Leadership Theory And Leadership Theories Essay

This research focuses on four leadership styles that have been used within the organization. These styles play apart in the success of objectives and tasks being accomplished.

With that in mind, leadership theory has identified four management styles--authoritarian, democratic, participatory, and laissez-faire. There is inherently nothing wrong with any of them; all have their place at any given time. But it's the communication aspect that is important when implementing any given method of leadership that makes an organization rise or fall, and determines if respect is retained or lost within the group. Stated another way, the problem does not lie in the styles themselves, but rather in the presentation.

To ensure leadership effective, several leadership theories are put forward and are adopted by different organizations. Some widely accepted theories include Trait Approach, Style Approach, Situational Approach, New Leadership Approach and Post-charismatic & Post-transformational (Western, 2013). Beyond doubt, they have their pros and cons, and they could play their role to guarantee the effectiveness of leadership as long as they are applied in an appropriate condition.

There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.

Copuious research has been organized regarding leadership theories and styles. “The current leadership body of knowledge is a fragmented and “messy landscape” comprising inputs from a variety of contributors including academics, practitioners, and consultants, with numerous self-proclaimed experts and commentators thrown in for good measure.” (Latham, 2014, p.12). Contingent to this week’s assignment I will include four leadership theories, including the founder, the year the theory was introduced, and the key components of the theory. Also, I will include the Leadership Theory Taxonomy in the Apenidx area.

When it comes to leadership, a few core elements guide the way in which different leadership styles organise and manifest. These are:

During this course, the focus has been on leadership and the different theories of leadership. There are either eight to ten leadership theories, depending on the source. Those leadership theories describe different aspects of what it takes to be a leader and the skills and traits of people who are considered leaders. There are two different sets of leadership theories. According to Cherry (2012), when it comes to leadership theories, “most can be classified as one of eight major types.” Those eight major types are called the “Great Man” Theories, Trait theories, Contingency Theories, Situational theories, Behavioral theories, Participative theories, Management theories, and Relationship theories. Those eight leadership theories are similar to the ten leadership theories discussed by Zigarelli. According to Zigarelli (2013), There are ten leadership styles that all have useful aspects to them, and the more that a person learns about all ten theories, they better equipped they will be to become a leader. The ten leadership theories are identical in some areas to the eight leadership theories, but there are some differences. The ten leadership theories are the Great Man Theory, The Trait Theory of Leadership, The Skills Theory of Leadership, The Situational Leadership Theory, The Contingency Theory, Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange Theory, and the Servant Leadership Theory. After

In terms of leadership styles a wide variety exists for one to employ (Boykins, 2013). There isn’t firm consensus as to which styles prove to be the most effective. Different situations call for different approaches. In the article, Empirical Study of Leadership Styles, it discusses several leadership styles that I can relate to.

Then, I will explain which leadership style would fit into each varying aspect. Conversely, I would show why certain leadership styles would not work with certain varying aspects. A few specific leadership styles I will want to focus in on in my paper include: authoritative, democratic, example, and coaching. Authoritative involves tactics such as micromanaging and making decisions for other workers, who the leader is in charge of, democratic is where the leader considers ideas of the people who surround him or her and makes decisions according to group consensus, example requires the leader to set the example for those who surround him or her, and coaching would be the leader encouraging those who surround them to try their own ideas.

There are several leadership theories that have been researched, developed and discussed by various researchers. They include;

A leadership style is a manner and attitude of a leader in which he or she provides direction, fulfills plans and motivates people. Lots of authors have brought many various leadership styles shown by leaders within the political, business or other spheres.

There have been many forms of leadership styles studied over the years. For example, the most common and frequent leadership forms discussed throughout my research are autocratic, democratic,

Among the various theories, two theories of leadership are discussed below to get a brief understanding of the concept.

In a dynamic setting several leadership styles will be very necessary and the ability to adapt is key. There's a lot to learn from each leadership style and when to use it. Here’s the three basic leadership styles:

The goal of this report to introduce three main theoretical approaches that explain leadership. This goal we be achieved by providing a proper definition, explanation, and examples of those three approaches. We used primary and secondary sources to collect information for this report. The report will explain three main theoretical approaches that explain leadership which are the trait approach, the behavioral approach, contingency theories, and will conclude with summary of the theoretical approaches.