Leading Indicators

It adequately reviews plausible studies from renowned authors and organizations, which improves its validity as a review document. The author adopts viewpoints that consider different variables, which express the thoroughness of this article. The author of this article is a significant contributor to safety literature through his books on safety management, which improves the validity of this article. The article insights from ASSE journals, Heinrich, Bird, the Stanford Report, OSHA and NIOSH research project. However, the author evaluates their respective ratios to determine discrepancies. The author further evaluates the items utilized in constituting direct and indirect costs, including the purpose of the evaluated articles. It reflects a thorough review against literature on safety, which improves the article’s

Records and statistics will be evaluated by inspection and investigation reports, workers orientations logs, equipment and logbooks, emergency response plans (drills, enforced safety, first aid), supervisory notes, and safety contacts (past and present) The reasoning to evaluate these areas is to ensure due diligence. This ensures the employer is taking responsibility for workers and strives to conserve a safe working environment.

Reporting of Injuries,Diseases and dangerous occurrences regulations of 1995 requires the reporting of work-related accidents, diseases and dangerous occurrences. The Act applies to all work related activities, but not to all work related incidents. The objective of the regulations is to enable the enforcing authorities to identify where and how risks arise and to investigate serious accidents so as to prevent them from occurring in the future and thus providing a safer work environment. The enforcing authorities can then help and advise you on preventive action to reduce injury, ill health and accidental loss,the main points of our own policy that relate to this are:

The human resources process has to accompany both the employee and employer in regard to safety issues. An employee wants the assurance of safe and healthy working conditions; anything less exposes danger to their own wellbeing. In addition employees must take heed to precautions design by the organization. However an employer wants to avoid expenditures in overhead by cutting cost or corners often putting their employees at harmful risk. In addition, organizations also have a lawful obligation in which they have to provide a safe workplace by preventing accidents, hazards, serious injuries or accident-related deaths. Negligence on either behalf can result in determination, fines, citations, work-related

If in the company there is a WHS program or a person in charge of, the information about hazards and the outcomes of risk assessment and control results might come from it.

Despite undeniable efforts investing in safety and health within the workplace, occupational accidents continue to account for injuries and deaths every year (Cadieux et al, 2006). In Quebec alone in the year of 2004, 176 deaths and 128,104 occupational injuries were registered by the National OHS board (Cadieux et al, 2006). In order to improve these rates worldwide, Occupational Health and Safety Management systems are developed and implemented in the workplace.

Accordingly, they found 48 employer safety obligations (e.g., provide personal protective equipment, reward safe working behaviour, and investigates hazards and risks), and 36 employee safety obligation items such as use work equipment properly, report safety incident, and follow safety rules.. However, even though they did not use psychometrically validated measurement, those obligation items can be used in the measuring physical psychological safety. Thus, physical risk psychological safety items will be derived from this measurement.

Hence, it would be important for a researcher to explore how work place safety practices of policies affect either employee productivity or the general organizational productivity. The following research question can be developed along this proposal to pursue further light on the issue

I have been asked to review three workplace injuries. The review will consist of analysis’s in the rate of recordable injuries (TRIR), the number of recordable injuries that an employee missed work, resulted in a death, reduction in work duty, and transfers (DART/LWDII), and the Severity Rate (SR) of incidents, on an average, of the number of lost days to injuries and illness in the workplace. These lagging indicators are measured after the event, and for comparison, leading indicators will be discussed to offer insight as to prevent the injuries in the future.

According to the Bureau of Labor, statistics indicate that more than 4.1 million people were hurt or injured on-the-job in 2006 and 5,488 were killed in 2007 (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2010, p. 511). Laws and regulatory requirements are currently in place to standardize and promote workplace safety. Organizations with extensive safety programs have reduced number of accidents, decreased workers’ compensation claims and lawsuits and lesser accident-related expenditures (Gomez-Mejia, et al, 2010, p. 511). This paper discusses the effects of legal, safety and regulatory requirements in

I would identify leading indicators through an ongoing base of formal and informal assessment types. It’s important to frequently use leading indicators because they provide early signals of progress towards measures of growth and achievement. Knowing the outcomes for of the leading indicators is important in determining if the interventions I am doing support student learning. Leading indicators provide me with the right information at the right time (through assessments). I can use this data to guide my teaching. Using leading indicators is important because they can give me an idea on students that are not performing, so that I can address risk of academic failure with changes to instruction.

assist in the identification of hazards, the assessment of risks and the implementation of risk control measures

An overview of the objectives to be achieved with respect to work health and safety – these should be measured of pro-activity in work health and safety activities rather than injury rates.

Validated compliance with regulations, site-specific safety plans, and industry best practices by leading work-site assessments and walk-throughs. Safety improvements spanned electrical cord, harness tie-off, protective equipment, and equipment operation credential fixes.

Safety within a workplace is matter that cannot be compromised, indeed has specific rules and regulations by the relevant agencies guiding the safeguarding of the employees safety within the work organization. There are various initiatives taken my organization to ensure that there is safety within the workplace. Regardless of the initiative taken employees should feel free to report any illnesses or injuries in the workplace if not then the entire workforce will be at risk. With a sound safety program in place there will be a reduction of accidents within the workplace. The paper will look at the pros and cons of using safety incentives and recognition programs as a means of enhancing safety in the workplace.