Leadership Style and Personality Assessment

The results of my Leadership Style Assessment was a Participatory Leader. I believe that the results were accurate. I try to listen and understand to everyone’s point of view before making a decision regarding others at work. “Participative leadership also known as Democratic Leadership Style is a method of leadership that involves all team members in terms of identifying important goals as well as developing strategies and procedures to achieve the goals. From this point of view, participative style of leadership can be perceived as a leadership style that relies primarily on functioning as a facilitator that the one who simply issues commands or orders or making assignment for each member of the team.” ("Participative Leadership," p. 1-2) The definition of Participative Leader to me means a Leader that listens and considers every point of view before making a final decision.

Studies have been done that resulted in the development of several different personality tests that would indicate a person’s primary traits and characteristics. Jung’s work on psychological types based a person’s personality on eight different preferences. Myers and Briggs further developed Jung’s work and developed a combination of these preferences resulting in 16 different personality types that would indicate how a person perceives themselves and their awareness of other things, people or ideas. These preferences include orientations of energy (extroversion, E and introversion, I), processes of perception (sensing, S and intuition, N), processes of judging (thinking, T and feeling, F) and attitudes towards dealing with the outside world (perceiving, P and judging, J) (as cited in Hautala, 2006).

Assessments I took that helped me to determine my personal leadership style are: “the Emotional Expressive Scale, Personal Magnetism Deficit Inventory, Task Oriented Attitudinal and Behavior assessment, Clarifying your Work Values, What Style of Leader are you or would you be, What is your propensity of taking Risk, How

This research focuses on four leadership styles that have been used within the organization. These styles play apart in the success of objectives and tasks being accomplished.

For this assignment, I have decided to use the leadership trait, skills and style questionnaires. For this questionnaire, I asked 5 different people that know me in different contexts in life, such as personal, school, and work environments. For the majority, I rated myself higher on the traits than my fellow colleagues. On some of the traits however, I was rated higher than what I thought. Overall, I averaged a 4/5 which means that everyone agreed with the traits that were given. For the style questionnaire, I found out that I place more emphasis in building relationships rather than completing tasks. Finally, the skills questionnaire, my leadership skills are in the high range for technical skills, and my human and conceptual skills are in the moderate range.

What leadership or management style speaks most to me? They are a few leadership styles that I venerate. The Transformational Leadership, the Visionary Leadership, and the Charismatic Leadership styles are the most evident to me. Each one has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, each is congruent with what I believe is necessary to craft the ideal leader and the combination is something I strive to emulate as I learn the nuances

There is much to consider when evaluating leadership styles. Much of it is an introspective quest of where do I fit or belong. I do not want to force myself into a category, and what if I do not fit a category? These were thoughts as I considered where I should place myself assigning a label to my leadership style. A couple resonated well with me like transitional and transformative leadership as they are flexible and make room to impact others; however, I did not feel as though I fit the mold well. I most comfortably fit in the Authentic Leadership Model.

Discuss the results of the personality and leadership style indicator. Include your four-letter type formula, strengths of preferences, the description of your personality type, and your “animal” personality type.

My time attending Southwestern College has provided me an abundance of knowledge on leadership styles, preferences, and traits. The knowledge I have gained has served to make me a better leader in my organization. My definition of leadership has changed as well. My definition of a leader is one who maintains a positive outlook and possesses great skills at inspiring people to action even when the outcome may seem unachievable. Leaders need to have the ability to adapt to ever changing situations. Gone are the days of the one size fits all leadership. Leaders need to understand the situation and adapt accordingly to ensure impacts to the team are minimized.

Upon review of the nine leadership styles the following styles: ______ mostly closely mirror my personal perspective. Each of these leadership philosophies has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, each is congruent with what I believe is necessary to craft the ideal leader. Through the combined usage of these styles I strive to emulate the wholesomeness of leadership as I am continuously exposed to the nuances experienced by leaders. Furthermore, they are in unison with the most effective leadership philosophies of some of the world’s most notable leaders. Although, I find that the styles alone are not perfect and are most effective when merged. Of the three styles I’ve chosen as anchors to creating a distinctive

The three empirical articles primarily studies is about leadership and how personality traits of a leader can reflect and affect his or her role. The first article was conducted by Liliendfel, Waldman, Landfield, Watts, Rubenzer, and Faschingbauer in 2012 titled, “Fearless Dominance and the U.S. Presidency: Implications of Psychopathic Personality Traits for Successful and Unsuccessful Political Leadership” whose purpose is to evaluate and measure the personality of the 42 U.S. presidents. The second article titled as, “Impact of Personal Growth Projects on Leadership Identity Development,” by Odom, Boyd, and Williams (2012) whose objective was to examine students’ reflection of their personal growth project. Lastly, the third article is, “Leadership Styles and Associated Personality Traits: Support for the Conceptualisation of Transactional and Transformational Leadership” by van Eeden, Cilliers, and van Deventer (2008) whose motive was to examine a group of management teams using various measuring instruments. This synthesis paper is to discover the common themes addressed in each of the three articles, as well as, a conclusion that can be drawn, and provide an overall message of the group of articles.

Regarding leadership styles, which are recurring patterns of acts presented by a leader, it is easy to talk about the classic leadership styles which are autocratic, human-relations, laissez-faire and democratic style (Goleman D. 2000).

Through experience, business leaders are coming to understand that management styles are more about organizational circumstance rather than individual preferences. Often, it is necessary to use more than one leadership style. Which ones depend on what challenge the business leader currently faces.

Leadership styles vary and each style serves a purpose. Deciding which style best will work for your business is imperative. For example, transactional leadership sets the base for required levels of performance while Transformational Leadership

I used the MMDI test which gives you similar result to the Myers-Briggs test. My results were ESTJ. The letter E stands for Extraversion. An extrovert gets their energy from other people and tends to like working in groups. They typically learn though interacting with their surrounds and engaging with the environment. S stands for sensing. This scale focuses on how you receive information. These people learn from facts, typically have more common sense, and are good with memorizing facts. Next, letter is a T, which stands for thinking. This scale tells you how you like to make decisions. These people typically use logic and reasoning to make decisions and analyze and weigh different evidence when trying to make different decisions. Lastly, I tested the letter J, which stands for judging. This scale tells the person about their life style and work habits. These people typically live a very structured and orderly life. They are known to plan ahead and are very well organized.