Leadership Comparison Essay

Northouse discusses leadership and management in depth, explaining the differences, similarities, and the theories behind each. The manager and leader roles are intertwined and contain many similar qualities such as working with others, influence, and accomplishing goals effectively and efficiently (Northouse, p. ). On another note, there are established differences between the two as explained by Northouse.

In accordance to an adaptation from The Wall Street Journal Guide to Management by Alan Murray, published by Harper Business, although leadership and management must function collectively, they are not identical, however they are unavoidably connected and corresponding; any attempt to disconnect the two is liable to initiate more complications than it resolves. Nevertheless, considerable effort has been consumed outlining the dissimilarities. The manager’s responsibility is to strategize and coordinate, whereas the leader’s responsibility is to encourage and motivate. (Murray, A., 2009)

To fully explain the relationship between Leadership and Management we need to appreciate that the two go hand in hand, they are by no means the same thing but they complement each other when driving any team to perform and exceed targets within a business. The manager’s job is very task-focused. They often have to follow company

In 1978, J.M. Burns defined successful leaders as being transformational rather than transactional. Burns described the transformational leader as having recognized the organization as a complex system in a chaotic environment. The leader has also responded to complexity by being aware of change. The transformational leader has established a shared vision and inspired the organization to learn and evolve in response to change. Transformational leaders have driven radical change, trading short-term stability for long-term survival. In 2007, Kouzes and Posner refined Burn’s work by breaking down the transformational leader’s

My daily work has transitioned to this way of practice. The concept of school turn around being a case by case needs assessment and actually asking the schools what they need assistance in, has not always been a practice. It was more of pointing a finger, saying everything that was wrong and then going back to see if they fixed it or not to then give them another laundry list of things that they needed to fix. We are able to, as “the State”, ask how we can best be used to roll up our sleeves and become a part of the work that needs to get done in order for us to effect change. It is well received by schools that have had a sour taste left in their mouths from past interactions with someone from our team.

In general, we are familiar with the quote managers do things right while leaders do the right things. In essence, the analytical versus the holistic approach of leadership addresses these two separate and distinct functions within an organization. For instance, a manager focuses on the daily operations of an organization with an emphasis on team delivery, budgeting, and supervising the employees. Contrarily, leaders within an organization focus their time on improvements and innovation. In particular, leaders can perform this function since they are not culpable for routine tasks and mired in the minutia. As a result, there is a misnomer that managers are leaders and leaders remain managers, but they are not exclusive. Therefore, being a manager and a leader requires different abilities and dispositions.

Is every good manager a good leader? Is every leader a good manager? Leadership and management are often used in similar perspectives, yet they do not share the same meaning. Leaders are exactly what the name says - they lead team members to success. Managers, like leaders, have the meaning referenced in the name. Managers manage over employees, striving for success. The two titles can be used simultaneously with one person, but this is a rare occurrence.

When we reflect on what a leader and manager is, we most often use the same connotation. Nonetheless the meaning is different. At the same time, they differ in a number of respects though they are necessary abilities, talents and skills that go hand in hand. Management is the style used where someone is accountable for giving directions and controlling the work and staff of an organization or business, or of a department within the organization. Management is a style where the subordinates do as they are told. Leadership is the style where someone has the ability or charisma to whom which people will follow, somebody who guides or directs

Leadership and Management are two notions that are often used interchangeably. However, these words actually describe two different concepts. For this paper, I am going to try to discuss these differences and explain why both terms are thought to be similar.

Leadership and Management sound like the same this to the layman. But there are distinct differences and approaches that reap separate results. John P. Kotter wrote an analysis on the comparison between the Manager and the Leader. According to Kotter, management is more organizational centric and focuses on the preparation for complexity. Being able to create specializations within companies, protocols, and a number of procedures reduces discussions decisions on issues after the fact. If a there is a particular concern the dedicated department can source their efforts toward the project, and the company can continue to operate under a normal climate. Leaders focus on aligning subordinates with the vision, actualizing the function of the

In corporate America the term used to describe a person in a position of power is “Manager”. A leader can be a manager, but a manager is not necessarily a leader. Leaders motivate, challenge, and influence others to achieve goals. Great leaders have the necessary skills and attributes which allow them to connect with the team and organization. Being a leader is not the same as managing an organization. Leader’s posses the interpersonal skills needed to influence others to achieve a goal willingly. Leading is a major part of a manager’s job. Leaders do not need to be a manager to lead people, but managers must know how to lead as well as manage.

Leadership and management must go hand in hand. They are not the same thing. But they are necessarily linked, and complementary. Any effort to separate the two is likely to cause more problems than it solves. A manager’s role characterize a more controlled, structured, rule oriented, analytical and orderly sequenced. Whereas, the role of a leader indicates a more visionary, experimental, impassioned, unstructured and flexible side. Thus, it can be said that leaders and managers are totally different as they behave the opposite externally and also think the opposite internally. The difference is also witness in the way the two, treat people and the way they spontaneously react to issues concerning their organizations. This can be explained by the difference in the way of work and organization between the leaders and the managers in relation to their importance in the organizations they head thus the worthiness of their time. This results to those below them to develop different focuses and also limits them in totally different ways. Such differences lead to varied cultures on the organizations and different reactions from the ones being led. Small business will operate more efficiently with managers who also serve as leaders .Workers need their managers not just to assign tasks but to define purpose. Managers must organize workers, to nurture skills, develop the talents of workers

Managers and leaders are very similar as they both lead staff teams by motivation but they do this in different ways. Managers have more authority with the team and plan, organise and co-ordinate their team to most productivity. A leader has “the ability of a superior to influence the behaviour of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action.” (Barnard 1938). Leaders lead by example, working well within a team providing

The leader innovates where a manager directs; a manager sustains what has already been created. Leadership is not what you do-it’s what others do in response to you, retaining control over people by aiding in the development their own abilities and bringing out their talents (Jaynes, 2015). Mangers have underlings while Leaders have followers; leaders do not have underlings. To lead is to have follower, following is a chosen pursuit. There can and are superior and terrible leaders, and there can and are be superior and terrible managers. Comparing how the two different positions may be related. A definition is needed to assist leaders and manager to comprehend how to accomplish excellence in doing what they have to do. Due to the fact that many people are both a leader and a manager it is often times quite difficult to distinguish between the two. Managers are controllers of systems, resources; all the while leading teams to achieve goals. Referring to each ability’s to motivate, influence and contribute to success is the role of a leader. Leaders are people who do the right thing; managers are people who do things right. – Professor Warren G. Bennis (Jaynes, 2015)

Taking BUAD309 has enabled me to become both an effective manager and leader by introducing me to terms and concepts that I can apply to my life as I take on these roles. The tools and concepts that were discussed in class will serve as assets to me, as I lead or manage an organization. I have learned to distinguish between managers and leaders, in that they are different by their definitions and the tasks that they complete. Both managers and leaders play important roles in organizations and there is overlap between the roles, however there are some distinguishing factors between the two titles. I have learned that a manager is responsible for the day-to-day tasks of an organization, in addition to creating detailed plans, and creating efficient organizational structures that help the organization as a whole run efficiently. A manager