Revolutions hit Latin America, and the fight for independence would change history forever. In the early 1800’s the lower class known as Mulattos, Mestizos and mid-class creoles were in a battle for a new form of government, against the abundant and powerful peninsulares. Rebellions in Latin America were fueled by the unjust distribution of food, wealth, and power.
Because of an uneven distribution of food, revolts arose around Latin America. Creoles and Peninsulares had a decent amount of land depending on their wealth, but the peasants were not equivalent. The Simulation revealed the peasants had little to no land, but it was one of their only ways of providing for their families. This spawned trouble because they were frustrated about the unfair divide in resources and that peninsulares were wealthy and abundant, but they could barely provide for their families. A second piece of data is from the DBQ. ”,In 1808-09 drought produced a great mortality among Mexico’s livestock and decimated [destroyed] the harvest… Food prices tripled.” (Document D, Paragraph 1). This shows poverty-stricken people struggling with food
…show more content…
Money was a big problem because majority of peasants could not afford to live or pay taxes and still live abundantly. Document D shows that food prices almost tripled when the drought hit. “Under the economic system called mercantilism, the spanish officials took the majority of the profits they found in the Americas.”(Background Essay, paragraph 3). Policies that gave officials and wealthy citizens more money were common in Latin America. The effect this had on Latin America was that some were filthy rich and others were hardly getting by. The people wanted more say in where resources and money were distributed and they began to rebel. Another piece that shows economic failure was Document C, where they talk about the Spanish economy and how it was like a monopoly
Latin American Independence was the drive for independence from Spain and France by the Latin American people. There were many contributing factors that ultimately led to the uprising of Latin American colonies. Europe's strong hold on the economic and political life of Latin America, was creating friction between the Latin Colonies and the European nations. Eventually, this would become enough for the Latin American people and the drive for independence from France and Spain would begin.
The Latin American revolution did not fulfill the goals of the revolution. Although they gained independence from Spain, the social construct did not change. This is the opposite of the Haitian Revolution. In Haiti, the slaves fought against slavery in many violent protest including burning of plantations. Ultimately, the whole social construct reversed from French officials and les grands blancs on top and the slaves on the bottom to les grands blancs not being a part of society and the slaves on top. In the long run, the large plantations supported the whole economy of Haiti and once slavery was abolished, the small farms did not come close to the same profit. In this way, the economical impact of the revolution was not successful, but the
As a mix of diverse people gave rise to a new social structure and introduced a cultural blending in the Spanish empire, located in Latin America, eventually a growing population of lower-classed non-white people became angered at the privileges of the whites. Being denied the status, wealth and power that were given to whites, the mestizos and the mulattoes resented the Spanish. Masses of enslaved Africans and the many populations that were looked down upon suffered economic misery and longed for freedom, eventually leading revolutions across Latin America. Those revolted were motivated by love for one’s race and freedom, like what Father Miguel Hidalgo says in Document A of the Latin American DBQ, “we are not Europeans; we are not Indians;
There was a huge revolution in the country of Mexico that started in the year 1910, led by Porfirio Diaz, the president of Mexico in 1910. In the 1860’s Diaz was important to Mexican politics and then was elected president in 1877. Diaz said that he would only be president for one year and then would resign, but after four years he was re-elected as the President of Mexico. Porfirio Diaz and the Mexican revolution had a huge impact on the country of Mexico that is still felt in some places today.
The Mexican Revolution was the culmination of a mass of political, economic, and social tension that accompanied the regime of the dictator Porfirio Diaz. The Revolution began with the aims to overthrow Diaz, but the Revolution had a pronounced effect on the organization of Mexico's government, economy, and society.
This statement is completely false. Both revolutions sprung from the same desires: independence. The colonists wanted to be free from England, while the Latin American countries wanted to separate from Spain.
All these tasks were still pending in Latin America. As a result of this, endemic political instability of the region, civil wars, coup de etat and popular uprisings frequently took place. Revolutions, as in Mexico, Bolivia and Guatemala, tried to make more or less deep changes, but ended in stalemates or were finally defeated. In the revolutionary processes of Mexico and Bolivia massive land seizures took place, following the classic rules of the agrarian revolutions. These cases contrasted with Cuba, where the agrarian reform and the industrial nationalizations were driven by the rebel army and the popular militias directly led by the revolutionary
There were many causes of Revolutions in Latin America and Europe in the 1800s. Some were caused by colonies trying to get independence from a mother country. Some were caused by countries trying to change their government, and others were caused by regions trying to unify nations. Haiti worked to get its independence from France by making the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen which gave the right to vote to all free men, including mulattoes and people of mixed African and European ancestry. Mexico worked to get their independence from Spain by having many fights, or mini revolutions. Miguel Hidalgo made the first public call for independence. On September 16, 1810, Hidalgo rang a bell in his home town calling the members
We have seen waves of democratization continue to come and go and the most recent one that was successful in many countries was in the 70’s and the 80’s. Democratization was occurring all over Latin America, in Asia-Pacific countries such as Taiwan, the Philippines, Korea, and in Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, we did see an attempt to democratize the Middle East and North Africa through the Arab Spring. The Arab Spring has affected countless countries including Tunisia, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Syria, and even Saudi Arabia, however, there have been different effects and outcomes in these countries with only one becoming a constitutional democracy and others having been thrown into a civil war that continues to
Independence movements in the countries of: India, Us, and Latin America have been different and some ways has also been similar. There were many similarities between the causes of the American Revolution in 1776 and the Latin American Wars of Independence beginning in 1810. From the time of Columbus and the late 15th century forward, the Spaniards and Portuguese called the peoples of theAmericas Indians. The causes for the independence movements throughout Latin America during the colonial period were both varied and centralized around specific ideas. For some Latin American Countries, colonial rule was tolerated because the mistreatment of the population was eventually being attributed to an emerging class status system of mixed races
The passage of the article that is most interesting to me was Mixed Views on the Revolution. The revolution thrilled million in Latin America and Cuba. It showed that the arrogant Americans can be defied. The Americans cut the united states of America purchases sugar. Then America put a blocked all trade from Cuba. It banned every U.S. product except medicine and
As the music industry has become commercialized on an international level, people have argued that music culture has become somewhat homogeneous worldwide. America is often seen as the center of this commercial expansion; this can be seen in the case of music, as American artists have recently been achieving mainstream success with international audiences. Artists from the US are now able to tour internationally, and are well-received across the world. This paper analyzes the effects of this commercialization in Latin America, specifically in the context of hip-hop. Latin America has traditionally had its own unique musical style, but as a region it has not been immune to the influence and spread of commercialized hip-hop. The extent to which this movement has influenced Latin America is not always
The topic that I have chosen is student activism in Argentina during 1918. At this time there were many political reforms going on in the country. In 1916 the Radical Party’s candidate Hipolito Yrigoyen won the presidency and ended a thirty-six year reign of the wealthy landowning class party, the Conservatives. This election signaled a move toward a more democratic ideal one that could terminate social stagnation and inequalities. The Cordoba Reform might have started in 1918, but it’s effects were still being felt in the 1960’s and it is important to know where this movement came from, why it occurred, and why it still effected all of Latin America some 40 years later.
The consumer market in Latin America is very diversified, is not just an aggregate of low income and poor consumers, as most people would think. It is highly segmented, “their differences, based on lifestyle and attitudes, have a significant impact on shopping behavior”, “emerging consumer aspire to buy brands
Spanish America's thirst for Independence dates all the way back to the 16th century, following the French revolution's success to abolish the monarchy. South America's desire to become independent from Spain was ignited by the French revolution and the declaration of Independence of the United States. South American Creoles (los criollos) of the upper class led the process of Independence of the Spanish colonies. Many historians claim the wars of Independence were a creole affair and throughout this essay many arguments will be addressed to justify their claims, a strong case in their favour being the leader and liberator, Simón Bolívar, who drove the creoles and other ethnic origins to their quest for autonomy.