Language In English Essay

Currently, there are over 6,000 living languages spoken in the world. Even with these many languages spoken, people are still discriminated in America. Language is a part of many cultures and daily life, for example in Amy Tan's "Mother Tongue", Tan says "I've heard other terms used, 'limited English,' for example. But they seem as bad, as if everything is limited, including people's perceptions of the limited English speaker." Language should not be a border where people today are still treated as "broken".

My language is a reflection of my personal identity, culture, the peer groups I associate with, my family and my life experiences.

Language has clearly become a powerful force in many countries where different communities actually want to split apart on the sole basis on the language they speak. An article about Spain’s language diversity explains how people feel so passionate about their native languages that the country had to create autonomous regions for each of the major languages, and people are still fighting to have their language become the dominant dialect (Berdichevsky 276). This is also seen repeatedly in America’s history where immigrants to the country struggle to keep their languages alive. These immigrants realize the important role that language plays in keeping a community together, and many immigrants from the same country will choose to live by each other in America and are resentful when they are forced to learn English. My own great-grandparents chose to live in an Italian neighborhood in Ohio when they first came from Italy so that their culture would not be lost. This allowed my grandma to learn Italian as well as English, and even though she was going to an English school she was still taught the morals of her culture because she was able to talk with the older Italian people who did not speak English. My grandma says that this has helped her throughout life because even though she lives in America she says, “I respect my Italian heritage,” and that it has helped “build my confidence” (12 April 2003).

There have always been two major approaches of language. There is the prescriptive approach where the prescriptive linguist believes that there is a way that language should be spoken and written. On the other hand, there is the descriptive approach where the descriptive linguist thinks that a language is the way native speakers of the language use it and the way they agree upon. The issue of whether putting relational words toward the end is adequate or not has the two methodologies debating if the rule should be a rule since the usage of the language in reality contradicts the rule. The speakers of the dialect are consummation sentences and provisos with a relational word, however the first manage says to never end a sentence with a relational word. This made a progressing wrangle about whether ending a sentence with a relational word is adequate or not. To better comprehend this perplexity, one must comprehend what a relational word is. The most fundamental definition of preposition is giving by Spear as he defines preposition as “a word that is used to create a relationship between a noun and other words in a sentence“ (77) . Probably the most widely recognized relational words are: on, in, to, by, for, with, at, of, from, as, under, over, about, above, beneath, behind, and between. Also, the general rule is that preposition stand before the word it governs. However, there are some grammarians and linguists and language experts who think that placing prepositions at the

The question of whether the U.S should have an official language and whether bilingual language education can be accepted is highly controversial. Hispanic concentrated areas like California, the Southwest and Florida are especially troubled by the proposed English-only movements. People stands for English-only movement claims that linguistic divisions is harmful to political unity, while single official language can provide the chance to the narrow down the distances between the rich and the poor. On the other hand, disbelievers of English-only movements are worrying about the violation of civil liberties which are people’s rights stated in the Constitution

As everyone agrees, English has been America’s common language since its foundation. In recent years, however, English is in danger of losing its status as a national language. As you would see in metropolises and cities in Border States, use of non-English languages among immigrants has been increasingly common. Some immigrants stick to their native language in everyday life and can’t speak English well even after several years of immigration. Because the lack of common language causes a lot of problems, some argue that the use of other languages should be legally restrained. But other people oppose it by saying that restraint will put non-English speaking people under pressure and the lack

Language is the second important event that had change human civilization. Language allows us to communicate with each other, to share information. Language facilitate learning. Knowing language fascinate opportunities to develop listening, speaking, reading and writing skills and to speak with confidence. Language is a tool to express feelings, emotions, and ideas, construct social identity; it builds economic relationships, friendships, and culture ties.

Language is the universal connection that brings all humans together. We share this common ground to communicate. The three major points that I would like to focus on are: How does language influence our culture? Does it define us, or does it refine us? And lastly, the impact that language has on our societies.

In this essay I will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of reason and language as ways of knowing.

Many American citizens argue that as a nation, English should be recognized as the official language. Even though the majority of people in America speak or understand English, legally placing this as the nation’s language will have several negative consequences. For people who side on making it the official language, they feel that communicating with be easier and that allowing there to be no official language will erase “American” culture. Not only are those statements not true, but they can also be deemed as xenophobic and racist. Constitutionally setting English as the official language can not only promote xenophobia, it can also erase minority culture; moreover, English was not the first or only language spoken in America when it was first being colonized.

Can contemporary discourse presume a community of interest? In order to answer this question, one is forced to first answer the question, can language be used to reveal anything new? If the answer is yes, then how can it do this and how can we employ it to do this for us. Also, one is forced to ask what is it exactly that we are looking for? Once we’ve found it, how can we use it to improve our present condition? Plato and Descartes both believe that language can indeed improve our conditions through it’s revelation, and both give methods to attain new knowledge. Although vastly differing, in that Descartes builds knowledge from the ground up, while Plato works from a distorted view, and seeks to clarify it, their

Language is something that can be both seen and heard; it can be diverse or standard. Language can be defined in many ways; a set of rules, physically present in the form of speech, or a set of social customs regarding how to communicate (Clark, as cited in Gee & Hayes, 2011, p. 6). Essentially, language is a fluid term, with many meanings. Language can also be seen in many ways including the written word, facial expressions, body language and sign language. For instance, body language is a form of non-verbal communication using gestures and body parts to convey a message, and is a common form of language all over the globe. The body responds to emotions such as anger or happiness, for example, when a person is excited their pupils dilate and they may become short of breath due to an increased heart rate (Sharma, 2011, p. 1). This is one of the ways in which language can be seen. Language is also extremely diverse, in fact, it is estimated that there are over 6800 languages in the world (Brown & Ogilvie, 2009, p. 2). There are also multiple ‘Englishes’ such as Standard Australian English (SAE), Aboriginal English, Hinglish (Hindi English) and Chinglish (Chinese English). David Crystal, a British linguist, explains that English is a global language and when countries adopt the English language, it adapts to suit its circumstances, creating a new dialect (BritishCouncilSerbia, 2013). Hence, language can be both seen and heard and can be diverse or standard.

Language,as a means of communication, permits people to convey their ideas and represent their communicative aims. Catford (1978) outlines language as a kind of shaped human behavior. For human beings, it is believed to be the most important way of interacting intheir social situations.

Over one-thousand, five-hundred million people speak English worldwide. It is used in commerce, legislation, and as the basis for communication between countries. Many adolescents learn how to speak English in their early childhood, and many universities worldwide mainly teach in English. Historically, the most widely spoken language has originated from a very powerful nation. Thus, the influence of English-speaking countries is exceptionally great, incentivizing the widespread use of the language. Although English may be deemed the “international language”, it is one of the most difficult dialects and a simpler language may better serve the propose of a universal vernacular.

English as the foreign language in Kurdistan is taught from the first year of School up to the university level. The Audio-Lingual system, which was proposed by American etymologists in 1950s, was created from the guideline that a dialect is most importantly an arrangement of correspondence; sounds for social composing is an optional subsidiary framework for the recording of communicates dialect (Carroll, 1963). Consequently, the reason for the Audio-Lingual strategy is to utilize the target dialect openly. As for each this strategy, discourse is given need in outside dialect educating. The Audio Lingual method shows dialect through dialogues that emphasis on bias of understudies. Larsen-Freeman (2000) expresses that understudies will attain to informative skill by shaping new propensities in the target dialect and defeating the old propensities for their local dialect). The Audio-Lingual system considered dialect basically as appearance of conduct to be learned through the arrangement of right discourse propensities (Thornbury, 2000). As such, the objective of this technique is to frame local dialect propensities in learners (Dendrinos, 1992).