Leading A Team Into Change

The roles of the leadership in the clinics are essential to the success or unsuccessful implementation of change. The attitude of the leadership carries weight on how well the rest of the staff receives the change. Leaders on the clinic level have to accept changes whether good or bad and expect staff to challenge them. Leaders have to be strong and accept the change themselves and to support upper management. There are problems dealing with changes when issues arise between created civilian and military personnel. These issues are not easily dealt with and when changes are ensuing within a facility this causes undue stress within the organization. This is one reason that leadership needs to bring forth and implement changes within an organization as all one team because staff is well suited at picking up any rift

Implementing change among all organizations is necessary to achieve success; within the health care industry change is constant and it is the role of management teams to assess, plan, implement and evaluate change to ensure satisfaction. Considering this among the other aspects of running a successful organization it is essential to ensure that there is minimal resistance and familiarity to change. Demands of the consumers and staff as well as regulations are continuously changing. The responsibility of managers is to successfully lead these inevitable changes.

As a result, they can affect items that are working properly, as well as, incur associated cost without the benefits (Taylor, 2015). Next, the firm should glide toward step 1, which is the redesign or the adaptation of the individual’s roles, responsibilities, and relationships (Spector, 2013, p. 42). This step allows the employee’s to discover who they need to work with, how they will benefit the company strategy, and the outcomes they wish to achieve. In this particular scenario for illustration, the team of nurses, therapist, tech, and schedulers will needs to work together, discover what they needs to do to make an impact (minimizing wasting products or ensuing they charge them out to the patient), and move from only providing quality care to providing quality, cost effective care. The importance here is that the employees devised this new concept rather than top management forcing it down the chain. This area can also present some potential problems. The team or organization can be risk adverse and fear making mistakes or failing (Recklies, 2001). For example, if 2 options are available, the person will go with the one that has lower risk instead of the one that may be more risky and provide a higher return or better outcome. Moreover, employees may be resistant to change as they are uncomfortable with it, do not see the new skills as beneficial, or they prefer the status quo. The second step, help, requests

Understand the principles of change management in health and social care or children and young people’s settings. 01.1 01.2 01.3 01.4

In summary of Kris Cole’s work, “Change in Management” chapter 15, the writer first started the introduction with questions that are also an over view. A good manager should have the knowledge to answer these questions and adapt this information to whichever system they may face. This simple goal here is for the reader find answers to these questions throughout the chapter and to engage the reader in a sub assessment. The 2nd part of the introduction is a small scenario of a lower manager that has received information about a new system being implemented. She realizes the changes will be more exciting and better use of

A team is a type of organizational group with independent members. They share common goals and work together to meet these goals (Northouse, 2016). The organization where I work has teams at various levels for maximizing the success. These teams include, core teams, coordinating teams, patient aligned care team (PACT), contingency teams, ancillary teams, support and administration teams (Veterans Health Administration [VHA], 2015). Some of these teams have interdepartmental members while others have intradepartmental staff. Successful teams have a concrete blueprint and that contributes to their effective functioning. There are several factors that affect these teams irrespective of the level. The factors comprise the presence of a clear task, separation from non-team members, authority, and stability. The factors like working conditions, team process and bridging the gaps are concerns for the executive level. The complexity of the task, individual skills and their diverse specializations affect the selection of the team members. The team’s meaningful interactions decide their success. Independent teams can help promote friendly competition within the organization and lead to better staff performance. An efficient leader can design and launch an effective team through careful planning and selection of the right members. He/she keeps the factors that affect the success of the team in mind when designing the teams. The patient care units

We strive to be one of the leading providers of quality home health care services, recognized for enduring dedication to provide innovative, professional, and compassionate care to the communities we serve.

This book presents an array of practical procedures which can assist the prudent practitioner in preparing for change and how to handle all of the up’s and downs which accompany change. The two strengths in this book revolves around asking the right diagnostic questions which pave the way for change and the many characteristic of leaders who lead.

However Gopee and Galloway (2014) suggest that, the change can interact on the role manager or leader play. Change is important in NHS because it has be poor quality of care in the past. Victoria Climbie one the high

Change in healthcare is an inevitable certainty (Sullivan, 2013).Organizational change is mandatory to prevent stagnation. Change is often not a welcome process. In healthcare, how new policies and process are initiated and prepared for is crucial to its successful implementation. The purpose of this paper is to chronicle a proposed organizational change, using a selected theory of change.

This paper will explain the managers’ role within a company and their responsibility when implementing a change within a company. It’s not just the planning and organizing talking about what plans need to be placed in order to create a change in a company, but the manager must know what to expect and how to completely deal with staff to make a positive outcome for the team. In the end this paper will provide and explain the change process; assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation.

With the growing rate of the elderly, increasing the need for our services, the growth potential for our business is enormous. As long as we stand by our commitment of a professional company and live up to our own standards, we will surpass the

In addition, change is a factor within leadership in which a leader acknowledges the continuous change of the environment around them, and then adapts and develops alongside (Rodd, 2013). When change is taken into consideration by a leader and by the team they are able “develop new knowledge and ways of applying and integrating that knowledge with practice” (Rodd, 2013, p.183). Furthermore, to view change appropriately it must be flexible so it can be questioned and practiced within the team environment, where new knowledge and experiences can be learnt and shared, especially within New Zealand’s context where there are several continuous changes in early childhood services, by the way they are organised to the way they are controlled (Fasoli,

Lippitt’s Phases of Change is an extension of Lewin’s Three-Step Theory. The focus on Lippitt’s change theory is on the change agent rather than the change itself.

The merging of public expectations into a business model is not just about implementing change in an organization. It's about recognizing that change is for a reason of improving the wider social or community benefits and integrating bottom line profitability potentials. To make this happen, there has to be a blending of these values such that both elements of the new organization are realized an effort that is only now just beginning to happen (. Many organizations seem to want to achieve this goal even if it means moving their operations into the field of chaos where innovation gets to mix with opportunity.