Law 421

959 Words4 Pages
Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker LAW/421 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Read the “Theory to Practice” section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text. Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the “Theory to Practice” section, and complete the following in your response: At the conclusion of the situation, BTT says that it's not serious about releasing Chou’s new technique game, Strat. Presuming BTT and Chou have got a deal, and BTT has breached the agreement by not releasing the game, discuss what solutions may or may not apply. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? By studying the situation, I don't believe the 2 sides concerned ever had a deal. In the situation,…show more content…
The truth that both sides were interacting by email didn't have an effect on my research into the case. E-mail is actually a type of electronic interaction, not a penned and signed agreement. While both sides might have conveyed their intention and conditions of the agreement, they never printed and inked any type of a written deal. This element makes all the variation with regards to enforceable agreements. What BTT and a Chou had wasn't a binding or enforceable agreement. What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? Under the UCC, the statue of scam relates to an agreement for the sales of items more than $500. The discussions between BTT and Chou were really more than $500; therefore the statues of scam would apply here. Under UCC rules, usually under common law agreements, the statue of scam applies whenever a deal can't be achieved in one year’s period. Under these types of conditions, the statute would apply. But, there's one factor necessary to satisfy this condition, and that's the signature of the side in the agreement. Although some legal courts have determined that an email can pass by like a signed writing in case the name of the side is included at the conclusion of the email, it's not clear in this case if Chou ever replied to the email declaring he agreed with the conditions, and left his name on paper too. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would

More about Law 421

Get Access