preview

Latin American Theology Fraternity

Decent Essays

In the 1970’s a group of theologians gathered together with the goal of liberating themselves apart from the traditional fundamentalist scope. In this gathering they began the grass roots group, The Latin American Theology Fraternity, known as The International Fellowship of Evangelical Students. The hopeful group had a goal to remain distinctive within the fraternal order. There were allowed the opportunity to speak in front of a worldwide denominationally diverse congregation in where each deliberated on spiritual matters close at heart to the Latin American community. The Chicago Declaration, in 1973, was a concerted effort to balance Christian belief with civic duty and responsibility. It was renewed again as crisis arose twenty years …show more content…

He is able to promote a new drive for the missionary field and delve further into thought on how evangelical mission work would better benefit the cause. The mission of the Christian church, on a more global scale, is to unite believers across the world. The core of this mission is the desire to share the Gospel to all, and to cross every border and from the perspective of the missionary. The theology established by Escobar, beginning with the fraternity, integrated church, state and social. In comprehending that evolving cultures perhaps may not consistently be in line traditionally with Christian beliefs, he conveyed that mission work should examine each new scenario and evaluate for the best outcome possible. He also promoted that missionary work should bind faith with task and insisted that what is most integral to a mission is the achievement of spiritual works. The long range goal is to bring forth involvement from each person who sustains the desire to socially share their faith. The church would then be able to combine both the desire to share its faith with the population, along with combine the mission objective, in a way to complete the projected …show more content…

Pannenberg does not perceive this issue as pertinent. He understood the Scriptures stated for followers to wait for a specific moment for final truth; that which exceeds our comprehension with what limited knowledge there is at hand, would be at this time revealed. Moltmann’a study is based on Biblical descriptions and to him the Scripture is more than mere folklore, and thereby are true testaments to events that occurred historically and should be thereby clarified as such. The view of Pannenberg on the historical acumen of the Bible is very much the same. When questioned, Grenz evaluated the theology of Pannenberg to be a notion of faithfulness, which is not the same as knowledge in addition to reason, but instead is based on public historical knowledge. Both Biblical interpretations by the two theologians claim the accuracy and historicity of the Scripture as opposed to considering it nothing more than a

Get Access