Laura Ingalls Wilder Little House

Many historians build up historical profiles on a certain person, place, idea, or event. Once they have their research done they look at the work of other historians

Strong, emotionally evocative imagery, and the use of symbolism and setting to draw out a feeling of nostalgia in the reader. Glorification of the past. All of these are used in a similar way that they might have been used by other authors during the period and reflect the state of literature at the time.

Literature is defined as written works published on a particular subject. Literature can also be viewed as witness, because it can be a source of proof based on the events it was written on. Literature as witness allows readers to get a deeper understanding of the issues that have happened based off of what the books are about. Those who read literary texts such as historical novels, memoirs and novels are witness to historical events. These texts can be viewed as witness because the events mentioned are based off of true life events. Some may argue historical fiction is not real and therefore could not be viewed as a reliable source. Even though historical fiction is made up of fictional characters, the conflicts that are mentioned are based

History intrigues me because, unlike other branches of education, it tells a story. The problem with telling a story is that over time, certain events are altered or omitted by those in power to suit their needs. I was once told that History is written by the victors. This includes not just the winners in war, but the political victors, champions of power, and the wealthy patronage of scoundrels seeking to whitewash their history of shame and corruption. History books, therefore rarely tell the whole story. An example could be when a noble, who just survived a political

This will help my writing by encouraging me to incorporate facts where they seamlessly fit in the text, as opposed to placing historical elements in careless, literary locations that create a lackluster reading experience. By continuing to read texts from the historical fiction genre, an aspiring (as well as current) writer can monitor the various ways historical research affects a piece, whether it be in a positive or negative

Characteristics/Genre: Historical fiction is a literary genre in which past events are formulated from genuine, factual history, but the plot of the story and characters are merely fictional. Postcolonial fiction is a literary genre in which appropriation of colonial language thus African is integrated and colonialism subtly attributed. Also, valorization, cultural identity, and racism is often found.

Knowing the historical context of a work is crucial to understanding both its general meaning and its deeper essence. Often times, authors use their works as outlets to freely express their personal feelings toward a social trend or issue. As such, the time in which a story is written can have a strong influence on the message the author is trying to convey to his or her reader. Their personal reflections can be asserted in many ways; among the most common being through the characters themselves and their development throughout the work, the setting, and the implied themes.

Context is important, what you know about an event or person can heavily influence your opinions on them and how you react in different situations. This is very important for authors writing in historical settings as often there are several very different sides to the story. Depending on the author’s personal context; their personal life experiences, and the historical context; what was happening in the world at the time, characters and events can be portrayed very differently. Different recounts of an event can be influenced by bias, the person may not know about other people and events, and they might tell the story differently depending on how they felt at the time. Examples of this can be found throughout the book Night by Elie Wiesel where he recounts his time spent in concentration camps throughout the second world war.

But, there are some books that with historical accuracy would just not make sense. By shaving out some of the historical facts, it allows the author to better teach the message he or she is trying to show more clearly. There are some books, though, like The Lord Of The Flies that found a good balance between truth and things that they left out in order to create a fiction novel, with the real truth and message of the piece being backed by truthful historical background. So, in words of conclusion, it does matter how historically accurate authors are when they write books and such. But, if they can use just enough truth to convince the reader and not take away from the message, the book or novel gets even

History writing has evolved much over time with the contributions of many people. In the modern sense, it can be traced back to ancient Greece and China, where historians Herodotus and Sima Qian began keeping records of human existence. Although they were not literally the first people to write history, together they are named the first great historians of the Western world and the East because of their individual innovations and extensive work that has long affected history writing up until this day. There is much to debate when it comes to the greatness of these ancient historians, and although some believe they were both important and successful in what their works, The Histories and The Records of a Historian, accomplished, others

A historian picks and chooses what information to analyze. By leaving out some information it is also a form of manipulation and twisting the past. I think that this shows a direct link between a historian and a mythologizer, whose job it is to twist history for another purpose.

These three essays meet the criteria for literary nonfiction by real facts, personal experiences, and places. The author in " The big book" used history to describe the past. He wrote biography about Robert Caro and experienced more than 30 years. That shows the reader that many events happened during past like Civil Right Act in 1964. Jones wrote, "For decades, 1775 Broadway-the old Newsweek building-was a wall of bricks. But in 2008, its owners decided that bricks made it look old, especially because the neighborhood was changing" helps the reader that buliding is getting old because it is bulit years ago.(313) A slice of history is mostly about facts instead of personal experiences or opinions. History existed and made the readers realized

New Historicism is a modern literary theory that focuses on how events, culture, and places within a society influence a written work. New Historicists analyze allusions to characteristics of the time period in which the work was written. By definition, new historicism seeks to discover the significance in a text by taking into account the work within the construction of the established ideas and assumptions of its historical era. Literary texts are entrenched with historical context and the author is seen as subject to the forces of the culture that he or she works within. New Historicists reject the New Critical principle that texts are autonomous and should be read without any comparison to history, and instead argue that texts are

The genre of historical fiction novels can be subdivided into many categories and often crosses genres, such as historical mysteries and romances. The traditional definition of the historical fiction genre is “fiction set in the past” where the author is writing from research rather than personal experience. This definition leaves a lot of room for interpretation, controversy, and contradiction. Critics in the media, even when they praise individual historical novels in their reviews, somehow manage to turn this praise into criticism of the genre as a whole. In 1950, author Howard Fast, a historical novelist himself, wrote: “This is an era of many historical novels, few of them good and very few indeed which have more than a nodding

In "Historical Text as Literary Artifact," Hayden White compares historiography with literature. Historians must rely on a "historical imagination," such as filling in the blanks or making assumptions about events. History is a "constructive" enterprise, and historians are trained to perceive patterns that may or may not have actually existed. If historians rely on the "historical imagination," as they must to complete their task, then historiography and historical literature are qualitatively similar. White admits that the "conflation of mythic and historical consciousness will offend some historians and disturb"¦literary theorists," (1713). Yet these two seemingly distinct disciplines have more points of convergence than is often assumed. The sensitivity surrounding White's claim stems from a common presumption that historiography equals absolute fact, whereas literature equals absolute fiction.