Essay on Leadership Reflection Plan

Qualities of being a leader require a specific amount of traits. To be a leader is the ability to gain the attention of your audience and become an idol to them. Being a leader can be tough, it takes perseverance, communication, and speak your mind when need be. Also responsibility, being able to own up if you’re wrong about something and not lead your group in the wrong direction. Leaders also never give up when it gets tough, because being a leader isn’t always going to be easy. That’s what makes a leader.

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

To be a leader, one must have certain traits that contribute, in a good way, to their leadership. An example could be persistence. What is a leader without persistence, what would be the point of them doing anything at all? Bravery is another valuable trait to have. In order to be a leader, you must be brave enough to stand for what you believe in and what you want to change, even when the outcome may seem bleak. One more essential trait: motivation. A leader simply cannot be a leader if no one is motivated to follow them. An example of a leader who exhibits all three of these characteristics in a great way would be Martin Luther King Jr. He was an African-American man who lived in a segregated time and place. Quickly, King became a leader

A well-researched knowledge-base is a necessity. Organization is also key to being a leader. A leader must plan thoroughly to properly direct the group. Even though careful planning is crucial, a leader must remain flexible when problems arise. Remaining humble is also important. Once a leader raises her/himself above the group, s/he will lose respect and will be seen as a ruler - and not a leader. A leader must see eye-to-eye with the group to retain an effective role. To manage the needs of the group, a leader must be trusting enough to allow others to help. If a leader makes all the decisions without the group’s input, or does not allow the group an active role, the group will no longer agree with the leader and will not feel valued. The leader’s effectiveness and respect form the group will the drop. The group must also trust the leader to make wise decisions. Despite the fact that these qualities are mostly seen when leading a cause, they can be extended to other roles of leadership.

Leadership is defined as the ability to accomplish a set goal(s) due to the act of inspiring and motivating a group of your peers. Former United States president Dwight D. Eisenhower made famous a quote that stated, “Leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for everything that goes wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes well.” (Notable-quotes.com). One of the most important aspects of the work area is leadership. Without leadership, there will be no guidance to for teamwork and the percentage of successful goal will be slim to none. Becoming a great leader is no easy feat however. An exceptional leader must lock in on specific attributes such as intellect, moral character, and human

The purpose of this paper is to reflect and make an analysis of the general strength and weaknesses of a leader, provide recommendations thoughts of overall performance to improve on this person’s leadership style in which practices and theories were utilized most effective. Draw conclusions and provide an integration of this leadership practice into my own leadership practice. Accomplishment of this will be achieved be identifying several key practices from publish documents about the leader and comparing them to known relative concepts for a holistic view of the approach.

The three most important things that I have learned are based on the foundation of systems theory. Communities are made of a giant system and immeasurable subsystems acting and reacting with one another. When the various systems become unstable, resulting needs arise. Often, there are so many contributions to an issue; one has a great deal of difficulty understanding the source of the problem. Rather, the primary importance is accepting the relationships between individuals and environments. Communities must recognize that those within the system are responsible for taking the steps to provide stability for existence and intervening to strengthen existing structures (Homan, 2011).

The purpose of this paper is to reflect and make an analysis of the general strengths and weaknesses of a leader, provide recommendations, thoughts of overall performance to improve on this person’s leadership style in which practices and theories were utilized most effectively. Upon such, draw conclusions and provide an integration of this leadership practice into my own leadership practice. The accomplishment of this will be achieved by identifying several key practices from published documents surrounding and encompassing the leader, and comparing them to known relative concepts for a holistic view of the approach.

The leadership role I chose is that of a group director of research and design at a high tech company in California’s Bay Area. Since its inception, the organization has been constantly evolving and consists of many teams spread around the globe. The core values of the organization that unite and guide the company’s actions are integrity, execution excellence, leadership, and passion. The organization’s values and mission are reviewed annually and discussed at

Leadership Theory versus Leadership Practice can be compared to as two whole different worlds. Leadership Theories are explained and built in an imaginary world by taking few real life factors that might affect decision making of a leader. Whereas leader ship in practice is decision making of a leader in an unpredictable world. This paper is all about the compare and contrasts between Leadership Theory versus Leadership Practice, give my personal opinion on this topic and come to a conclusion if Leadership Theory and Leadership Practice are same always or they are different sometimes. According to Lussier and Achua (2012) there is a leader in everyone and everyone plays a role of a leader. In practical life you are a leader for your life. There are hundreds of fine studies and theories are produced for the past multiple decades which studies the leadership styles, their traits and sorting procedures for an understanding of your personal traits and leadership style. These studies and theories are of a huge importance for a self as well as for an organization. For self, according to me these studies gives valuable information on yourself traits, know more about you and your hidden talents. This will be a huge help in improving your positives and your strengths and also correcting your negatives and your weaknesses. Coming to an organization, these studies and tools are like a power shields for the Human resources team and the management team to hire a new employee or promote a

Departing from the theoretical definitions of leadership in terms of assumptions of group members and the use of broad terms like "power" and "characteristics best suited" are definitions that are more practical in nature. Leadership can also be defined as the person or persons who possess directive roles in any group interaction (Hollander, 1985). All of these theorists' definitions of leadership stress the fact that leadership is not a one-person social process. In order for a person to be a successful leader and exhibit those leadership skills which are accepted and praised by the dominant culture, there must be followers, or people whom the leader can lead (Hollander, 1985). The discussion of the qualities of leaders and origins of leadership will follow the detailing of the theoretical definition of power.

During the past ten weeks, I have strengthened my concept of what constitutes effective leadership. Importantly, it is a leadership style that maximises the contributions of followers to achieve the desired outcomes for the organisation they represent. As Nanjundeswaraswamy & Swamy (2014, p.57) explains, effective leaders need to balance the drive to achieve a task with managing relationships. Therefore, it is essential for good leadership to not only focus on the task but develop, motivate and empower team members to strive for the achievement of task goals.

In this paper, leadership will be characterized and dissected. A nitty gritty leader profile from my working environment will be produced and depicted utilizing transformational hypothesis, as this is the most sufficient hypothesis to depict the execution, viability and styles utilized by the leader to accomplish the targets and objectives in my working environment. Leaders are made through the hardships of overseeing or working with individuals in a mixture of settings. Successful leaders are great communicators, ready to talk the numerous dialects of the people inside the gatherings they lead. They give careful consideration. A decent leader gives careful consideration to the actualities and afterward settles on choice focused around target examination of those truths, which is not to say that helpful elements succumb to how the money adds up. They rouse individuals from their activities, which incorporate indicating appreciation, tuning in, reflecting and arranging through clash. Effective leaders take in the qualities and shortcoming of their subordinates and use bunch elements. They sway and enable individuals to attain achievement as opposed to place fault. Leaders have strong vision and steady determination in attaining an objective. They ought to be more valuable than damaging, furthermore listen to other individuals assessments. Their endeavors are enabled by their capacity to oversee and sort out both exercises and time in their occupied timetables (Bates,

Leadership is; expected, valued, respected and rewarded within this organization. This trait is specially selected for, and then systematically developed and honed at all levels, and at all positions within the organization. The ideal style and application methods of such leadership within this organization has evolved over the years. And, the organization has now placed a high premium on those individuals who can not only lead, but that can then readily follow as the situation dictates, who can compete and then later cooperate, and those who can best transition their applied leadership and management style; to best fit the situation and circumstances at hand, ensuring optimal results while inspiring excellence in performance. Rather than those who, for example, simply default to an autocratic and dictatorial leadership style.

If a person was to ponder about where leadership is found they would eventually conclude it is everywhere. Leadership could be argued that when God made the earth and all of its creatures that he gave us the capability to lead. We see this from Adam and Eve, Noah, Sampson, Abraham, David, Sara, Mary, Jesus and all of his disciples. Anyone can be an effective leader if they are educated on how to be one. Leaders are found everywhere in both historically and in today’s time. One can see leaders in action by simply watching the news and analyzing politics. Other examples that one can see and study in today’s times are religious organization leaders, coaches, Principals and teachers, their parents, family members, children and even military personnel. Throughout this paper we will analyze multiple definitions of leadership, my philosophy, my leadership style, how I think and react to situations.