance in all areas of the organisation (Corporate.marksandspencer.com, 2014). This essay will focus on sales floor customer assistant departments within Marks and Spencer.

Have you ever went to a grocery store or a retail shop and received bad services? Did you want to go back to the store after they treated you so poorly? One thing I have learned from working in a grocery store is that no business can be successful without the support of their customers. In this paper, I will be comparing and contrasting two major companies, Hot Topic and Nike. By comparing these two successful companies, I will prove that companies have no chance of success unless they take care of their customers. I will compare their missions and history. These comparisons will prove that good customer care is the key to any company's success.

Best Buy, a familiar retailer in the technology world, is struggling to stay on top. Online and mass stores have cornered the market in terms of convenience, customer service and price matching. The recent closing of over two hundred stores alongside falling sales has experts predicting that the giant won’t be in business long. Using a results-only work environment (ROWE), Best Buy has removed the customer from the equation and forced many employees out. A marketing disaster, Best Buy must change its marketing strategy from sales-based to a customer-based to stay afloat.

For example, Primark is offering to their customers the high quality, at value for money. It is supported by service promised by

Customer satisfaction and service quality are the two important components that direct anyone’s attention in every concept related to marketing, services, etc. (Spreng and Mackoy, 2006). In today’s competitive era, the success lies in

The elusive goal of customer satisfaction has long provided companies with endless headaches and difficult decisions. In the end, associating specific customer satisfaction metrics to company profit and loss would provide the undeniable proof needed to make changes, and then invest the required capital to address any concerns. Starbucks, not unlike the rest of the business world, has found itself in the same situation. At a basic level, the argument that more investment in customer service creates higher customer satisfaction has already been fundamentally agreed upon. However, more specifically, Starbucks must decide if a reinvestment of $40M annually in

Organizations like Amazon store realized that attaining long-term customer value through delivery of quality services is the key to their existence. Also, be alert to the customer’s needs and wants, because having a loyal base of satisfied customer brings relevant performance indicators. For example, increase in sales improved profits, and possible higher market share (Shamma & Hassan, 2013).

It would have been good if this fundamental vision was in place right at the very beginning of the company’s formation. In the end it is the customers that make the company, so it makes sense to work towards satisfying this customer relationship. To become profitable and achieve market share are secondary objective that can be measured on a annual basis and overall company well being targets can be rewarded with incentives that link into the company’s performance as opposed to individual contribution to the company’s success.

General knowledge is that customers are more perceptive to losses than gains which means that worse-than-expected service is more damaging than better-than-expected service is beneficial (Rust et al. 1999).