Leadership Vs. Authoritative Leadership

1455 WordsSep 20, 20156 Pages
Throughout history, there have been many significant movements and revolutions by people under a strong leader. These societies have been under the influence of many distinct types of leaders. Effective leadership is defined in various ways as some focus on fear and power, while others believe strong leaders focus on respect and propriety. This brings up the argument of collaborative leadership versus authoritative leadership. Authoritative leaders are those who ignore the viewpoints of their followers and lack trust in them while collaborative leaders work with their followers and listen to their ideas. Reminiscing on leaders throughout history all over the world, it is clear that leaders that are collaborative with their followers are generally the most effective and successful. Allowing people to solve problems and perform certain tasks on their own merely with guidance is key to being an effective leader. George S. Patton-- one of the most highly regarded generals in World War II-- stated, “Don’t tell people how to do things, tell them what to do and let them surprise you with their results.” Patton did not constantly give his soldiers specific orders, but instead provided them with a plan and allowed them figure out how to approach the situation. This is a superb leadership tactic because it allows people to learn on their own and develop a greater understanding of the situation. Patton’s collaborative leadership strategy also benefited his relationship with his
Open Document