A NYPD officer was recently recorded telling a traffic violator it was Mayor de Blasio's fault the violator was getting a traffic violation summons. However, the fact of the matter remains--who committed the violation, you, or the Mayor?
If you received a summons under the Mayors, Vision Zero enforcement policy, taking it to court, pleading the policy is at fault, will not help your case. Wasn't it you that allegedly violated the law? Yes, so fight the violation on its merits, not blaming someone else for the cause, because, enforcement of the policy is irrelevant in court. You need an experienced lawyer to help fight your case.
Depending on what violation the summons was actually issued for, the particulars are what's contested. A lawyer determines whether the elements of the offense are proven against you, or if they were legally obtained. That's were getting advise from a good lawyer benefits you, don't go it alone. If you take it to court on your own, and expect to get off the hook because you blame the Mayor, think again.
…show more content…
Issuing summonses reduces the number of violations. It doesn't matter how many the police issue, what matters is what for and what they will prove. Every violation has something that is contestable. If pleading guilty or no contest, you lose the opportunity to either have the charge reduced or
The City filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) asserting that Hirst was not a City employee, a special employee or an individual providing services as outlined in a contract. The City’s JNOV motion was denied by the trial court and the Court of Appeal affirmed the ruling.
A person held by the municipality as having responsibility to carry out duties/powers was not authorized to do so
Department records show that plaintiff was observed trespassing in a NYCHA building without permission or authority. Arresting officer was PO Ortega.
I basely terminated my Pensacola Housing Voucher Program. The reason why, I left Pensacola, FL was to come back to my mother's house of resident in Tallahassee, FL to help her and myself for health issues. In addition, I did the terminated in Pensacola, FL before I came to Tallahassee. At my mother we did not see eye to eye, so I decide to move out. Therefore, I call Pensacola Housing, and they wise me that 10 days have passed by so that terminates me out of the Housing Voucher Program. However, I was wise; I have the rights to appropriate judicial proceedings. Furthermore an attorney is the only thing can get me back on the Housing Voucher Program if not I will have to get back on the two year waiting list again. By having an attorney sending
Again, permit this petition to serve as the second one against a Cleveland Police Officer whose name stated above. Meanwhile, your FINAL DISPOSITION OF INVESTIGATION #14-088, dated October 25, 2017on the same Police Officer received. Nothing has changed; the officer has doubled its efforts on the harassment, racial profiling, intimidation, and terrorizing. I asked why I deserve this treatment. Too long, this officer had violated my civil right, his recent
Odessa’s April 15 "Red for a Reason" campaign resulted in 65 citations in about three hours, most of them for either red light violations or railroad crossing violations. This shows that traffic violations, whether intentional or unintentional, are a problem in our area. Fortunately, there are several things you can do to avoid those small traffic violations, which may lead to a traffic citation.
Supervisor did a write-up and discriminated against me by calling me, "Little Beaner." Also he said, "I can fire you and hire someone prettier than you." Then he made me sign a blank write-up and threaten to fire me. He told me he was writing me up for parking violation which I was not notified in advance about the parking spot changes. I asked for a copy, but he refused. I filed a confidential letter of complaint with coworkers to HR and ethics point online on 2/26/2016, an investigation took place on 5/25/2016, which resulted in supervisor
On August 25th 2006, I and my ex-husband got into an argument on Fort Riley. It was at time that we were going thru a divorce and tension in our relation was real high. The argument started with my ex-husband over the car that we had together. The volume of the argument was intense and a bystander called the MP’s (Military Police). Once the MP’s arrive at the scene they defused the situation and took statements. I was arrest and took to the MP station that night. I received a citation and was release on my own recognizes. A couple of days later I received a court date in the mail and had to show up to the Fort Riley magistrate. When I went to court they found me guilty and put me on probation for a year. But while
The record shows that the Mayor did not order the removal of Mr. Roberts from the Council Chamber. The former City Manager did. The Mayor probably wishes she had responded more quickly to that action..
Here's a letter that dares not let Mayor Jack L Publice off the hook. It's all here: the compromises, the backstabbing, the attempts to hold annual private conferences in which flagitious pissants are invited to present their “research”. My hope is that the following text will delight the critical and offer food for thought to those contemplating his cankered calumnies. He sees no reason why he shouldn't galvanize the beggarly herd into enthusiastically supporting his misinformed squibs. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that Mayor Publice uses the word “hyperconscientiousness” without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
The differences between legal rules and other kinds of rules is that criminal law refers to the consequences associated with breaking them. As the substantive law meaning that it is the law of crimes, referring that Criminal law is the code conduct that all in the society need to follow the rule, and the prohibitions on murder, assault, and burglary. Meaning that if an individual violates or commits these crimes they are going to be treated as a criminal by punishing act from the state. Civil law is refers to procedural law to follow the rule of the state from someone that has committed a crime. Which it is divided into 5 categories, for example torts, property, contract, family, and juvenile law.
Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines.
Because of their petition and their statements of disapproval in court my request for rezoning was denied. I was furious, I don't think I had ever been that mad before in my life I couldn't even think straight, at home later that evening I receive a telephone called it was one of the white zoning commissioners after introducing himself he said look I know the only thing you need is a commercial address so you can get your business license my family own warehouses
A reoccurring conflict throughout this case assessment is the mayor’s ignorance to the policies that he is
they also encouraged and supported states to adopt and endorse tough laws, and started quite a few campaigns to build up public awareness about the concern. These laws are very important because drivers using their phones are dangerously impaired and because laws on inattentive and reckless driving are not tolerable enough to punish offenders. If you still don’t think that absent minded driving is a safety problem, please be inclined and take a moment to learn more about it. In cooperation, we can all help save