Leadership Practices in The Post-Bureaucratic Era

An important aspect of this is the relationship between learning, knowledge management and innovation, and, by examining the views of a number of writers who place leadership within a system or ecological perspective, the clear relevance of leadership to sustainable development practice will be outlined. Finally, by identifying a number of traits and characteristics frequently associated with leaders and leadership (Blewitt, J., 2015).

Autocratic, otherwise known as Authoritarian, leadership styles assume that employees are externally motivated and incapable of making external decisions. Therefore, orders are given out specifically with clear expectations and deadlines. In this leadership style the leader has the final say in the project (Finkleman, 2012). Democratic Leaders are less productive then authoritarian leaders; however, they tend to have the most quality. This is a result of the leaders giving guidance as well as participating in the project. Participants are encouraged to grow, be engaged, and tend to feel like valuable members of the team (Cherry, 2015). Laissez- faire leaders take very hands off approach to the project. Participants are less motivated and less productive then the previous two. The leader assumes that the participants are internally motivated by recognition, achievement, and increased responsibility. It is assumed that participants are self regulating and autonomous (Finklman, 2012). This leadership style is effective in environments where participants are highly skilled and specialized. Otherwise, the group lacks direction and tends to blame each other for mistakes; while refusing to take personal responsibility (Cherry, 2012). The results of my quiz indicated that I take a predominately Laissez- Faire approach to leadership is accurate. This lines up with my approach towards life; I tend

In this essay, I am going to discuss how practices of leadership contribute to managing communication in the post bureaucratic era. This essay shall discuss the effectiveness of leadership approaches in the post bureaucratic era in managing communication in organizations. In section 1, I shall discuss leadership in terms of communication by drawing upon the article by Barry B. (2007). In addition, I shall also discuss the use of communication in running an organization in a leader’s desired way (Jack, G., 2004) and the need of contingency approach (Browning, 2007, pg 190) while communicating with employees. In section 2, I shall discuss how management stimulate loyalty in employees through embedding organizational identity (Gagne, J.F.,

Leadership styles have significant effects on organizations. For instance, it influences organizational culture and determines how leaders address conflict. Ultimately, it impacts organizational performance. Consequently, leaders must adapt their approach to achieve the desired outcome. Therefore, it is imperative leaders understand and can implement a variety of leadership styles. This essay will describe how an autocratic and participative leader’s style impacts organizational culture, summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each style, and explain how each leader would successfully resolve conflict.

Bureaucratic leadership style has a long history. It’s been used in politics and in religions organisations around the world. The effectiveness of the style has seen a number of great leaders take advantage of the framework, with business leaders understanding the essential nature of the style.

The way that modern businesses operate and are perceived has changed dramatically in the past few decades. Some of these changes have been “cosmetic” whereas some of them have revolutionised company and employee management. “Google’s organisational structure and workplace practices (such as their ‘fun at work’ initiatives) not only allow for increasingly creative and innovative ideas to emerge, but are also undoubtedly positive for employee well-being”. This report will outline how Google and other organisations have developed and successfully applied different management strategies that deviate from the standard bureaucratic model.

The post-bureaucratic era has seen the augmentation of leadership practices cultivating business sustainability from a pecuniary model to an ecological modernised ideology. Although, such dynamic contribution to business dogma has transformed neo-classical principles. Thus, exemplifying it as a “hybrid” form of economic “bureaucratic” growth and “Weberian” social and environmental rational (Clegg and Courpasson 2004: pg; 527). In this essay, I argue that post-bureaucratic leadership practices contribute to managing sustainability to an extent, as prior bureaucratic methods remain interpolated. Firstly, in section one I evaluate the limitations of groupthink cultivating a “fear of separation” within in post-bureaucratic era by calling on the views of Dimtroff, Schmidt and Bond (2005) however, I compare its effectiveness through the Columbian and the Challenger accident incurred by NASA, suggesting “post-heroic” forms of “group think” encumber judgement of management limiting ethicality. Following this, I will contrast the argument by drawing upon Clegg, Teo and Josserand (2006), implying that changes in practices within the post-bureaucratic era have “branched” and remain interpolated with bureaucratic leadership styles. In doing so, I will examine the writings of Stubbs and Coklin (2008), exploring the effects of the sustainable business model through Bendigo Bank and Interface, advocating that leadership practice contributes to the purpose of an organisation, through an

This Leadership Theory and Practice class was not at all what I expected it to be, which is great. I had heard of other people who had taken this class previously with different professors and how all they did was write papers and honestly, hardly learned anything about leadership. This class thankfully had an easy work load which helped with my senioritus, but still challenged me to think about different leadership styles, concepts, and what it truly means to be a leader. I was able to hear the views of many other people especially those who were also in the class, but also from the different people we had interviewed for the assignment we had to present on. I learned a lot about leadership and I learned a lot about myself in a leadership

Situational approach is either applying supportive or directive behaviors to specific situations. Every situation is unique which is why different methods should be applied accordingly, depending on the dynamics of the situation. To determine what behaviors are needed, a leader must analyze his or her followers’ commitment and competence.

According to Robbins, Bergman, Stagg and Coulter (2012, p. 606) the General Manager, Edward of 6 Steps & Rising has adopted an autocratic leadership style. The University of Iowa Studies identifies an autocratic leader as a leader that centralises authority, controls work methods and processes, makes independent decisions and restricts participation or feedback from employees (Robbins et al., 2012). He practices autocratic leadership styles when he centralises authority by disallowing Albert to see the chief executive officer regarding his request to transfer to other offices, controls creative processes that Teresa has put forward, makes independent decisions by implementing restrictive rules to govern employees and ignoring feedback

Positive Psychology is defined as “…the scientific study of human flourishing, and an applied approach to optimal functioning. It has also been defined as the study of the strengths and virtues that enable individuals, communities and organizations to thrive” (Gable & Haidt, 2005, Sheldon & King, 2001, as cited by Positive Psychology Institute). According to Martin Seligman, one of Positive Psychology’s pioneers, positive psychology consists of three major components- “pleasure and gratification”, “strength and virtue”, & “meaning and purpose”. He believes that the road to “lasting fulfillment” is a journey in which an individual must pass through each component in chronological order. (Seligman)

The concepts of Positive Psychology are explored through an intrapersonal, interpersonal, and pro-social lens using empirical research as the basis. The paper examines the history, intentions and scope of positive psychology in relationship to personal experiences and character traits that lead to personal effectiveness. The specific Areas of Focus examine the major principles of Positive Psychology and their importance with regards to; changes in emotional states, cognitive processes and experiences in juxtaposition with current research. The concepts and principles are then applied to current

In this essay, I will argue the way in which practices of leadership contribute to managing innovation, change and rationality in the post-bureaucratic era. More specifically, I will delve into the issue of women in leadership roles and how their prevalence has evolved throughout the post-bureaucratic era. In order to understand exactly how the practices of leadership have contributed to managing innovation, change and rationality, we must first understand what leadership is. According to Clegg, Kornberger and Pitsis (2012), leadership is defined as the process of directing, controlling, motivating and inspiring employees to common organisational goals. This definition however, underemphasises the complexity of leadership and the ways in which

Leadership practices have changed in the post-bureaucratic era owed to the pressures of globalisation, technological advancements and the change in the division of labour. These pressures led to traditional modes of managerial authority to be overlooked and instigating the idea of sharing power between management and employees while altering the approaches to leadership. This revolution of change has transformed the way organisations control, direct and motivate employees, as it places its emphasis and efforts in positively managing employees to achieve both organisational and personal goals. As such, this essay will, therefore, scrutinize the change of traditional leadership practices and study its roots to bureaucracy through analysing leadership

In this assignment I will be looking at the different styles of leadership and giving examples of when they may be used throughout the public services.