Las Vegas Legal Case Study

Expanding the business and adding more property agreements with 3rd parties and creating international property chain to make the business gain geographic diversity.

Drew A. Senulis is an Associate Attorney with Patel Gaines. He represents clients in a broad range of complex commercial real estate litigation and transactions. Drew emphasizes that though a great number of business people may understand their industry and business procedures, some may not be wholly aware of the legal nuances that can influence their business. He also understands that a vast amount of attorneys remain inexperienced with business operations – making them less effective advocates. Drew’s focus is to close that gap for his clients by successfully combining his strong foundation of legal expertise and business experience.

In both the United States and Nevada, the Supreme Court is the highest level in the Judicial Branch with the Federal Supreme Court making decisions that affect the entire nation. Supreme Court Justices in Nevada serve only a six-year term and do not have term limits. Although, this has always been the case for the Nevada Judiciary branch, many individuals felt that it was time for a change and attempted to ratify a new appointment system. Each state within the United States has its own Constitution and while the purpose of this document has evolved, its overall function has remained the same; to establish rules and regulation that best represent the people of Nevada.

Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY:

Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark case because now almost everybody knows about this case because of the Miranda Rights that were a direct result of this case, and the Supreme Court’s ruling. The Supreme Courts ruling that it was against Miranda’s rights, then because of this decision they made the Miranda Rights. The Supreme Court was correct in the ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, which they ruled in favor of Ernesto Miranda because his fifth and sixth amendment rights were violated. They were violated because he was not told his rights when he was arrested, and they did not give him the right to a lawyer. (Miranda v. Arizona www.infoplease.com)

My concerns about the case of Hiibel v. the State of Nevada was first, his daughter safety. The second, difficult not obeying the law. There is a saying, to obey is better than sacrifice. Third, if the police officers dispatched to a wrong location, it causes such events. Proper information given to the officers during an emergency will help. Individuals who are not responding, it may be a chance of getting arrested, detained and charged. An example, Sept 4, 2014, in Missouri a man strolling without any suspicion of crime was tackled and arrested for not identify himself. A report by PINAC media confirmed the man detained cost $500 for bail. These cases have their positive and negative future results in the nation.

December 2 2017 Bryant Langheim Final Paper Do you ever wonder who the person who helps attorneys or who you speak to get a attorney. The answer is a paralegal and that is the career I’m interested into going to school for. I have a lot of strengths, weakness, and I will tell about becoming a paralegal. Although that’s not all I will also explain steps and the process I have a job in criminal justice.

In Doucette v. City of Santa Monica, the defendant city enacted a solicitation ordinance, whose purpose was to impose reasonable place and manner limitations on solicitation, in order to protect the general public from abusive solicitations. Doucette, 955 F. Supp. at 1201. The ordinance prohibited “requests made in person seeking an immediate donation of money or other items of value” in areas including bus stops, public transportation vehicles or facilities, public parking lots or structures, outdoor dining areas, and within fifty feet of automated teller machines. Id. Plaintiffs filed suit against the city, alleging that the ordinance violated the First Amendment. Id. at 1198. The city argued that the ordinance "only seek[s] to regulate locations

A muddy shoe print was use to link an unnamed man who was on the run from the police to his vehicle which was carrying 3 ½ pounds of marijuana. Police detective Chad Larner attempted to pull over this man in a Mazda for speeding but he would not stop. The man was eventually able to lose Larner. He then parked the car, got out and tried to hide. The police later found the car and found the man two blocks away. He attempted to bribe a young woman to walk with him by saying that he would give her $40. The woman told the police that he told her that he was in a police chase in which he was not the driver and he was trying to hide from the police. When the police searched the car they found four bags of the 3 ½ pounds of marijuana. The police also

The 9th Circuit Federal Court recently affirmed a district court case that upholds an ATF interpretation on medical marijuana card holders and the purchase of firearms. The court’s decision makes it illegal for an individual to possess, transfer, or purchase firearms if they hold a medical marijuana card.

The main augment in the Riggins v. Nevada case was the forced administration of antipsychotic medication during trial. Riggins’ believed it violated his guaranteed rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Dr. Inman, you seem to always ask very challenging questions that have me second guessing much of what I have researched.

Gaming has been a large part of Nevada’s history, and has become an even larger part of our economy. In the early years of state hood Nevada struggled with the question of whether or not gaming should be legal. We see the first government involvement in the industry in 1864, before Nevada was even a state. The territorial legislature of the time outlawed any game of chance. In order to enforce the ban penalties were to be levied on anyone caught playing any game of chance. It is not until 1869, 5 years later, that we see certain forms of gaming become decriminalized. From 1869 to 1911 these games of chances remained legal, and the government played a minimal role in the regulation or control of the industry. Once again, in 1911 a progressive movement succeeded in criminalizing gaming in Nevada once again. Gaming would remain legal in Nevada up until the aftermath of the great depression in 1931. (Gamig history website)

Gordon R. Levinson of The Levinson Law Group is that attorney. Gordon has extensive experience handling pedestrian accident cases. He also represented some of the largest insurance companies in this country. As an attorney working in the insurance attorney, he learned how these companies treat accident victims. He learned their tactics. Now

The Glippery company has been one of our oldest clients, being services by our lawyers since 1992. Most recently we've been helping them in solving one of the business disputes inside their company's management. Eventually, it never have gone to the court hearings, which was our client's desire. Result: settlement.

Growth is usually associated with access to, and conservation of cash while maximising profitable business. People often see venture capital as the magic bullet to fix everything, but it isn't. Owners