A CEO position includes a variety of roles and high level of responsibility. This will require them to have well-rounded set of personality traits to be able to manage all aspects of their job. Unlike a middle-tier manager that oversees employees, a CEO is the most senior member of organization. Ideally, the CEO will follow the behavioral theory of leadership identified by the University of Michigan as employee oriented, placing a value on building an atmosphere of interpersonal relationships and employee satisfaction (Robbins & Coulter, 2012, p. 462). Leadership trait theories identify seven characteristics; six are desirable in the CEO, but prioritized as followed: Self-confidence, Intelligence, job-relevant knowledge, drive and desire …show more content…
The first is the forming stage, which begins with the invitation to the group and continues as they begin to form a group identity. The following is the storming stage, at which point conflict is to be expected and results in coming to an understanding of rules regarding interaction and work processes. This is followed by the norming stage, at which point the group should have begun to form relationships and have a sense of fellowship, and there are expectations set for work and social interactions. In the performing stage, work is being accomplished and processes are routinely followed. In the final stage, adjourning, the group is being disbanded. (Robbins & Coulter, 2012) Norbert should look at the team, identify the stage that the team is in currently, and see if there is breakdown in one of these stages. Adding new team members to the group may cause discourse as they attempt to fit in or assert themselves. This is especially true if new team members are not used to working with a self-managed team. Additionally, changes to the work that impact the team rules and processes that were previously established could also potentially cause issues. Changes to the group may resulting in revert back to the storming and norming …show more content…
Nonverbal communication can conflict with verbal messages, creating confusion. Diverse teams can experience miscommunication when there are cultural differences that are not acknowledged, or negative stereotypes influence the attitudes of team members. Norbert should verify the teams have come to an agreement on methods for addressing conflict so team members feel they can safely bring up questions or concerns. Regardless of the root cause of the teams not getting along, Norbert should recognize that communication is a part of the any solution and consider team building events to smooth the path going
The outcome of this constructive conservation was a list of 1,800 items describing various facets of leader behavior. Afterward, the different items were assigned, and a questionnaire was composed consisting of 150 questions for describing leader behaviors, the so-called “Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ)”, (p. 76).
Leadership is an influential factor in the success and failure. If an organization is failing, look at the leader, not the economy; not the market; look at the leader. The movements and influence of a leader determines the fate of those under her or him. The importance of leadership cannot be underestimated. The importance of leadership has constantly been debated and a part argumentative discussion. There is no one approach to leadership, however leadership theories try to make sense of various approaches to leadership. James G. Clawson is considered an authority in leadership theories. His Level III leadership theory is about managing energy, first in leader, and then in those around the leader.
This paper will describe and provide examples surrounding various leadership theories and leadership styles that sustain the definition of a public leader. First, this paper will provide a definition of a public leader. Next, it determine two leadership theories and two leadership styles that support the definition of a public leader. Also, this paper will assess the effectiveness of the two leadership theories. Subsequently, it will assess the effectiveness of the two leadership styles. Further, this paper will utilize proper in-text citations and references, as well as integrate effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing. Finally, it will provide information in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner, using logic to support all ideas.
Leadership is "the behaviour of an individual when he is directing the activities of a group towards a shared goal". (Hemphill and Coons, 1957, p.7)
There are many theories that explain leadership. Chapter 10 presents each of the leading theories. Each student will choose one of the theories he/she agrees with, one theory that he/she disagrees with, and one theory he/she finds interesting (pick three different theories). Each student will write a short paragraph for each of the above choices (agree, disagree, interesting). Each student will post his/her three paragraphs as one (1) response to the discussion board entitled “Leadership”.
I found it scary to think and yet very true when Gandolfi and Stone (2016) discussed in a rather recent article that leadership is so crucial that not only can organization or communities suffer from poor leadership but also even our society as a whole can experience a huge negative impact. The importance of leadership in an organizational setting is to motivate individuals to complete a common goal. There are several leadership styles and it is a good idea that we view various models in order for leaders to get a better understanding how to involve those working alongside other colleagues thus allowing everyone to move forward together and accomplish set goals for an institution (Volckmann, 2012). A few examples include, Behavioral Approach, Path-Goal, and, Situational and thinking
Effective leadership is essential to the overall success of any organization. Leadership attributes or qualities and leadership theories have been studied by a variety of fields including business, healthcare, finance, political science, psychology, and more. There seems to be a paradigm shift in leadership theories and qualities that is focusing on the relationship of the leader to his or her subordinates as well as the population they are serving. Parris and Peachey state “leadership is a skill used to influence followers in an organization to work enthusiastically towards goals specifically identified for the common good” (Parris & Peachey, 2013, p. 377). The paradigm shift is occurring secondary to the public downfall in recent years
My leadership philosophy is all about people, to elaborate on this principle I believe that Soldiers are the Army’s most precious assets as a fighting force. I believe that leadership is treating Soldiers with respect to influence them in order to achieve their full potential and strive to provide them with mentoring along the way.
The concept of Transformational Leadership was initially introduce be leadership expert and presidential biographer James McGregor Burns (About, 2015). This type of leadership requires for leaders and followers to have a connection like no other where mutual respect and trust has to be the foundation of the working relationship. The idea is that in the end everyone results benefited in one way or another. A different approach on leadership is Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y. Managers who get involved with Theory X believe that workers need to be constantly supervised. On the other hand, Theory Y suggests that employees themselves are well disciplined and have control as of how they will achieve their goals.
Leadership is being able to get people on the same page and work towards a common goal. Our text talked about a few theories such as the “great man” and trait theory, behavioral approaches, and situational and contingency approaches. In this paper I will apply one of the leadership theories from the course text to an organization and explain how the theory works with an example, describe how power and the influence of leaders effect followers in the organization, assess the role and efficiency of transformational and transactional leadership in the organization, assess the traits and characteristics of an effective team leader within the organization, explain how the leadership supports vision, mission, and strategy in the organization,
In today’s world, leaders are not defined by age, race or gender. They can be a high school basketball coach, the shift supervisor at the local coffee shop, or even the President of the United States of America. In as many ways that leaders can vary by appearance and responsibility, there is also a variance in the ways that they lead. This case study aims to compare three of the more popular theories of leadership. These leadership theories are situational leadership, trait theory and transformational leadership.
Behavioral theory promotes the value of leadership styles with an emphasis on concern for people and collaboration. It promotes participative decision making and team development by supporting individual needs and aligning individual and group objectives. Behavioral Theories of Leadership, also known as “The style approach to leadership” focuses on the behavior of the leader and what leaders do and how they act. Learn about the two general kinds of behaviors; task behaviors and relationship behaviors and advantages of this approach to leadership. Learn more about this theory of leadership. What are Behaviors? Behavior is the range of actions and mannerisms made by organisms, systems, or artificial
You assign a new employee a task as you run off to a meeting, do your work or to take that precious lunch break. When you get back, you learn that this person has not completed what you have asked of him/her, not because they did not want to, but because they did not know how and did not ask for help. Because of this, time is wasted and now you have to actually do some work yourself. What would be a good way to minimize the likelihood of things like this happening in the future?
Chapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn 't always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tend to practice those principles most of the time and I assume these are theories that I truly tend to continue in a long run.
These leadership theories are grouped in trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and power and influence theories. Trait theories focus on the traits and skills that successful leaders must have. Initially, these theories state that these skills are innate, but research shows that individuals can also develop such skills and become leaders. Behavioral theories focus on other issues, like the behavior of leaders within their teams, in relationship with stakeholders, and within society. In accordance with these theories, these are several leadership styles, like autocratic or authoritarian, democratic, participative, laissez faire, and other styles. These theories state that the behavior of leaders significantly influences their and their teams' performance.