Leadership Theories Essay

Leadership has been defined in various ways according to different schools of thoughts and approaches in which the concept has been looked at, but the general ideas that leadership is about the effective vision drawing, planning for achieving the goals, motivating people towards the pre-determined achievements, monitoring the performance, reviewing the results of past agendas and ability to avoid shortcomings if present. There are several theories of leadership depending on the approaches of the person in leading. These are “Great Man” or trait theory, position –function of the leader, power relationship – effect on group behaviour and the leadership from the influence on the organisational culture.

Leaders have a “the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals” (Robbins & Judge, 2007, p. 402). In the past leaders have been described by certain traits or characteristics. These traits can help an organization identify potential candidates who may be strong leaders. Later behavior approaches of leaders were identified that could be taught. In short, leaders could be made. Situations have an impact on which leader behaviors will be most effect at any given time. Several contingency theories have been formulated over the years to identify how situations influence leadership behavior. Each style has strengths and

In the changing business environment, leaders of all organisations may face unprecedented uncertainty, especially the technology advancement and changes among the employees. To survive and succeed, leaders should have some necessary attributes. Meanwhile, some changes for leadership skills have to be made to confront the challenges.

The belief of leadership is constantly changing, with many theories and frameworks available. Today’s organizations face ever-increasing change, which includes increased patient demands and work needs, which requires a more adaptive flexible leadership that is becoming increasingly important in the 21st century. Leadership theory and philosophy can be divided into several well-known styles. Within this paper, we will discuss the basis of autocratic, democratic, laissez faire, servant, charismatic, transformational, and situational styles of leadership within the nursing profession, then conclude the writer’s personal philosophies of leadership.

From your perspective, based on the video and articles for this activity, how did GE

Ultimately these factors would result in my behaviour being that of an affiliative and democratic style of leadership. It is also possible that a coaching style my also become apparent, where the factor is that of a personal situation.

My Leadership Philosophy consist of three major parts that can be sub-divided into many smaller parts. As a Non-Commissioned Officer I know that the mission and the welfare of my Soldiers are my main priority and I will instill that. It is my responsibility to ensure that my Soldiers are also guided to success. I believe that there are three major parts of Leadership, dedication and hard work, honesty and empathy, and confidence.

My definition of leadership is, “Leadership is the art of providing challenges, opportunities and direction to others in an effort to motivate them towards providing sustainable solutions or completing pre-determined objectives or tasks. My positive Leadership influences during my Coast Guard career include a Damage Control Chief, who provided countless challenging opportunities, a Boatswain Mate Chief who went out his way to recognize exceptional work as well as requiring the correction of sub par work, a Telephone Technician Chief and two Electronics Warrant Officers for providing limited direction, and all previously mentioned members for allowing me to practice leadership as I have defined it above.

There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.

He confided in the three: Peter, James, and John. They were his closest friends and confidants. His witnesses to his greatest glory (Mark 9:2-3). Took them to special outings (Matthew.

My philosophy on Leadership is to always place Soldiers first. It has been my experience if Soldiers are taken care of and feel as if they are a part of team, where their opinion is valued as much as the next, then they will strive to accomplish the mission to the best of their ability. I personally value respect and the thoughtfulness of others and hold those twos values to the highest regard. A great leader and a caring leader will look past the rank and see someone for who they are and treat them as they themselves want to be treated.

What happens to a person who is thrusted into a leadership position or a person who decides he/she wants to lead others? Would this person have to or need to take leadership classes in order to become a “good” leader or is this something that needs to be learned and nurtured by a mentor? According to Clawson (2006), “leadership is about managing energy, first in yourself and then in those around you” (p. 3). Clawson (2006) further adds that people have good ideas and believe in them but their energy is very low, therefore, they cannot effectively generate enough energy to lead others. This paper will examine four leadership theories, compare and contrast them, and examine how these theories can address contemporary leadership issues and

When you think of the terms: leader and leadership, you generally equate them with being only one person. However, my view of leadership, especially effective leadership, is a shared function between many individuals. There are numerous leadership theories. As a whole, leadership theories should be implemented to contribute to the improvement of our schools.

Traditional theories of leadership were more concentrated on behaviours and traits of leaders, and how they affect subordinates in the workplace. Then came contingency theories, which took into account situational/contextual factors. Newer theories have come up, which introduced the idea that leader-subordinate relationships are individually different.

Some employees will change their outputs to match rewards that they are currently receiving. They can either increase or decrease their outputs. It depends on if they feel like their rewards are greater or lesser. Stephanie’s manager, Jonathan, offers her bonuses to push her to sell expensive products. Therefore, Stephanie increases her work output to match her rewards. Alex’s manager, Dan does not offer him any type of incentive at all. Therefore, Alex’s work output