Lavish Analysis Of Weak Ties

* Close relationships can be formed between good friends, the closer the relationship becomes the more thoughts, feelings and hopes are shared

Depending on their nature, social relationships can influence behavioral health, psychological health, physical health, and mortality in a myriad of ways (Umberson and Montez, 2010). In general, healthy and high-quality social relationships are those characterized by support and mutual respect; whereas unhealthy and low-quality social relationships are those deemed toxic through stress and disrespect.

Living in a less populated town, I formulated close tied friends, in which my parents grew up with their parents. Since everyone knows each other and builds one’s security,

Stanley Eitzen decries the increasing loneliness that has come with advancement in technology and modernity. For instance, the writer asserts that the present day generation is socially inactive as compared to the past generations. Generally, the apparent isolation that people have found themselves in can be largely attributed to technology. Often times, people find themselves using their mobile phones and computers as opposed to engaging in personal face-to-face communications. In effect, this increases communication between individuals but largely reduces intimacy. Other than technology, the types of modern lifestyles that people have embraced have led to isolation, as people tend to live in social and racial settlements. The state of isolation, the author argues, has many disadvantages as it leaves individuals susceptible to unlawful organizations, such as terrorist groups and evil cults. I wholly conquer with these sentiments.

The book is structured around the Relationship Attachment Model, which was created by the author 20 years ago. It “portrays the different forces that create bonds in relationship” and it consists of “five fundamental dynamics, which are the depth to which you know, trust, rely on, have a commitment to and have sexual involvement with” (22). Each of these dynamics provides a unique contribution to the development of a relationship. According to the author, the key of building relationships (by using RAM) is to “keep a balance among the five relationship dynamics”. Whenever the dynamics shift, a person might experiences the feelings of being “unsafe in a relationship, hurt, mistrust and confusion” (24). This model was clearly based on some of the core relational communication theories such as Uncertainty Reduction (URT) and Social Penetration (SPT), as well as it follows Knapp’s staircase model in advising at how one should progress on the staircase and implications of going too fast.

These relationships and exchanges can be either tangible (physical resources) or intangible (resources than cannot quite be seen, heard or felt). In the book, The Corner, there are various examples of both tangible and intangible networking and reciprocity. In regards to intangible examples, there are many models of relationships that offer eachother support, respect and knowledge. Throughout the book we are introduced to various different people who have acquaintanceship, friendship or some other intimate relationship to eachother. An example of one of these relationships include Fran and her son, DeAndre. Although their relationship can sometimes seem inconsistent-she supports him when he is sent to juvenile detention as well as when he has appearances in court; whereas it wouldn’t always be expected of a drug-addicted mother with limited means of transportation and money to make such trips to be there for her son. In terms of a tangible reciprocity, although it is not the greatest living quarters-she provides him with a mattress to sleep on and a roof over his head. DeAndre, in turn, once in a while provides her with cigarettes, gifts for his younger brother when he’s had a successful night on the corner as well as drugs (although sometimes without his direct knowledge). Another example could be Rita, the house doctor that we are introduced as having a keen knowledge on helping junkies find their veins in desperate times when they cannot seem to do it for themselves any longer. It is revealed that occasionally, she is given free hits off other peoples’ goods in return for her services. These are also examples of both tangible (drugs) and intangible (Rita’s very limited medical knowledge that allows her to find peoples’ veins) networking and reciprocity. Another frequently cited example of strictly tangible

Granovetter highlights weak ties by stating that weak ties are best when it comes to the collection of information and resources that do not fit your normal or desired behaviors. For example, if you wish to gain insight into new job opportunities you would go to your weak ties. This is because as your weak ties, these people are not obligated to tell you things that will reaffirm or make you feel good about your current standing in the world because they are not invested in to your personal feelings, only the matter at hand. Meaning that they do not see any double meanings in your questions as a strong tie would. To clarify when asked as person that is slightly removed from you immediate agents of socialization, weak ties offer an opinion they draw on their own contacts that will have little or no relation to yours and therefore

and his or her acquaintances comprises a low-density network (one in which many of the possible relational lines are absent) whereas the set consisting of the same individual and his or her close friends will be densely knit (many of the possible lines are present). The overall social structural picture suggested by this argument can be seen by considering the situation of some arbitrarily selected individual-call him Ego. Ego will have a collection of close friends, most of whom are in touch with one another-a densely knit clump of social structure. Moreover, Ego will have a collection of acquaintances, few of whom know one another. Each of these acquaintances, however, is likely to have close friends in his own right and therefore to be enmeshed

O n faith in that assumption, we attempted to devise an instrument for assessing relationship closeness with the following

So the social structures, divisions and agencies which underpin society influence friendships. Analysis has identified many different types and formations of friendship of varying degrees of intimacy. Perhaps the key to understanding friendship is to understand that different friendships thrive in accordance with the different needs of each person, and that finding a person who or a friendship which meets personal expectations is where the relevance lies. A ‘symbolic interactionist’ sociological approach to future research would ascertain how that understanding between two people is reached. So, friendship exists within the social and economic context in which it was formed, and if this context alters, so does the nature of the friendship. The way in which humans manage and create friendships reacts to changes and evolves in order to sustain itself as part of the human condition. This is evidence of the value and necessity of human connection, be it friends or family, to the life experience. Studying friendship provides knowledge of social developments and changes. This is valuable in understanding human interaction and future policy within health and

Studies of mortality, which included social relationships as a metric, determined social relationships have a significant causal relationship to mortality. (Holt-Lunstad, Smith & Layton, 2010) More studies have been done on social relationships however; the mechanisms of how social relationships affect our health are still unclear. (2010) Relationships and their effect on health status continue to be an important area of research and analysis. Social relationships are a determinant which can be addressed at a community level. One key principle outlined by the Commission of European Communities report was not just looking at mortality rates, but also focusing on the quality of life during the

For years the formation of friendship has been evaluated through the eyes of psychology on how friendships actual form. There

The social support network of individuals, as they age, changes once they are either married or become geographically distant from their siblings. As suggested by White (2001), if individuals get married, have children, or establish a career, sibling relationships tend to become less central in terms of their social network. Although, among individuals who never

Human relationships are the foundation of human life, they strongly influence other individual’s behaviour (Bercheid et al., 2000). There are different types of relationships such as co workers, friendship, marriage which all involve a connection and therefore is an important characteristic of the formation of human relationships (Salisch 1996). The purpose of this essay is to explore research within human relationships and the relevant social psychological theories that have been linked with this conflicting topic. The theories that will be discussed throughout this essay will be the attribution theory, social learning theory, social exchange, attachment theory, evolutionary theory and the breakdown of relationships. This would initially

Its scope is very broad relationship; So often offset by the amount, always increasing, of mere acquaintances low quality of an intimate circle of real friends and confidants, which is impoverished because of this expansion. They are always eager to open the door and get to the next.