Leadership Differences Between Leadership And Autocratic Leadership

1597 Words7 Pages
Leadership Comparison Two leadership styles on the opposite ends of the spectrum from one another are autocratic and participative. Both can be useful depending on the setting and what is required. Autocratic leaders make decisions without using team members, even if it would be useful (mindtools.com, n.d.). When a decision needs to be made very quickly, when there is not a need for additional input, or when a team agreement is not needed, this type of leadership can work (mindtools.com, n.d.). However, autocratic leadership can be demoralizing in the workplace and can lead to a high turnover rate as well as abseentism (mindtools.com, n.d.). An example of an autocratic leader/organization would be Martha Stewart and her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Participative leadership on the other hand, looks to involve other people in the decision-making process, including peers, superiors, and even subordinates (changingminds.org, n.d.). How much input is involved is up to the manager, which can vary to anything from the leader selling the idea to her members or simply stating what the objective is and then leave it up to the team to figure out how to reach that objective (changingminds.org, n.d.). This style of leadership can be very beneficial to an organization. Employees are normally committed, less competitive and more collaborative working towards goals, and more heads are better than one (changingminds.org, n.d.). An example of a participative
Open Document