Leadership Theories And Style Of Australia

In this assignment I aim to outline the advantages, disadvantages and overall effectiveness of the different styles of leadership.

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

When developing a template to assess which leadership styles are best suited to mitigate the effects of a decline in financial compensation, it is imperative to understand leadership theory. One of the first pioneers in leadership theory was Kurt Lewin. Kurt Lewin (1890–1947), was a prominent figure in psychology in his generation. He provided a solid foundation to the teachings of organizational development. In many circles he was known as the father of organizational development. He was best known for the development of field theory. Field theory was essential because it allowed business professionals to understand why undesirable behaviors was produced. It also taught how to bring about desirable behaviors. Field theory was developed in part because Lewin wanted to address organizational employee turnover.

Australia has a very similar, but also different background. “[It was] something of the global diaspora of British culture and it’s creative encounter with two quite different environments.” Both cultures have proved to be very different over the last few decades, but both countries have had to face the consequences of overthrowing confinements of provincialism. They have each created their own identities, but can share the common interest of being culturally diverse while having a background in British culture. The country, of Australia, began, much like America, with a group of British societies settling down and destroying the world that had been created by the aboriginal people who were already there. Both countries are different, but also similar in some ways.

The essay classifies leadership into four key approaches: (1) trait approach, (2) behaviour approach, (3) the

The author teaches classes of management and leadership at the Australian National University, and he is also a practicing management consultant with projects encompassing four continents.

“Culture is the ideas, customs and social behaviour of a particular society. There is an Australian culture that is made up from the multicultural society within it. I feel as though if Australia wasn’t multicultural, it would lack a lot of culture.”(Informant 4)

Though the theories of leadership glorify factors, such as personal significance, timing, special skills, responsiveness, or power, as the qualities of a leader, I believe that neither of those factors are as essential as being personable. I believe being personable is the greatest determinant since a leadership position requires public speaking, either in the form of one-to-one conversations or to an audience. I believe that a leader should create an impression that will motivate and inspire others. Therefore, they should be able to create an impressive and enduring impression. Leaders should speak to others in a way that is respectful, friendly, and relatable. If they are unable to do so, then no matter how powerful or significant the individual, not a single person will follow, admire, or respect them.

The aim of this article is to explore different leadership styles and the way they influence their work outcome.

Since its days as a British colony Australia has developed a complex national culture with immigrants from many parts of the world as well as an indigenous Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. The strong sense of societal and historical distinctiveness among the different states and territories has developed into subcultural diversity based on geographic regions.

This report reviews and examines the theories behind leadership; identifying and analysing the concept of leadership and leaders from an analytical perspective. Some of the key points will focus on areas I have particular disputes with. Areas such as:

According to organisational behaviour by McShane, leadership is defined as influencing, motivating and enabling others to contribute towards the effectiveness and success of the organisation of which they are members (page 382, McShane).Becoming an effective leader depends on the leader’s leadership style. Successful leaders have vision and charisma, also the leader should have an ongoing personality, talkative, careful and self-disciplined. The leader must also have self-concept

Throughout history to present day, Australian culture has become the product of a distinct blend of established traditions and new influences. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, the country’s original inhabitants, created the foundation for the land’s cultural traditions over 40,000 years ago. In addition, the rest of Australia’s people are migrants or descendants of migrants from various other countries who transported their own customs, beliefs, and value systems to the land. As a result, Australia’s culture has significantly broadened its social and cultural profile over the years, and still continues to evolve today.

Globalisation is the process whereby improved communications lower transport costs and unrestricted trade and financial flows are turning the world into a single market. As such many Australian businesses now compete against overseas products in the domestic market. As a consequence, managers have been forced to deal with these challenges and thus have adopted more efficient forms of business structure. This has a direct influence on the leadership functions applied. One such business structure is the behavioural approach to management. This emphasises a leadership style focusing on the human side of the work place. This style involves the leader including one or more employees in the decision making process however, the leader still maintains the final decision making authority. Relationships are based on respect and trust information is disseminated more freely, tasks are not as structured and employee input is taken into account by the leader. The Cynefin framework helps leaders to determine the prevailing the operative context so that the appropriate choices may be made. Complex and Chaotic context are unordered. Behavioural management theory allows the leader to apply these contexts to the leadership function. As opposed to falling back into traditional command and control management styles, leaders will look for opportunities to improve innovation, creativity in order to satisfy relationships

The styles today are less authoritative and more on trying to get feedback from co-workers. This change is driven by today’s individuals that want to be treated with respect and empowered to be self-driven. Today’s business environment requires managers to constantly evaluate his or her leadership style to maintain the so called competitive edge. Leadership moves through many power roles and how power vs. soft power that relates to managers as they manage people. The types of leaders are described with characteristics, as it relates to each individual. The characteristics styles that leaders show