The use of force should be allowed for law enforcement officials. On the news you hear about problems with the use of force in law enforcement, but you never hear the benefits about it do you? The reason why you never see any good things about the use of force is because people think it’s a racial thing, or it’s an excessive way to deal with people. The use of force is actually used as a defense tactic, people also assume officers are too rough, and it also prevents the suspect from harming the officer
Thesis: Videotaping of Law enforcement should be allowed by civilians since it is a constitutional right of the people. Police can be videotaped while working in the public as long as specific conditions are met. Implementing new video technology both on the officer directly and in law enforcement departments, will help to reduce tax payer money for wrongful prosecution and ensure civilian and law enforcements safety. Videotaping is, indeed, specified and protected by the first amendment to our constitution
immigration increased. The policy from the federal government has been shifted from openness to increase enforcement to patrol the border and pass more and more laws restricting legal migration in to the country. Since Texas has the longest border with Mexico, enforcing the rules has been tough. In response to the enforcement gap the state has plug the enforcement gap by using local and state enforcement agency to assist the federal government, while at the same time treating the illegal immigrant already
Many states have laws about distracted driving such as no handheld devices are allowed to be used, bus drivers are not allowed to use cell phones while driving, while other states do allow cell phone use. Some states allow “all drivers (regardless of residency) must use hands-free devices, except for emergencies and on-duty emergency and police personnel,” in D.C. (Weir). The difference in opinion in the different states because of their different views on cellular use while driving. According to
The Patriot act positives out weigh the negatives. The positives are law enforcement being able to use surveillance that investigators used to investigate organized crime and drug traffickers. The Federal Bureau of
United States Should illegal immigrants be allowed to get in for free? Should they be allowed to enter while others spend years following the rules in order to gain their legal entry? In today’s society, the people of the United States are being taken advantage by the illegal immigrants. There are many examples in the news today demonstrating illegal immigrants shouldn’t be allowed to cross the border like the economic deficit, crime or the protection of our country. Illegal immigrants should not be allowed
Should Police Officers be required to where Body Cameras Ken Davis BUSI600 Section # BO5 June 21, 2015 Abstract The pedigree of this literary review will outline some of the dimensions and elements that provide empirical research by reliable researchers using reliable methods. The purpose of this paper is threefold: The first purpose is to review the communication and organizational literature on authority in order to illustrate how police brutality assist and continues to evolve
First to define what forfeiture is and what are the purposes behind it; basically it is where local, federal, or state law enforcement will end up seizing property in the event where they feel there is considerable amount of suspicion that is connected to a crime that law enforcement feels they are guilty regardless of whether they have been convicted of the crime said law enforcement feels they are guilty of. Civil Asset forfeiture can have its positives and its negatives, these can work to the advantage
the United States. Terrorism, commercial use, and privacy all feed into the problem. The fears of American people should be the number one issue in government, and those issues should be resolved. Since drones are fueling the fire to the problem then it is absolutely necessary that we solve the issue. To solve the problem of crooked drones being used by both citizens and law enforcement, new safety and privacy regulations must be set in place to protect the civilians of America from harm and espionage
PREPARATION OUTLINE FOR INFORMATIVE SPEECH #3 Purpose Statement: To persuade my audience that people who own firearms should have to register their firearms with law enforcement. Thesis Statement: People who own firearms are generally responsible and should have nothing to hide when it comes to firearm safety. They should register their firearms with the police department in order to help keep society safe. Attention Getter: Would you feel safer if every gun owner was required to register their