Leadership Is The Most Important Factor That Drives The Existence Of A Learning Institution?

Leadership in an organization often plays a critical role, and is frequently, though not always, one of the major drivers of the success or failure of a company. (Bass, 1990) Effective leadership helps a company through times of peril and brings a future of brightness. It makes a corporation successful. However, what is leadership? According to Kouzes and Posner, it is the art of mobilizing others to want to struggle for shared aspirations. (1995, p.30) Leaders set a clear direction for us; they help us realize what is ahead; they support us to achieve and win; they encourage and inspire us when we feel depressed. Without leadership, an organization will degenerate into chaos and unstructured because people view things in different ways.

Leadership is a facet of management. It is just one of the many assets a successful manager must possess. The main aim of a manager is to maximize the output of the organization through administrative implementation. To achieve this managers must undertake the four functions of management: planning, organization, leading and controlling. In some cases leadership is just one important component of the leading function. Predpall (1994) said, "Leaders must let vision, strategies, goals, and values be the guide-post for action and behavior rather than attempting to control others". In some circumstances, leadership is not required. For example, self-motivated groups may not require a single leader and may find leaders dominating. The fact that a leader is not always required proves that leadership is just an asset and is not essential.

As one leads with integrity, fairness and in an ethical manner, they lead by modeling those values and beliefs that belong in an educational setting. They show concern and care personally for the students, staff and communities learning, behaviors, and lives. Leaders promote a culture of openness and trust. They model appropriate behavior and skills to improve learning and engage others to share in this process through collaboration.

The leaders and managers are the pillars of any educational setting on which the success and failure of the setting depend. Before discussing the leadership and

The theme of leadership is relevant today for many areas of life. After consulting the dictionary, one can construe the leadership as an inner force that manifests in the ability to influence and to control others. A person possesses this quality when he/she can guide masses and move them to the goal, take the consequences and realize the responsibility for himself/herself and others. Shakespeare once remarked that to be a good leader, first of all, one should serve faithfully and loyally. Otherwise, leadership is a destructive force: either you succeed, or it destroys you. “Macbeth” and “Lord of The Flies’ are epitomes of both leadership patterns and worth.

Similar to other leadership settings, educational leadership has a reliance on individual traits such as respect, trustworthiness, and fairness. Similarly, skills are essential since they determine the effectiveness of headship. Cooperation of staff members requires leaders to have strong awareness and understanding of their complex organizational environment. Concurrently, choice of management style is essential while focusing on maximum effectiveness of educational leadership. Lastly, as postulated, educational leadership is a great influencer towards students

He describes his leadership, and management roles as being democratic and relational. He recognizes that for any significant amount of success to be attainable, especially in a school setup like this one, it is imperative that all the individuals charged with various responsibilities get to do them mostly out of their own volition. This may only be possible to attain if the directives they use to go about the day to day activities at the school

Many educational facilities recognise the value of effective leadership in a scholastic environment, and subsequently adopt and endorse a range of theories as an effective means of providing additional support and influence for both staff and students, and further to work towards achieving common goals (Reeves, 2006). A comprehensive leadership program is a critical part of any educational structure, where the motivation, inspiration and influence of staff are the central focus (Reeves, 2006). It is developed with support from both the community and school administrators, with the ideals of implementing processes that will result in the educational benefits of students on many levels. Successful school leaders possess a range of personal,

Leadership is a process of influencing activities of a particular group of people with the aim of attaining certain stipulated goals. In defining leadership there is need to consider a particular group, the common goals and the duties that are allocated to specific members of the group depending on their abilities (Fiedler 1976). Leadership therefore cannot successfully occur unless members of the group are given different considerations in terms of personality, traits and responsibilities. In considering leadership, it is important to look at the leader, the group or organization they are leading, the members as individuals and the situation; these are

2. There's many different leaders scattered around the school, although most are teachers. Student leaders aren't uncommon, but much harder to find as teachers are in charge of the class and are expected to be viewed as the authority figure. That being said, most teachers use authoritarian leadership when teaching because it's the easiest to maintain throughout a long period of time, a semester for example, because of the clear-cut simplicity of it. If you do something well in class, you get a reward. If you act up or do something badly, then there's a negative consequence (For example, some teachers give lower grades, others want you to do push-ups.) Not to be rude, but I view authoritarian leadership as if they're training dogs. In a teacher's

There has been vast amounts of research done on the topic of leadership, and yet despite this it continues to be ‘‘riddled with paradoxes, inconsistencies, and contradictions’’

Some styles of leadership are becoming more prevalent, while other are dormant. “Leadership models in education are subject to the same faddism that is apparent in other areas of education. Today’s favorite brand is soon replaced by another” (Hallinger, 2003, p. 333). With an abundance of leadership styles, teachers and administrators may have a difference of opinion when it comes to their perceptions of leadership in their school. Leaders must find what works best in their own situation.

In the past people believed that leaders are born not made. Now the definition of leadership has been changed because now we believe that leaders can be made through education. Leadership plays important part in every field and organization to achieve higher goal. According to Kelly, “leadership is a process of influence in which the leader influences others toward goal achievement” (Kelly & Crawford, 2013, p. 168). Nowadays there are many leadership theories and have different perspective and suggestion. I have chosen two theories to discuss in this paper that is Autocratic leadership theory the Transformational leadership theory. Both theories are total contradictory with each other because both have a different perspective.

What defines leadership? There are a number of definitions of the meaning of leadership including but not limited to the theories of leadership and how leadership should work. In my opinion, every individual has different ways of confronting situations and there is not one leadership style or theory that will be flawless for any given situation. However, to be a successful educational leader, it is crucial to understand and be familiar with the various theories and styles of leadership as well as our personal tendencies to nurture a personal leadership style. Despite the method used to confront a situation, it’s the outcome of success that will determine which leadership style or theory should be used. The following

The relation between leadership and management has for a longtime influenced how organizations are perceived. It has also contributed to maintain some type of confusion in education and within the organization itself.