I returned Ms Dunlap call. She said wants to place a formal complaint against the CPS worker Miranda Larson because she illegally removed her children based on false accusations. She stated that Miranda, like the entire CW are doing criminal activities. She then asked me if I had talked to her attorney? What was my conversation about, What did I disclose to them? What did they told me about her? "Be honest" she said. I informed her that I do contact her attorney because in one her DHS 0170 form the Discrimination Complaint form, she provided us her attorney's phone number and my conversation was about how can we contact her. She said that we should not be talking to her attorney because she just fired her. Then she asked this worker to do …show more content…
She said "I know that you are not following me, you are incompetent like everybody else in the State of Oregon." Then she said "do not you understand? I want my kids back." She said that this worker does not want to help her because she knows that this office has the authority to order the judge return her kids back to her. She said that is going to law-sue the state workers including this worker because we are refusing to provide help to her. She asked "who pays your salary?" She said that this worker will be held accountable for not helping her. I asked her if she wants to talk about the three DHS-0170 forms that she sent us. She said yes because the CW worker, Miranda, is doing criminal actions against her and her sister. She said that Miranda also participate to remove her sister's kids, and this is a conflict of interest. I asked her if she received the letter that we sent her about the discrimination complaint, she said no. I informed her that we sent it to her mother's address, as she listed on her complaint form. She said that had already contacted a federal agent to investigate the criminal actions that the State of Oregon workers are doing, including this worker. She asked: "Don't you think that they are not watching you?" I asked her if she is threatening this worker, she said that is going to law-sue this worker for incompetent, and she is recording this conversation. I stated I do not authorize to record my conversation, so I
I do not understand why Felicia Hendrix, Probation Officer Manager would encourage an employee to write a letter making false statements, defaming my character of being a racist so that she can gain supervision of training Ms. Amibeth Grandy. This is a form of retaliation, hatred blatantly toward me. These allegations are extremely hurtful. I treat everyone the same regardless of their gender, race or nationality with professionalism and fairness.
May 13, 2016, I forgot my badge and I called her cell phone, and asked if she could open the door for me. Sherri came and open the door, asked me what is it I want to do after school. I was like I am not sure, Hennepin County will have an influx in jobs, due people retiring, Sherri’s comment to me was that there is no “room for you to grow” in MHP and that you should look for work elsewhere. And that she (Sherri) asked if I “lied in my job application” with regard to how much you were making before you came to MHP. Initally, I was on another call, Sherri was not aware my bluetooh was connected to my phone and the person on the call heard the entie converation.
The respondent is very unreasonable and combative. See EXHIBIT 4, text messages at 6:32 p.m. on 12/6/16, in a simply communication by respondent to petitioner and the children, she explains to petitioner "…you might have to get the kids…" the petitioner inquires as to "…why can't you…" pick up the kids, she begins with arguing by stating "Since your dad is making a big deal…". This is her common reaction to things. Our son Ryan replies with "No one is making a big deal" and "He was just asking a question". See EXHIBIT 5, a string of emails on 11/4/16, 11/17/16 and 11/30/16 to respondent's attorney asking for responses to requests for repsondent's Employee Plan Information, Joinder, Preliminary Declaration of Disclosures, proposed "Parenting
Iraida (PSA) received a call from Ileana who requested the HCSS to leave. As per Ileana, the HCSS had an attitude and they weren’t getting along. She requested the HCSS to leave her at her MD office and she’d be taken home by transportation. Ileana alleged the HCSS was talking badly about her to the MD office staff (HCSS denies this). Ileana was informed that we wouldn’t be able to leave her alone. SC was informed of situation and attempted to speak to Ileana over the phone. Ileana couldn’t speak since she was being seen by the MD. Aide was able to redirect Ileana and calm her down. She allowed the HCSS to accompany her back home. HCSS is refusing to return to the case.
CPSW did a home visit to meet with Ms. Berner and to discuss about her safety plan since the children are moving with her on10/29/16 from the foster provider. Ms. Berner was late for her appointment and CPSW waited a 40 minutes for Ms. Berner. Ms. Berner apologized for being late. CPSW explained Ms. About safety plan. Ms. Berner understood and she signed them. Ms. Berner stated that she will be doing a house arrest for two weeks and the recommendation of her criminal court is to obey law and continue taking her medication on time and seeing her therapist. Also, cooperating with her PO and CPSW. CPSW consulted with the supervisor and she has approved both children to move back with Ms. Berner. Goal 1-2
She mentioned that her lawyer told her that he was told by DHS worker that they have the intent to denied her application. As of today, nobody has called her.
She totally disagreed, and she stated that her attorney has told her that she knows other children with the same condition of Evan that is receiving more services. She ended the conversation that is going to request her attorney to lawsuit the DHS base on negligence the provide the right service, as the judge ordered. I informed her that based on the Disposition Judgement of the Circuit Linn County Co, dated on 04/08/16, it is mentioned that the DHS has made diligent efforts to prevent or
I called the constituent, she said that she is the paternal GM to Alicia Buck. She wanted to complain about CW Midtown Caseworker Eric and she also asked who to contact to change CW policy because the CW caseworker are overwhelmed with too many cases that they are assigned and they cannot do a better job because their high caseload. I asked her to be more specific please. She said that she was informed that Eric cannot return her call because he has 25 other cases, so believes he got too many cases.
She wanted to file a formal complaint against a CW case worker who is her son's CW caseworker. The constituent stated that the caseworker does everything that the mother of the child (who is her grandson) and she believes that the CW caseworker is violating her and her son's civil rights. Her son's attorney had told her if her son wants to have her child back, they needs to gain the CW caseworker and make the CW caseworker her best friend.
I informed her that I am going to mail her the Customer Service/Privacy Complaint or Report of Discrimination for and will staff with my co-worker her
217 at 9:15 AM this worker went for a child parent worker visit to see Chad McAdams in Jacksonville correctional center. When checking into the visiting room with a hug and kiss. Chad held and fed Sophia. Had bounced up and down his knee and played walk Sophia. Chad told this worker that Chad asked for a extension on the court hearing due to surgery on my shoulder. Chad will be having surgery within the next two weeks on his shoulder and will be inside of a sling with no movement allowed. This worker told my child that Christina Caroway his ex-wife I lost her job due to refusing to drug drop. Chad stated that he is going to have a no stocking order placed on Christina once he is released from prison. Chad was appropriate with Sophia and cater
Due to the tardiness, I was not able to return her calls until today, Monday. She mentioned that still did not hear about her complaint about her civil rights has been violated by OAAPI investigators when they disclosed her confidential information to the CLCM Investigator, Karen Johnson, who is now retaliating against her because had opened a new investigation.
I also gave her the Credit Report Agencies phone number to report a potential identity theft, she did not understand why she needed to call them, she was most interested to know if Melissa will be held accountable for accessing her information, Jennifer became upset saying this worker does not understand the reason of her call. After few minutes she restated the reason of her call, I informed her that if her allegation happened to be true, she also needs to protect her and her children of any other potential risks, including financial
Leah put SC on hold for 6 ½ minutes. When she returned to the line Leah informed SC that Marie is not an employee of the agency at this time. She said that Marie completed an application sometime last week but when they tried to verify the information on the application her name did not match (on the application she is listed as Maria and on her SS-ID / DL she is listed as Marie). However no one informed Marie of this matter. Leah informed SC that the there is an apportioned contact person by the name of Quine Dun that SC contact directly relating to any of the above issue and/or going
I informed her that we at the GAO do not have authority to overturn judge's decision, however, we can have access to Chritian DHS records but we are not allowed to share with her any specific information unless she gets a ROI. Then she said her son got a new CW caseworker and she hopes it will work better.