Comparing Leadership In The Sport And Chief Of Nation

The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate people to follow them. Managers have a position within the organisation, their teams work for them to complete tasks and in turn manage situations as they occur. Leaders on the other hand do not have teams when they are leading. Instead, formal control is given up, as to lead is have followers and this is always a voluntary activity. Telling people what to do does not inspire

The leaders take a focus that is more external, whereas, the focus of managers is more internal. Leaders have particular set competencies that are more forward thinking than managers. Leaders set a direction for organization. They motivate their employees, so that the business continues to exist and hopefully thrive in periods of change. Leaders keep the entity on course and to maneuver around obstacles that come in its way; for example, a captain commanding his ship at sea, whereas managers tend to the business at hand and make sure the staff is following proper procedures.

I found the Scott Williams video very interesting and informative. In this video he talks about the differences between leaders and managers. He mentioned the BECC model that stands for Believe, Encourage, Challenge and Correct and strongly believes that these are all qualities every leader should encourage in others. In this video Mr. Williams discusses numerous differences between leaders and managers. He states “Leaders have followers not subordinates because leaders develop other leaders, are about change, break the rules, use conflict as an asset, give credit to everyone involved and often change the world.” Whereas “Managers manage people and things, have subordinates that are told what to do, are about stability, make rules, avoid conflict,

Understanding the difference and similarities between managers and leaders can be enlightening. Managers develop and manage plans that impact the strategic vision of an organization while leaders set strategic visions for the organization. Managers establish plans, support strategic plans, and organizational objectives. Managers also evaluate and track the achievement of tactical plans that have been assigned to specific staff. While on the other hand leaders motivate staff to achieve the object and task set forth. Managers serve as problem solvers. Managers are the people who assign resources to groups. On the hand leaders serve as persuasive change agents.

When I think of the difference between managers and leaders I immediately think of sports. In particular, I think of quarterbacks in football. Quarterbacks the most important player on the field at all times. Quarterbacks should have at least one of the two traits. He should either be able to be a leader or be able to manage. The best can do both. When a quarterback is a great leader he can communicate to the team, the team believes in him and follows his decisions dauntlessly. While a quarterback that is a manager is able to control the game. The type of quarterback that manages the pace and direction of the game may not be the number one motivator, but does execute with precision. To be successful you have to be able to execute, leading

Managers are leaders, leaders are managers, these concepts have long been thought to be synonymous. Ideally, for a manager to be good, the former is the case, but this is not always the case. Further, one doesn’t have to be a manager to be a leader. Anyone can be a leader. They are the people who exhibit superior interpersonal qualities that allows them to create connections to obtain a desired outcome; these are informal leaders (Sullivan). Everyone knows that one or two informal leaders, the people you just get behind and follow because they are so charismatic and influential. They don’t stand up to be recognized, they simply do it, as it comes natural to them. Managers on the other hand are placed in a position of power by an organization

The terms manager and leader are often used interchangeably, but in reality they possess very different qualities. It can be said that leaders need to have some management skills, but managers do not need to possess leadership qualities. Some qualities they do have in common include the ability to work with groups of people and the need to meet certain

A leader most lead with the intent of motivating, influencing, coaching while encouraging others to see and to contribute to the vision and the goal of an organization. On the other hand, a manager is someone with the ability to control a group while setting entities to accomplish a goal (Nayar, 2013). While both are slightly different from one another, it is possible to possess all the qualities to be a great manager and a great leader at the same

According to Pamela Spahr from St. Thomas University Transformational Leaders “possess a single-minded need to streamline or change things that no longer work. The transformational leader motivates workers and understands how to form them into integral units that work well with others.” (Spahr, 2015)

Warren Bennis provided several distinctions between a manager and a leader: a leader innovates, develops new concepts, focuses on people rather than systems, inspires trust, has a long-range perspective, has his eye on the horizon, the leader asks what, and why (Satterlee, 2013, p. 102). A leader should motivate, drive, and inspire other members of the organization to believe in the vision

Within the module for Leadership and Followership, the concept that I found the most important was the Flow of Communication. While reading through this model, I visualized my squadron and the lack of communication that exists. In the first module entry I wrote, I expressed my need to better illustrate my leaders mission plans to my subordinates and peers, and vice versa. In this module entry, I want to touch more on ways to improve my squadrons lack of effective channels of communication.

Leadership and management are commonly mistaken to be the same. Leaders and managers in an organization both lead, but the two are not synonymous. Management functions can provide leadership; and leadership activities can contribute to managing. Often leadership is also misunderstood to mean directing and instructing people and making important decisions on behalf of any organization. Effective leadership is much more than these. Good leadership requires attitudes and behaviors (Chapman, A., 2010). It requires human qualities beyond conventional notions of authority whereas management relies heavily on tangibles measurable capabilities such as effective planning. The followings are some differences between leader and manager. Manager administers, and leader innovates. Manager maintains and leader develops. Manager focuses on systems and structures, and leader focuses on people. Manager imitates and leader originates. Manager accepts the status quo and leader challenges it. Manager has his or her eye always on the bottom line and leader has his or her eye on the horizon.

Leadership is a vital characteristic to be successful. Managers are often called to act as both a leader and a businessman. Finding a balance between managing and leading can be the difference between success and failure. Managers are asked to control their employees and promote the welfare of the business. Leaders, on the other hand, focus on fostering their mentees welfare and turning weaknesses into strengths.

The movie clip portrays the conventional way of how the general public views leaders and followers. As the book talks about that being called a team member or group member is better than being called a suborinate or follower, the ants in the line were clearerly followers. Not that followers cannot think for themself, because nearly everyone has someone else they follow, the ant could not think for himself in going around the leaf. I think that this is the problem with most followers, they do not want to think for themselfs and want someone like Mr. Soil, a leader, to guide them. I dont think this is wrong for people to want others to guide them because many people enjoy being a team member rather than being in charge. The book goes into detail

Management and leadership are viewed as two different perspectives in the business environment. As described by Dr. Warren Bennis ‘Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing’, this means that managers do things by the set rules and follow company policy, while leaders follow their own intuition, which may in turn be of more benefit to the company.