Leadership Styles And Evaluating An Enhanced Approach

The results of my Leadership Style Assessment was a Participatory Leader. I believe that the results were accurate. I try to listen and understand to everyone’s point of view before making a decision regarding others at work. “Participative leadership also known as Democratic Leadership Style is a method of leadership that involves all team members in terms of identifying important goals as well as developing strategies and procedures to achieve the goals. From this point of view, participative style of leadership can be perceived as a leadership style that relies primarily on functioning as a facilitator that the one who simply issues commands or orders or making assignment for each member of the team.” ("Participative Leadership," p. 1-2) The definition of Participative Leader to me means a Leader that listens and considers every point of view before making a final decision.

Ms. Stewart’s autocratic leadership is not favored by her team members and associates. This research will analyze the effects of an autocratic leadership style on the organization as a whole and the team members themselves. There is a reason why most are not too fond of the autocratic leadership style. In today’s world, most employees are not receptive to an autocratic leadership style. The theories that are discussed are based on what motivates team members. Are team members self-motivated? Do team members dislike working? Is little direction needed? In order to ensure results, do team members have to be enticed? The answers to these questions determine what type of behavior the leader should possess in order to effectively lead his or her team members.

Beyond communication, leadership types affect how Groupthink plays a role in a company or small group. Each member creates their own style and the leaders response develops their own. In response to the group's actions the leader can respond in an autocratic style. This style of leadership lays out a set of rules they deem fit to govern the group. This type of leader has a certainty about their headship which causes less mistakes. This type of leader doesn’t incorporate everyone else’s idea. A bureaucratic style leader follows the existing rules, but leaves rules for adjustment. According to Cragan and the other authors from the worksheet on leadership perspectives, This is one of the most ideal styles of leadership out of the others. Democratic style of leadership, although it allows for group input, it takes longer

Effective leaders are driven and want to shape the future. It is a team effort and leaders make sure each individual understands the big picture. In addition, leadership will not only build confidence within but also be very beneficial for a successful business. Leaders are important to provide an understanding of what the company goals are and where the long term vision is overall. Effective leaders make things happen. It is vital for the company to build a trust within the team and be very open about the vision the company. Building a strong foundation for any business including having a strategy in action of assigning accountability, making change pleasant, and who to delegate for certain assignments will assure a well-rounded team working together to accomplish goals. This essay will demonstrate the leadership abilities and methodologies, which will help to give me a better understanding through self-assessments, leadership experiences, influences from personal relationships, and plans of action which will improve my leadership skills.

According to McPheat (2010), the main style of the leader is democratic. Democratic leader is who values the team’s ideas and looks for own input in decision-making. Furthermore, this style is tending to motivate members to do their best work (Cunningham, Salomone & Wiegus, 2015). However, even though democratic style values team’s ideas and decision making, leader will have to think about the decision for a long time that might be a disadvantage. The core beliefs and values is being a leader means taking full responsibilities of what the group is doing and in charge of the group. To be able to do this, the leader who is leading the group for the first time needs to learn effective way to become a great leader. As well as guiding them to produce creative ideas or new plans for the work to make it successful. Additionally, leader need to have aims and goals set to achieve during team work, try best to influence the group members, motivate members by assigning them to different variety tasks, instead of making them do same tasks that will make their motivation go down, show own skills to the members so leadership can be proved and gain more trust. However, a leader must overcome some barriers. First, cultural differences. As for this, leader must overcome cultural difference, as not all members are from same culture; it means that their acts of behaviours and opinions will differ and often will

I performed a self-evaluative test to find what kind of leader I am and found that by large I am a participative leader. I do agree with these test findings, as I feel each team member is equally important. I do not believe that any one person can have all the answers to everything, rather, that everyone should work together and come up with solutions. In regards to the other two leadership styles, I scored next highest in the delegate category and the least amount in the authoritative category. In this paper I will give a comprehensive overview of leadership styles and leadership management theories and how they relate to my style. Lastly, I will discuss my type of work environment, and three key actions or behaviors that I must demonstrate to be a successful leader.

The success of a leader depends on the type of leadership style that he or she uses in a situation. We can use the metaphor of leaders as farmers. The type of equipment that the farmer uses take to farm the land and the way that he or she uses the equipment will determine how productive the effort will be. If the farmer takes an axe to plough the land instead of a plough, well, the result will be a disaster. That said, there is a time and place for all leadership styles (Rhea Blanken). In the following paragraphs, we will explain the eight common leadership styles, when to use them, the impact that each has on an individual, the management, and the organization.

A leadership style is defined by the approach of the leader in the process full of activity. The school leadership style is one of the most important and key factors in achieving team progress due to its impact on contentment, motivation, obligation, quality and the stage or level of teacher?s acting as well as its influence on the success of the students. I have realized that the main role of a leader in a school is to use the most effective leadership style so as to bring about the discharge of duties by others i.e. teachers, students, staff and parents in the most appropriate manner so as to achieve maximum success in the school. A good leader must shift his

Leadership, in short, is an art. One needs to be highly skillful and crafty in their leadership styles in effectively influencing and steering a group of individuals towards a common set of goals. This is to suggest that 1) the type of leader, which also refers to the leader’s ‘personality’, characterized by traits and personal qualities, utilized to earn the trust of the people and lead them to undertake the major tasks, and 2) his style of leadership, which describes the competencies and skills that the leader ‘applies’ to guide, facilitate and support the people of the organization in their efforts to accomplish the task, are the determinant factors of an effective leader.

This model proposed that effective group performance depends on the relation between leader’s style and control or influence on the situation. This theory focused that there are some leadership styles which are suitable for some situations. The main point was to define those styles and situation and the other main point was to identify the combinations of style and situation. Fiedler proposed the style as key element. So the style can be task oriented or it can be relationship oriented so least preferred coworker questionnaire was used to measure style. This questionnaire contained 18 pairs of contrasting adjective on scale of 1 to 8. Fiedler admits that some may fall in between those extremes and another thing Fiedler assumed was the fixed style of leader in all situations (Robbins,Coulter& Vohra,

There are various styles of leadership such as an autocratic manager who generally dominates and work to achieve a single objective, a democratic manager who encourages employee participation and a laissez-faire manager who generally leaves the decision making to employees who will mostly be affected by the outcome.

Different business situations require specific leadership styles. These leadership styles include participative, autocratic, leadership grid based and entrepreneurial. The Participative leadership style is characterized by a leader who turns to the team for input, ideas, and observations instead of making all decisions on their own. The leader recognizes that the team has skills and ideas that could benefit the decision making process. Participative leadership requires the whole team to be involved. Benefits of this style of leadership includes having subordinates feeling empowered and important. Its also able to give different strategies and decisions from perspectives of other people which can benefit decision making in that the decision in not

So, the main question is : Which of this leadership style is better according to various past researches? The answer is : It depends. Leadership style has changed from a very autocratic approach to a very creative participative approach. This

According to Burrow & Kleindl (2013), there are three leadership styles by which a leader influences individuals and these can be classified as: Authoritarian or autocratic, democratic and free reign or laissez-faire leadership styles. To describe them briefly, authoritarians define the procedures and instruct people on what they need to do and how to do it. There is little contribution taken from the group because the tasks must be done quickly. On the other hand, the democratic style is the opposite of authoritarian because of how it encourages ideas and active participation from the team. Lastly, the free reign leadership style enables individuals to work on their own because they are not imposed with any kind of control and they are solely responsible of their own activities as long as the needed output is achieved (Certo, 2012). Aside from the three styles that were previously mentioned, there are leaders who prefer to by any of the following: ethical, multicultural, transformational, strengths-based, managerial and influential. The reason for the variability can be due to the following characteristics: Leader, task, follower and organizational (Bowerman, K & Van Mart M, 2011). Leadership characteristics include a person’s traits and

Leadership style refers to the way in which the functions provides of Leadership are carried out, the way in which the manager typically behaves forward members of the group. (2013) Laurie and Gill, the authoritative style leader pays attention to every one, through the participation to enhance the sense of responsibility, come to an agreement, but it can leads to countless meetings, reduces the work efficiency. The reaschers found the consultative style leader through mutual communication will create a harmonious atmosphere, helps the team morale, improve communication between staff, restore trust among employees, however,This leadership style tends to praise for employees, give employees the wrong direction. The Pacesetting style leader eyesights extremely high performance standards and will take the lead to do an example, it asked the leadership of the staff who has a strong ability for self motivation. This leadership will give employees bring strong work pressure. The Coercive Style leader needs staff immediately obey, long-term use of this leadership style, it will causes a decline in morale seriously and eventually leads to the destruction of the organisation. The Coaching Style leader will help employees determine their own a little and weaknesses, relate personal needs and team goals. When employees know their weaknesses and aware of the need to develop new skills, and to improve myself, to be very