Law M1

In the U.S. judicial system, a defendant found guilty in a trial court can normally appeal to a higher federal court. These federal courts, or appellate courts, review decisions made by trial courts (Neubauer, 2010). Appellate courts can be on the federal and state level, but do not hold trials or hear new evidence. These courts consist of a judge, or a lawyer, or a group of either one, who read the transcript of the trial and whether the previous decision correctly or incorrectly followed the law (Neubauer, 2010). Similar to trial courts, the federal government and most states have made two different types of appellate courts: intermediate, which hear all cases, and supreme courts, which can pick and choose the cases heard (Neubauer, 2010). Even though there are many different types of courts within the judicial system of the United States, the role of the judge stays constant throughout the majority of branches.

Lay people are people who don’t get paid and who are not qualified; they are volunteer’s, lay people in the law are the magistrate and the jury and I will be explaining their role and the advantages and disadvantages of having lay people get involved with the legal system.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you discuss the roles of law and courts in today’s business environment.

Pass 5- Outline the role of judges and lawyers in civil and criminal cases and Merit 1- compare and contrast the role and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts.

In this section I am going to evaluate the effectiveness of Lay people within the English Legal System.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you discuss the roles of law and courts in today’s business environment.

Throughout this section of my assignment I will evaluate the effectiveness of Lay people within the courts.

The judge is the referee between the Crown and the defence who aim to prove their side of the story. The judge ensures both the prosecution and the defence meet the rules of evidence. Consequently, he decides whether the evidence provided

Solicitors and barristers are both known as lawyers this term “lawyer” is used to describe anyone who is a qualified legal practitioner. One of the main differences is the job role a solicitor is a legal expert who provides expert legal advice and they come into more contact with their clients who could be people, groups or businesses. Whereas a Barrister represents the individual people and the organisation within the courts, they can also be distinguished from a solicitor because they wear a wig and a gown in the court. One thing they both have in common is that they both can give legal advice to their clients. On a day to day basis a solicitor will deal with the majority of the paperwork for example, writing documents, contracts and letter this is all related to their clients .and take specific instructions from their clients, depending on where they are specialist in they will be able to give useful advice on the legal action. Whilst a barrister would mainly focus on advocacy which is to represent their clients in court, they are normally hired by a solicitors and take instructions from there. There main role is to represent their client cases in a persuasive representation in order to get the best outcome for their client. The Legal services act 1990

There are two kinds of court in this country. The two courts are state and federal. In this essay I️ will be briefing you on the things that they have in common and the things they don’t have in common such as behavior in the court and the way they handle the state court room.

Explain the roles of lay people and lawyers in a criminal case Lay magistrates The integration of lay people into the legal system in England has been very successful. Firstly, because it involves people with local knowledge. Secondly the magistrates that are used come from a wide range of careers not just a legal background which gives them a more open mind also it is less expensive as a process. To become one, you must me between the ages of 18 and 65 years of age and live locally to the area that the courts cover.

People In The Legal Profession. P2 part 1: Magistrates. Introduction In this task, i will be explaining what magistrates are, their roles and powers, how they are appointed and the training they through and also who is not eligible to be a magistrate. What are magistrates Magistrates are unpaid, trained members of the local community (people within a 15 mile radius), who work part time (26 and a half days a year) and deal with less serious criminal cases, such as: theft, criminal damage, public disorder,and motoring offences.

This essay will discuss the role of the magistrate and jury in the English and Welsh legal decision-making process. It will assess both the advantages and disadvantages of both mechanisms and give an opinion on the contribution they make in the process.

In England and Wales lay magistrates are delegated by the Lord Chancellor on the part of the monarch and effectively upon the counsel of local advisory committees. They are crossed examined by local government, labor unions, chambers

Explain and critically consider the use of lay magistrates in the legal system of England and Wales.