Laura Poppick 5 Weird Effects Of Daylight Saving Time Analysis

Despite the overwhelming evidence given by current research, many people refuse to change school start times because of the lack of noticeable impact some schools had or the impact it had on some people’s schedules. Pannoni cites a statement by the Iowa City Community School District which found that “the later start time . . . [did] not reduce the number of tardy students by any appreciable amount.” The principal of Ballard High School agreed by saying that he “would be surprised to see large improvements in either attendance or grade data compared with past years” (Pannoni). Many schools refused to change because of how the later start and dismissal times would affect extracurricular activities and students with jobs. This change would also interfere with bus schedules and childcare habits. However, these seem like small problems that can be overcome when the results are that “later school start times were associated with students sleeping longer at night, less tardiness, having higher test scores, being less depressed, using less caffeine and other drugs, . . . and experiencing fewer morning car crashes” (Fenwick).

Many adolescents and adults alike enjoy sleeping even though they do not get that much of it. People across the world wake up wishing they had just one more hour of sleep. Whenever daylight saving time (not plural) rolls around in the spring the hour lost is always dreaded even though it is balanced by the hour that is gained. Matt Schiavenza from The Atlantic says, “...Americans lose around 40 minutes of sleep on the Sunday night after the shift” (Schiavenza). Daylight saving time or DST is considered useless by many Americans and should be abolished. Americans do not dislike DST for no apparent reason. There are various studies and statistics backing the sheer uselessness of DST as well as it’s negative and harmful effects. Daylight savings time was originally created to decrease the cost of lighting and it is argued that this is the reason it is even kept around today. Keeping daylight savings in more recent years has caused more problems than it has fixed. Daylight savings causes many complications such as increased numbers of stroke and heart attack the week after and decreased productivity at work.

Daylight savings time poses an array of social benefits, including crime reduction and road safety. The diminution of crime is affected by daylight savings, for people tend to feel safer in the daylight and many crimes are believed to be influenced by lighting

According to a New York times article written by Anahad O’Connor (Source E). Our body runs in a circadian rhythm which uses daylight to determine the time of day and how we are feeling. Every time daylight savings comes around this rhythm is thrown off. While these facts are still being studied and are still up for debate it is important to take these threatening hazards into consideration. O’Connor says, “Other studies have suggested links between time change and increases in heart attacks, suicides, and accidents, though scientists say more study is needed.” These studies can be shown as a very important reason on why DST is more than just a time difference. It is affecting our well being and this is proving that DST is having a negative effect. In an experiment conducted by Matthew Kotchen and Laura Grant (Source F) they provided statistics on energy consumption in the spring and fall. Energy consumption is not constant throughout DST which proves that it can not be used as a way to save

Daylight saving can be good for the environment, Because of the less amount of the pollution being created by power plants, But there is a problem when it comes to daylight saving, the major problem is how it will affect people's lives on a daily basis who work daytime jobs and children who have to go to school ? Daylight saving effects would be strong but the effects can be diminished, simply by setting the time daylight savings takes place to a time when the sun is up and it can be safe to walk to school or work for people, and now it's safer for people and better for the environment and its resources.

Though its benefits are unclear, O’Connor uses a study to prove the sleep disruptions that those who partake in DST experience. “People’s peak activity levels were more intune with their body clocks than with the actual clock,” resulting in “restlessness, sleep disruption, and shorter sleep duration.” Additionally, O’Connor’s article declares that whether the system saves energy as it is promoted to do is “still a matter of debate.” This supports that Daylight Savings Time has vague benefits and distinct downsides, which leads to the conclusion that DST should no longer be implemented in our

Daylight savings is the act of setting clocks back an hour in March and setting them back in November; this is done as way to reduce the consumption of energy. Many claim that daylight savings has proven effective in reducing the usage in energy and helpful in other areas such as safety. However, others claim that daylight savings has not made an impact on energy usage and that it can affect the way people function. While daylight savings has proven effective in some areas, daylight savings should not be continued because of the individual effects it has on people’s mood and behavior.

Farmers state that grain grows the best after dew vanishes, so when the worker arrives late and leaves early the work is less valuable.Daylight during the day is more exceptional than when the sun goes down.Dairy farmers also does not agree with the time changing, because the cows hypersensitive when they want to be milked.Also when their milk needs to be transported earlier than regular time, there whole operation messes up. Farmers strongly disagree with DST because it disarrays the whole concept.

There is more population outside, taking pleasure of an extra hour of daylight and fewer criminals out waiting for their subsequently victim. In fact, accidents vs. pedestrians were reduced by “8-11%” just by that extra daylight hour several lives were saved.

A study in Minneapolis showed that when school hours were pushed back, attendance was raised in all grades. This has not only helped attendances, but also help higher students and parents emotions. These later starting times improved sleeping hours which made students happier and more alert at school. This alertness helped make better grades in classes that would normally be troublesome.

As daylight saving time begins this spring, many of you will probably lose an hour of sleep as your body adjusts to the new time. Thankfully, you don’t have to look tired when you show up to work or to your appointment with a facelift surgery.

Time of day can also affect the outcome of a tectonic hazard. If a volcanic eruption occurs over night the level of danger is often increased as most

Instead of waking up at 7:45, we now have to wake up at 6:45! Including traffic which will take 20-30 minutes and the time to get ready, make that 5:45!

Day shift vs. Night shiftAs nurses pursue their careers, they are often faced with the challenge of picking what shifts to work. Both day and night shifts have their own advantages and disadvantages and so when choosing a shift many factors are put into consideration. Night shifts have physiological effects to the body. One of these effectsis due to the disturbances in the circadian rhythm. A bundle of cells in the anterior hypothalamus,known as the suprachiasmatic nucleus,function as the pacemaker for these rhythms.(Urden, Stacy, & Lough, 2015) The circadian clockis like a timer that lets various glands know when to release hormones and also control mood, alertness, body temperature. Thecircadian rhythm functions are also influenced by other

The January effect is the phenomena where the average market return is higher in January when compare with other months. This anomaly has existed in New York Stock Exchange since 20th century (Rozeff & Kinney, 1976). Previous studies (Malkiel, 2003; Jones, 2007) have shown that market is at least weak-form efficient and slowly moving toward semi-strong form efficiency. This indicates that the investors could not earn superior return using past information or public information. The existence of the January effect has casted a doubt on the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). Nonetheless, anomalies seems to be declining or disappear in the recent years (Szakmary & Kiefer, 2004). This might be due to the fact that the market is