Leadership Model That Deals With Team Performance Outcomes

In recognition on how to be an effective leader, past researches in leadership has discovered that leadership is a critical aspect to an organization and it will continue to evolve, in line with the development of human-to-human relationships (Daft & Pirola-Merlo 2009, p. 4, Rast et al. 2012 p. 646). Yet, to be a leader, there are at least six key factors that must be met by a person, namely: followers, influence, intention, personal responsibility and integrity, shared purpose and change (Daft & Pirola-Merlo 2009, p. 5). However, even if someone has

Leadership is difficult to define. Leadership is a concept that probably carries many different reactions with many different kinds of people. However, we all feel we know good leadership when we see it, and we can often tell when good leadership is missing by the way a team or organization struggles without it. Ask yourself, Are you willing to do absolutely anything for the common good for your employer, your teammate, your family, your friend?

The Groups Dynamics of a team can be effected if the category of leadership is not in place. Leadership means “the activity of leading a group of people or an organization or the ability to do this.” In order to be a good leader you must have a strong value that you can give to your team. A good leader must have strong values to pass on to their team. At the top of the teams hierarchy is a leader, so that the leader can put input towards everything the team does, so that the team would be successful because the leader controls and guides the team.

Classical organisational theorist defined leadership in terms of achieving a group’s objectives R.C Davies (1942) referred to leadership as “the principle dynamic forces that motivates and coordinates the organisation in the accomplishment of its objectives.” Similarly, Urwick (1953) stated that the leader is “the personification of common purpose not only to all who work under taking, but to everyone outside it.” K. Davies (1962) defined leadership as “the human factor which binds a group together and motivates it towards goals.” Cattell (1951) took the extreme position that leadership is whatever or whoever contributes to the group’s performance. To measure each members Leadership, Cattell noted, removed him or her from the group, one at a time, and observe what happens to the group’s performance. Calder (1977) and Pfeffer (1977) “stated that leadership is mainly influence and is even attributed to participants after the fact.

At the present time, leadership, especially effective leadership plays an increasingly significant role in the organization, which can be regarded as the process of affecting activities of an organized group in its efforts forward target setting and target achievement (Daft, 2011). From this perspective, organizations in every walk of life are in pursuit of effective leadership in order to ensure the competitive advantage (Schriesheim et al., 1999). Although there is no unique definition about effective leadership, precisely, in light of Lussier & Achua (2007), there are two basic requirement on effective leadership: for one thing, effective leadership will ensure that reach the target of the group can be reached effectively; for another, leadership can impose positive influence on the group members, and motivate them to Maximum their potentials.

Effective leadership, commonly regarded as both a learned skill and innate ability, is an essential characteristic of successful organizations (Northouse, 2016). Great leaders are said to define purpose, create a vision for the future, set high ethical standards, and guide their organizations through many circumstances and into new directions (Morrill, 2007; Parris & Peachey, 2012). Leadership is also described as complex – it can mean different things to different people. Given there is no standard approach to leadership, scholars focus on the process of leadership as opposed to the definition (Northouse, 2016). As a process, leadership is not simply possessing formal authority or characteristic traits and personal attributes. Quite the reverse, leadership is mostly a relationship – engagement and interactive exchange – between leaders and followers (Morrill, 2007; Northouse, 2016). According to Parris and Peachey (2012), the impact of effective leadership on economic, political, and organization success makes leadership one of the most comprehensively researched processes of human behavior. Therefore, understanding the behaviors of leaders is critical to understanding individual and organizational success.

Leadership is an important aspect of management sciences. Over the past century, many theories have been developed to provide managers with the tools required to effectively lead their subordinates. From a simplistic theory cataloguing individual traits and characteristics, leadership has become a complex science shaped by many forces (ex: behavioural sciences, organizational culture, strategic management trends etc.) (Avolio, Walumba and Weber, 2009).

To define leadership as a process, it can mean that leadership may not be a trait or characteristic that resides in a leader, but rather it is more of a transactional event that occurs between the leader and the followers. This process affects both the leader and the followers. It does also say that leadership is not a linear one-way process but involves the whole team to interact with the leader and work together as one. In addition, some researchers define leadership in terms of power. The power relationship that exists between the leader and followers. From this point of view, it’s said that leaders have the power to captivate and wield an effect to change others. It is a transformational process that makes followers to accomplish more than what is expected. Finally, other scholars believe that leadership could be skill motivated or seen from a skill perspective. This can be defined on how followers can be using the capabilities (knowledge and skills) from the leader to make effective leadership.

In order for a task leader to be an effective team leader, there are many facets of leadership to be considered. Certain leadership styles have been proven to be a major factor in producing an effective and successful organization. Prosperous organizations demand effective leaders because they are able to modify their leadership styles to suit any task put before them. However, the ability to be consistent with how they influence the behavior of the team proves to be one of the most important facets of maintaining an effective organization. Leadership style represents a leader’s convictions, experience and temperament in practice.

Leadership is a technique to bring different individuals together to form a team by maximizing their potential in order to accomplish a common goal. By knowing and understanding the various theories of organizational leadership can aid individuals in expanding and developing their abilities within leadership. Furthermore, leaders practice different leadership styles and theories contingent upon the circumstances and necessities required to successfully achieve objectives. As an example, some leaders may use the transformational theory as a method to maintain communication among workers to motivate them to get the job done. Leaders apply transactional theory as a way to provide rewards or punishment according to performance to motivate followers (Voon, Lo, Ngui & Ayob, 2011). The future of an organization rest on its leadership’s capability to lead and it is important that leaders use each theory for organizational leadership depending on the current condition to efficiently inspire and foster individuals to achieve each goal that is set before them.

Leadership has been defined as an ability that a personal has to cause outstanding performance from others by getting followers, leading and motivating them (Tracy, 2014, p. 2-3). Leadership is not just management or authority, it also refer to social influence and relationships with followers, such as trust between leader and follower, and leader’s personality traits, more communication with followers, and treating each other honestly (Comstock, 2015). Because comparing with management, leadership can make different in different industry and can make the goal be achieved effectively, leadership effectiveness has been paid attention

The earliest study of leadership, Galton’s (1869) Hereditary Genius underlined a founding concept that evolved into most prevalent ideas about leadership through to the present. Leadership is seen to be distinguished as simply a trait found in extraordinary individuals. Known as the great man theory, the formation of leadership has developed into the study of leadership characteristics, to be supplanted by the theories I will be discussing in my essay. It is necessary to firstly define the term leadership before discussing it. Rost (1993) revealed a total of 221 differing definitions of leadership. Some being unambiguous, whilst others were more broad in their conceptions. Bass (2008) argued that it is trivial to pursue a singular definition of leadership. (Yukl, 2010) simply defines it as “the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how to do it, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplishing shared objectives.” This makes leadership a separate ideology to management, which is a process of organisation, planning and controlling resources to reach certain goals set by the higher ups in the organisation. What is a high performing team? The centre for organisational design describes it as “a group of people with harmonising talents and skills in their specific roles, united under one purpose, who consistently show commitment and high levels of motivation, innovation and collaboration, that

Leadership is individual who help in creating and achieving shared goals. Some compel other drive from the groups. Leadership is social affiliation of three constituent leaders, followers and the context (Nye, 2010). Leadership is the ability to move a group towards a common goal. Leadership is an activity, by which one can stimulate others to work in order to achieve a given goal (Val & Kemp, 2013). Leadership styles can be generally divided into positive, negative and neutral. Negative style has the strongest effect on the creativity, motivation, and inspiration of the employee’s. Neutral behavior relates to lack of regular information. Leaders help followers to establish goals and guide them toward achievement of goals thereby allowing them to be effective (CL, 2013). I argue that effective leaders have different set of skills in their armor, which they use according to the demand of the circumstances for achieving the targets. Moreover, it depends upon the leader’s gender, ethnicity, and power for being effective. In the process of formation of groups and teams leader’s gender composition has important meaning for the group members. This usually affect in the behaviors and performance of the group. Emotional intelligence of the leaders signifies about the accomplishment of the results. Successful leaders always take the risks. They are always prepared for the criticism.

Leadership is the act of motivating and guiding; facilitating it can gain the help and support of a group in order to achieve a particular objective. Dr. Kumar at the University of Delhi generalized a rather good definition, “leadership is a dynamic process in which an individual behaves in a certain manner, thereby influencing others to follow” (9). Leaders have the means to drive any willing organization and make it successful. Willing is included because leadership seeks to eliminate unease and help the group visualize objectives and begin working fluently towards that initiative. Good leadership can envision and empower a group focusing it to overcome and prosper. Good guidance can turn underachievers into all-stars or take the misdirected group of all-stars and focus them into a team of superstars. They strive to eliminate the value of titles and work to include everyone, promoting the entire group to higher levels.

All group members share the same information and they are allow to speak their ideas or opinions before the leader make the final decision. This leadership styles could create higher productivity outcome and also provide opportunity to enhance the growth of follower ability over time.